Should Saddam be tried at the Hague instead? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 28, 2024, 06:04:53 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  International General Discussion (Moderators: afleitch, Hash)
  Should Saddam be tried at the Hague instead? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Should Saddam be tried at the Hague instead?
#1
yes
 
#2
no
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 31

Author Topic: Should Saddam be tried at the Hague instead?  (Read 3831 times)
opebo
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 47,009


« on: October 24, 2005, 11:39:20 AM »

Saddam should be freed with an apology and reinstated with reparations.  Failing that, the Hague is less of a joke than this American stooge 'court'.
Logged
opebo
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 47,009


« Reply #1 on: October 27, 2005, 04:11:23 PM »

No, he should not. Iraq has not accepted the jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court--and rightfully so. I do not see why it should give up its sovereignty to some international body.

It can't 'give up' its sovereignty - that was stolen by force by the USA not so long ago.
Logged
opebo
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 47,009


« Reply #2 on: October 29, 2005, 12:51:38 PM »


His defense, obviously, PrudeBrunsel, is that he is being illegitimately 'tried' by a kangaroo court.  He may have slaughtered tens of thousands, but such is the ordinary business of government, and it is absurd to charge him with a 'crime' as a head of state.

Of course he will be lynched by the stooges of the christians regardless, so what does it matter?
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.019 seconds with 14 queries.