Election 2018 Open Thread v2 - Mia, Mimi, Gil, and T.J.
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 31, 2024, 03:47:34 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  Election 2018 Open Thread v2 - Mia, Mimi, Gil, and T.J.
« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 5 6 7 8 9 [10] 11 12 13 14 15 ... 41
Author Topic: Election 2018 Open Thread v2 - Mia, Mimi, Gil, and T.J.  (Read 77718 times)
morgieb
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,643
Australia


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -8.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #225 on: November 17, 2018, 03:12:00 AM »



#Dominating

I remember when the pundits assured me this was a pure toss up race. Clearly Rohrabacher's 30% of the vote in the jungle primary was a major sign of strength.
Still waiting for the votes from Moscow to come in.
Logged
smoltchanov
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,393
Russian Federation


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #226 on: November 17, 2018, 06:00:37 AM »



#Dominating

I remember when the pundits assured me this was a pure toss up race. Clearly Rohrabacher's 30% of the vote in the jungle primary was a major sign of strength.
Still waiting for the votes from Moscow to come in.

As Moscow citizen can assure you, that we have much more important business on our hands..
Logged
GeorgiaModerate
Moderator
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 33,111


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #227 on: November 17, 2018, 09:08:48 AM »

Logged
Virginiá
Virginia
Administratrix
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,914
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -6.97, S: -5.91

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #228 on: November 17, 2018, 09:56:00 AM »

Logged
100% pro-life no matter what
ExtremeRepublican
Moderators
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,782


Political Matrix
E: 7.35, S: 5.57


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #229 on: November 17, 2018, 10:55:49 AM »



It doesn't sound like they weight for one of a couple things-

That CA (the largest state) was D vs. D
That the states not holding senate elections this year were disproportionately red states
Logged
Thatkat04
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 462
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #230 on: November 17, 2018, 11:51:59 AM »

I think Nate Silver and Harry Enten read Sean T.'s article about how 2018 wasn't a wave election.
Logged
Pouring Rain and Blairing Music
Fubart Solman
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,810
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #231 on: November 17, 2018, 12:54:10 PM »


Kinda feel bad for laughing, but damn that’s hilarious.
Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,349
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #232 on: November 17, 2018, 01:37:59 PM »



#Dominating

I remember when the pundits assured me this was a pure toss up race. Clearly Rohrabacher's 30% of the vote in the jungle primary was a major sign of strength.

There seems to be a race between Rouda and Hill for who is the second-biggest pickup after Levin. I hope Katie wins, but either way those are really strong numbers.
Logged
Former Dean Phillips Supporters for Haley (I guess???!?) 👁️
The Impartial Spectator
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,895


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #233 on: November 17, 2018, 01:42:18 PM »

A small # of additional votes from Kings County in CA-21:



This one is closer to the Hillary numbers, with Valadao over-performing them only very slightly.

We have not gotten any updates from Kern in a long time (the most Dem part of CA-21), so when they do report we might get a big dump. If the next Kern dump is big, Cox needs it to be good, and for it to either put him outright in the lead or at least close to it.
Logged
Former Dean Phillips Supporters for Haley (I guess???!?) 👁️
The Impartial Spectator
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,895


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #234 on: November 17, 2018, 01:59:49 PM »
« Edited: November 17, 2018, 02:05:23 PM by Queen Pelosi, Regina of the House, Regnant of Amerittania 👁 »

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.
incorrect



R+12

But even if you do that, the other district that does contain SLC will presumably go north into Davis County and will end up about R+5 or so. That will be the case unless SLC is split into even more pieces, which any nonpartisan map wouldn't really do...
Logged
Bidenworth2020
politicalmasta73
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,407
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #235 on: November 17, 2018, 02:02:12 PM »

Nope. You can't draw a Safe R seat entirely within Salt Lake City or Salt Lake County.

Salt Lake City is really Democratic, and the GOP areas within the county are just too small to create a whole CD out of.
incorrect



R+12

But even if you do that, the other district that does contain SLC will presumably go north into Davis County and will end up about R+5 or so. That will be the case unless SLC is split into even more pieces, which any nonpartisan map wouldn't really do...
[/quote]
nope. then you put actually SLC in with UBER republican rurals and end up with a R+19 district or so.
Logged
Former Dean Phillips Supporters for Haley (I guess???!?) 👁️
The Impartial Spectator
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,895


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #236 on: November 17, 2018, 02:15:31 PM »

nope. then you put actually SLC in with UBER republican rurals and end up with a R+19 district or so.

