Alternate “West Virginia” more closely based on April secession vote
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 01, 2024, 04:17:42 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Election What-ifs? (Moderator: Dereich)
  Alternate “West Virginia” more closely based on April secession vote
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Alternate “West Virginia” more closely based on April secession vote  (Read 487 times)
mianfei
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 321
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: October 23, 2018, 10:25:28 PM »

Ever since discovering that large parts of what would become southern West Virginia actually were in favor of secession even at the original April convention (notably such counties as Logan, Boone and Wyoming), I have imagined what if the split in Virginia was more consistent with original votes on secession??



The map above gives an idea of how “West Virginia” might have been formed boundaries had been more closely reflective of the original April vote re secession. I have, as noted earlier, removed many secessionist southern counties and transferred them back to Virginia, but have added a number of counties in what is today Northern Virginia as these counties, near the national capital, were not in favour of secession at the original April convention (though they did reverse in May) and were considered for inclusion in the new state. I considered adding Augusta and Highland Counties – which also voted against secession – but felt this would make the map a bit difficult and was unsure about how supportive they were for secession since they were never considered for the seceding state.

Pink-coloured Eastern Shore counties voted against secession in April and were considered for inclusion in the new state, but would be very difficult to imagine as part of any “West Virginia” given they were close to parts of Maryland that ultimately supported that state’s unsuccessful move to secede.

The basic question is how would this alternate “West Virginia” (and alternate Virginia) have developed politically in the century and a half since the Civil War? It would no doubt have been more Republican than the actual GOP up to the Bill Clinton Presidency since:

  • Democratic secessionist counties remain in Virginia
  • most of the major coal counties that became union centers with the New Deal remain part of Virginia
  • suburban counties in the alternate “West Virginia” leaned Republican between Eisenhower and Bill Clinton

Other possible differences:
  • the concentration of coal counties in VA rather than “WV” might have permitted a landowner/mining alliance similar to Alabama to develop more deeply in VA, which would have made for a more turbulent Civil Rights period in the alternate VA
  • NOVA – which becomes eastern “West Virginia” is this alternate secession proposal – might have felt much more isolated from its state government and pressed harder for a DC statehood of which it would have been a part

Any further thoughts on this alternative Virginia split?
Logged
America Needs a 13-6 Progressive SCOTUS
Solid4096
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,757


Political Matrix
E: -8.88, S: -8.51

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: October 23, 2018, 11:03:47 PM »

Well Clinton would have won this West Virginia, while Trump would have won this Virginia.
Logged
Florida Man for Crime
The Impartial Spectator
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,906


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: October 23, 2018, 11:25:57 PM »

Well Clinton would have won this West Virginia, while Trump would have won this Virginia.

This would be bad for Dems now, because this West Virginia would have fewer electoral votes than the real Virginia does.
Logged
Continential
The Op
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,594
Political Matrix
E: 1.10, S: -5.30

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: October 24, 2018, 06:58:52 AM »

Well Clinton would have won this West Virginia, while Trump would have won this Virginia.

This would be bad for Dems now, because this West Virginia would have fewer electoral votes than the real Virginia does.
But remember Money can go to other states
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.028 seconds with 10 queries.