Should Saddam be tried at the Hague instead? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 29, 2024, 12:36:00 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  International General Discussion (Moderators: afleitch, Hash)
  Should Saddam be tried at the Hague instead? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Should Saddam be tried at the Hague instead?
#1
yes
 
#2
no
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 31

Author Topic: Should Saddam be tried at the Hague instead?  (Read 3855 times)
Emsworth
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,054


« on: October 26, 2005, 08:38:42 PM »

No, he should not. Iraq has not accepted the jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court--and rightfully so. I do not see why it should give up its sovereignty to some international body.
Logged
Emsworth
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,054


« Reply #1 on: October 29, 2005, 12:41:28 PM »

Oh and that sort of weirdness wasn't quite as rare as you might think... the idea of corpses being somehow untouchable is a pretty modern idea.
I believe that, in sixteenth century Scotland, the idea of posthumous punishment was carried to an even greater extreme. In one case, a dead man was summoned to face charges of high treason; his bones were exhumed, presented at the bar of the court, and endured a posthumous trial and execution.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.026 seconds with 13 queries.