You would it if were an R gerrymander, but I don't see how a commission would do that. To get to the R rural areas you would have to either cross Salt Lake or cross mountains to the east to get to the rurals. That is not a very natural way for the district to go. If you do have that district you drew in south SL County, then it is much more natural to combine SL City with Davis County, which is not rural and is just to the north (and is also less R than the rurals). And with population growth, it would probably end up going substantially less far north than here, which makes it less R.

I would say that something like this with the blue district R+6 is the worst case realistic scenario for Dems from a non-partisan commission, and if someone like McAdams could win the red district it could even be a dummymander from the R perspective:

Logged
2016
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,744


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #237 on: November 17, 2018, 02:21:50 PM »

I disagree a whole lot what Nate Silver wrote on his Twitter about the Senate.

From a historial Perspective what Republicans have done in the Senate since Obama took Office in 2009 is nothing short of SPECTACULAR

2010: They knocked off two Incumbents in Blanche Lincoln and Russ Feingold
2014: They beat Incumbents in Arkansas (Pryor), Louisiana (Landrieu), Alaska (Begich), Colorado (M. Udall), North Carolina (Hagan)
2018: They defeated Incumbents in Indiana (Donnelly), North Dakota (Heitkamp), Missouri (McCaskill) and Florida (Nelson)

Defeating Incumbents is very hard thing to do.
Logged
Badger
badger
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 40,462
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #238 on: November 17, 2018, 02:22:40 PM »

Orange dropped. Cisneros lead at over 3K votes-

We should be getting a call from AP tonight since they called the 45th for Porter when she had a 3K vote lead.



Huh, this is it. Nixon's hometown, and presidential library are about to be represented by a Democrat.

I'm salivating at that thought.
Logged
Badger
badger
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 40,462
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #239 on: November 17, 2018, 02:26:13 PM »

Orange dropped. Cisneros lead at over 3K votes-

We should be getting a call from AP tonight since they called the 45th for Porter when she had a 3K vote lead.



Huh, this is it. Nixon's hometown, and presidential library are about to be represented by a Democrat.

Reagan’s library will also be represented by a Democrat


Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy
Logged
Person Man
Angry_Weasel
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,667
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #240 on: November 17, 2018, 02:42:53 PM »

Orange dropped. Cisneros lead at over 3K votes-

We should be getting a call from AP tonight since they called the 45th for Porter when she had a 3K vote lead.



Huh, this is it. Nixon's hometown, and presidential library are about to be represented by a Democrat.

Reagan’s library will also be represented by a Democrat


Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy

Someone is rolling in their grave...
Logged
Bidenworth2020
politicalmasta73
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,407
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #241 on: November 17, 2018, 03:26:28 PM »

nope. then you put actually SLC in with UBER republican rurals and end up with a R+19 district or so.

You would it if were an R gerrymander, but I don't see how a commission would do that. To get to the R rural areas you would have to either cross Salt Lake or cross mountains to the east to get to the rurals. That is not a very natural way for the district to go. If you do have that district you drew in south SL County, then it is much more natural to combine SL City with Davis County, which is not rural and is just to the north (and is also less R than the rurals). And with population growth, it would probably end up going substantially less far north than here, which makes it less R.

I would say that something like this with the blue district R+6 is the worst case realistic scenario for Dems from a non-partisan commission, and if someone like McAdams could win the red district it could even be a dummymander from the R perspective:


I was under the impression that this was a very loose redistricting bill, and just set up loose rules
Logged
Former Dean Phillips Supporters for Haley (I guess???!?) 👁️
The Impartial Spectator
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,895


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #242 on: November 17, 2018, 03:48:59 PM »

nope. then you put actually SLC in with UBER republican rurals and end up with a R+19 district or so.

You would it if were an R gerrymander, but I don't see how a commission would do that. To get to the R rural areas you would have to either cross Salt Lake or cross mountains to the east to get to the rurals. That is not a very natural way for the district to go. If you do have that district you drew in south SL County, then it is much more natural to combine SL City with Davis County, which is not rural and is just to the north (and is also less R than the rurals). And with population growth, it would probably end up going substantially less far north than here, which makes it less R.

