Which combination of results is most likely in ND & TN?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 27, 2024, 01:14:45 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  Which combination of results is most likely in ND & TN?
« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2
Poll
Question: Which of these combinations of results is most likely?
#1
ND-D + TN-D
 
#2
ND-D + TN-R
 
#3
ND-R + TN-D
 
#4
ND-R + TN-R
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 76

Author Topic: Which combination of results is most likely in ND & TN?  (Read 1045 times)
TML
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,445


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: October 01, 2018, 11:02:02 PM »

At this time, polls suggest ND-R + TN-D, but 538's fundamentals suggest ND-D + TN-R.

538 also mentions that these races are correlated to a meaningful degree, which suggests that it wouldn't take much to shift them both in the same general direction (one way or the other).

What do you guys think?
Logged
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,840
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: October 01, 2018, 11:03:44 PM »

Republicans win both.
Logged
Xing
xingkerui
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,307
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.52, S: -3.91

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: October 01, 2018, 11:05:53 PM »

Logged
MT Treasurer
IndyRep
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,283
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: October 01, 2018, 11:06:46 PM »

Logged
wesmoorenerd
westroopnerd
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,600
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.16, S: -7.13

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: October 02, 2018, 12:14:31 AM »

I'm a believer in the possibility of ND-R TN-D, but Republicans win both is probably the most likely.
Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,172
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: October 02, 2018, 12:21:30 AM »

Logged
😥
andjey
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,510
Ukraine
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: October 02, 2018, 12:38:28 AM »

I'm a believer in the possibility of ND-R TN-D, but Republicans win both is probably the most likely.
Logged
MT Treasurer
IndyRep
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,283
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: October 02, 2018, 10:11:54 AM »


I would add that I still believe both races are Toss-ups, though.
Logged
ElectionsGuy
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,106
United States


Political Matrix
E: 7.10, S: -7.65

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: October 02, 2018, 10:37:27 AM »

Logged
Del Tachi
Republican95
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,864
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.52, S: 1.46

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: October 02, 2018, 10:38:24 AM »

Logged
Skye
yeah_93
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,581
Venezuela


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: October 02, 2018, 10:39:24 AM »

Logged
Xeuma
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 713
Vatican City State


Political Matrix
E: -4.26, S: 0.00

P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: October 02, 2018, 11:45:49 AM »

I'm a believer in the possibility of ND-R TN-D, but Republicans win both is probably the most likely.
Logged
UncleSam
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,514


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: October 02, 2018, 11:58:30 AM »

Rs win both is the ‘most likely’ but any of the four are possible (<10% chance). Rs win both is maybe 40% ish chance? I think ND goes D before TN in most circumstances, though it could be the other way around.
Logged
RussFeingoldWasRobbed
Progress96
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,249
United States


Political Matrix
E: -8.65, S: -6.26

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: October 02, 2018, 12:35:54 PM »

Cramer/Bredesen
Logged
Brittain33
brittain33
Moderator
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,969


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: October 02, 2018, 01:25:41 PM »

Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,172
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: October 02, 2018, 02:01:00 PM »


Yeah, exactly.

I love how people seem to write off Bredesen because muh fundamentals while writing off Heitkamp because muh polls while forgetting that if you look at the other indicator for each race, you get the exact opposite outcome.
Logged
Holy Unifying Centrist
DTC
Atlas Politician
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,209


Political Matrix
E: 9.53, S: 10.54

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: October 02, 2018, 02:54:35 PM »

The fundamentals are pretty bad for Heidi too. She's running in a state Trump won by 36 vs a fairly popular rep who is practically an incumbent
Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,172
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: October 02, 2018, 03:16:19 PM »

The fundamentals are pretty bad for Heidi too. She's running in a state Trump won by 36 vs a fairly popular rep who is practically an incumbent

The fundamentals say she's up 6.
Logged
Holy Unifying Centrist
DTC
Atlas Politician
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,209


Political Matrix
E: 9.53, S: 10.54

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: October 02, 2018, 03:49:48 PM »

The fundamentals are pretty bad for Heidi too. She's running in a state Trump won by 36 vs a fairly popular rep who is practically an incumbent

The fundamentals say she's up 6.

