MO-SEN: Hawley +7 in internal, McCaskill DOOOOOOOOOOOOOMMED (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 29, 2024, 10:48:36 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2018 Senatorial Election Polls
  MO-SEN: Hawley +7 in internal, McCaskill DOOOOOOOOOOOOOMMED (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: MO-SEN: Hawley +7 in internal, McCaskill DOOOOOOOOOOOOOMMED  (Read 2325 times)
Former Dean Phillips Supporters for Haley (I guess???!?) 👁️
The Impartial Spectator
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,846


« on: October 24, 2018, 11:03:57 AM »

Hawley 49
McCaskill 42

OnMessage (R) internal

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/campaigns/claire-mccaskill-on-the-ropes-per-fresh-poll-from-josh-hawley

538 House effect adjusts it to Hawley +1.2
Logged
Former Dean Phillips Supporters for Haley (I guess???!?) 👁️
The Impartial Spectator
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,846


« Reply #1 on: October 24, 2018, 11:10:22 AM »

Exaggerated, but it should be obvious to everyone that McCaskill is in big trouble.

Yeah, she would be Blanched in a Clinton midterm.
Logged
Former Dean Phillips Supporters for Haley (I guess???!?) 👁️
The Impartial Spectator
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,846


« Reply #2 on: October 24, 2018, 04:58:20 PM »

omg.. calm down everyone.

Even I do not believe this poll. I believe Hawley will win by a hair but there is no doubt McCaskill is in a very dicey situation. She is not popular and Democrats may have been better off if she retired.

You think? Like if Kander had run instead? If McCaskill had stepped down and he had run again and been in good mental health, do you think he would win this time?
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.023 seconds with 14 queries.