I would say that something like this with the blue district R+6 is the worst case realistic scenario for Dems from a non-partisan commission, and if someone like McAdams could win the red district it could even be a dummymander from the R perspective:


I was under the impression that this was a very loose redistricting bill, and just set up loose rules

https://ballotpedia.org/Utah_Proposition_4,_Independent_Redistricting_Commission_Initiative_(2018)

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

I would think this should mean that Salt Lake City is not split and there should be 1 district within Salt Lake County. It should make it hard to have a SLC + rural district because that would not be particularly compact, would not allow for ease of transport (you either have to cross mountains or the Great Salt Lake), and it wouldn't follow natural and geographic boundaries/barriers. The only way to really follow natural boundaries from Salt Lake City is either to north into Davis County or South into the rest of Salt Lake County.
Logged
GeorgiaModerate
Moderator
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 33,111


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #243 on: November 17, 2018, 04:16:16 PM »

Logged
aaroncd107
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 307


Political Matrix
E: -4.90, S: -8.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #244 on: November 17, 2018, 05:26:24 PM »

A question I’ve been thinking of: would TJ Cox have won if he were Hispanic? I think the answer is almost certainly yes if you look at the legislative results. Hispanic Democratic state Senate challenger Melissa Hurtado is on track to beat Anglo incumbent R Senator Andy Vidak in the overlapping district by 10%. She wasn’t that well funded comparatively or anything special like that to explain the divergence.
TJ’s not out yet, and I think he might eek it. It couldn’t have hurt him, though.
Logged
Dr Oz Lost Party!
PittsburghSteel
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,047
United States


P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #245 on: November 17, 2018, 05:29:35 PM »
« Edited: November 17, 2018, 05:32:45 PM by Lou Barletta's Teeth »

Are we getting any LA dumps today?

And when will the NY-22 recount end?
Logged
Progressive Pessimist
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 33,943
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.71, S: -7.65

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #246 on: November 17, 2018, 05:45:29 PM »



Good riddance to them!
Logged
Brittain33
brittain33
Moderator
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,047


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #247 on: November 17, 2018, 06:05:17 PM »

This pic is getting heavily fact-checked on Twitter.... may be too good to be true.



Good riddance to them!
Logged
Bidenworth2020
politicalmasta73
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,407
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #248 on: November 17, 2018, 06:22:59 PM »

nope. then you put actually SLC in with UBER republican rurals and end up with a R+19 district or so.

You would it if were an R gerrymander, but I don't see how a commission would do that. To get to the R rural areas you would have to either cross Salt Lake or cross mountains to the east to get to the rurals. That is not a very natural way for the district to go. If you do have that district you drew in south SL County, then it is much more natural to combine SL City with Davis County, which is not rural and is just to the north (and is also less R than the rurals). And with population growth, it would probably end up going substantially less far north than here, which makes it less R.

I would say that something like this with the blue district R+6 is the worst case realistic scenario for Dems from a non-partisan commission, and if someone like McAdams could win the red district it could even be a dummymander from the R perspective:


I was under the impression that this was a very loose redistricting bill, and just set up loose rules

https://ballotpedia.org/Utah_Proposition_4,_Independent_Redistricting_Commission_Initiative_(2018)

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

I would think this should mean that Salt Lake City is not split and there should be 1 district within Salt Lake County. It should make it hard to have a SLC + rural district because that would not be particularly compact, would not allow for ease of transport (you either have to cross mountains or the Great Salt Lake), and it wouldn't follow natural and geographic boundaries/barriers. The only way to really follow natural boundaries from Salt Lake City is either to north into Davis County or South into the rest of Salt Lake County.
are you sure they can't just pull a Florida... I am sure courts would side them?
Logged
Dr Oz Lost Party!
PittsburghSteel
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,047
United States


P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #249 on: November 17, 2018, 06:36:15 PM »

Are we getting any LA dumps today?

And when will the NY-22 recount end?
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 5 6 7 8 9 [10] 11 12 13 14 15 ... 41  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.08 seconds with 11 queries.