A fundamentals model that skews the results 42 points from 2016 is not exactly a good model. 538 predicted that Hillary would win NC (she lost by over 3%).
Logged
TML
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,445


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #19 on: October 02, 2018, 04:41:34 PM »

The fundamentals are pretty bad for Heidi too. She's running in a state Trump won by 36 vs a fairly popular rep who is practically an incumbent

The fundamentals say she's up 6.

A fundamentals model that skews the results 42 points from 2016 is not exactly a good model. 538 predicted that Hillary would win NC (she lost by over 3%).

According to 538, fundamentals are better at predicting results when there are few good-quality polls. They point out that ND has relatively few good-quality polls, so that is why they think there is a good chance the polls will move in the direction of the fundamentals between now and Election Day.

If you think the magnitude of the result skew from 2016 is big, try West Virginia, where Manchin is heavily favored to win according to 538 despite Democrats losing at the Presidential level by nearly 50 points in 2016.
Logged
Orser67
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,947
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #20 on: October 02, 2018, 08:40:40 PM »

Rs win both: 35%
Rs win TN, lose ND: 20%
Rs lose TN, win ND: 10%
Rs lose both: 35%

I actually feel pretty good about those numbers.
Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,172
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #21 on: October 02, 2018, 09:28:31 PM »

The fundamentals are pretty bad for Heidi too. She's running in a state Trump won by 36 vs a fairly popular rep who is practically an incumbent

The fundamentals say she's up 6.

A fundamentals model that skews the results 42 points from 2016 is not exactly a good model. 538 predicted that Hillary would win NC (she lost by over 3%).

"I don't like what the data says because the data has been wrong once, which means it's always wrong, so I'm just going to make up my own numbers based on gut feelings."
Logged
Holy Unifying Centrist
DTC
Atlas Politician
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,209


Political Matrix
E: 9.53, S: 10.54

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #22 on: October 02, 2018, 09:40:13 PM »

The fundamentals are pretty bad for Heidi too. She's running in a state Trump won by 36 vs a fairly popular rep who is practically an incumbent

The fundamentals say she's up 6.

A fundamentals model that skews the results 42 points from 2016 is not exactly a good model. 538 predicted that Hillary would win NC (she lost by over 3%).

"I don't like what the data says because the data has been wrong once, which means it's always wrong, so I'm just going to make up my own numbers based on gut feelings."

The data we have is that Trump won ND by 36 (a massive 16 point shift from 2012) & Heitkamp is down by 4 or more in every poll, including internals by the DCCC. Kevin Cramer has high favorables in all of these polls + the state shifted 16 points from 2012 which explains why Heitkamp could (barely) win in 2012 yet still lose in 2018.

By this logic, Manchin should be losing too, but Morrissey frequently has double digit unfavorable ratings, which explains why he is struggling hard.

My gut feelings are that Heitkamp is one of my favorite senators, so if I was going by my gut feelings, I would say Heitkamp is the best and will win. Gut feelings are worthless, though.
Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,172
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #23 on: October 02, 2018, 09:46:02 PM »

Which is why I'm trusting the guy who crunches the numbers over the guy who throws a bunch of impressionistic facts together and pretend they prove anything.

Heitkamp is a slight underdog right now. Nothing more, nothing less.
Logged
MT Treasurer
IndyRep
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,283
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #24 on: October 02, 2018, 10:12:49 PM »
« Edited: October 02, 2018, 10:17:14 PM by MT Treasurer »

Pretty sure that the 538 model overestimates incumbents in general (see also: Heller, Dean).
Logged
Pages: [1] 2  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.063 seconds with 13 queries.