2018 Congressional Generic Ballot and House Polls Megathread - Part 3
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 08, 2024, 05:10:46 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  2018 Congressional Generic Ballot and House Polls Megathread - Part 3
« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 11 12 13 14 15 [16] 17 18 19 20 21 ... 75
Author Topic: 2018 Congressional Generic Ballot and House Polls Megathread - Part 3  (Read 131017 times)
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,840
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #375 on: September 26, 2018, 06:49:52 AM »

USC/LA Times, Aug 22-Sep 24, 4161 registered voters including 2151 likely voters

Story at http://www.latimes.com/politics/la-na-pol-usc-latimes-poll-20180926-story.html#, toplines will be posted later this morning.

Among likely voters: D 55, R 41

Many details in the story, including:

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

26 points?! These suburban women are gonna give the rural racist white male hicks a burbstompin with their high heels they won't soon forget.
Logged
Chancellor Tanterterg
Mr. X
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,685
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #376 on: September 26, 2018, 07:21:43 AM »

We have inexplicably failed to run even a B-list candidate against Valadao thus far.

It is because no Democrats participate in the political process enough to actually vote in CA-21, much less run for office.

Actually, we have a top-shelf A-list potential candidate in Rudy Salas (who I suspect is [wisely] waiting until 2020 to run) and several other decent potential candidates (though none as strong as Salas would be) such as Henry Perea.  There are a variety of reasons why none of these folks have run, but I think Valadao is probably gonna lose once he faces a solid opponent in even a neutral year. 
Logged
TheRocketRaccoon
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 761
Singapore


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #377 on: September 26, 2018, 08:13:55 AM »

Logged
ON Progressive
OntarioProgressive
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,106
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -8.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #378 on: September 26, 2018, 08:38:17 AM »



Hopefully, Flawless Beautiful Campa-Najjar is ahead. I won’t count on it though. I’m thinking Hunter by 5.
Logged
Dr Oz Lost Party!
PittsburghSteel
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,055
United States


P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #379 on: September 26, 2018, 09:21:47 AM »

USC/LA Times, Aug 22-Sep 24, 4161 registered voters including 2151 likely voters

Story at http://www.latimes.com/politics/la-na-pol-usc-latimes-poll-20180926-story.html#, toplines will be posted later this morning.

Among likely voters: D 55, R 41

Many details in the story, including:

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Blacks support Dems 94-4%. But Candace and Kanye told me that there was a major black exodus from the DEMONcrats...
Logged
Florida Man for Crime
The Impartial Spectator
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,922


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #380 on: September 26, 2018, 09:59:34 AM »

Actually, we have a top-shelf A-list potential candidate in Rudy Salas (who I suspect is [wisely] waiting until 2020 to run) and several other decent potential candidates (though none as strong as Salas would be) such as Henry Perea.  There are a variety of reasons why none of these folks have run, but I think Valadao is probably gonna lose once he faces a solid opponent in even a neutral year. 

I'd say it takes a neutral Presidential year in particular, not just a neutral year, for the reason of higher Latino turnout in Presidential years. Yes, 2020 is the best shot at Valadao.
Logged
2016
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,758


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #381 on: September 26, 2018, 10:34:46 AM »

I think they might have already been posted but here they are...

Survey USA Polls from CA

CA-21
David Valadao (R) 50
T. J. Cox (D) 39
http://www.surveyusa.com/client/PollReport.aspx?g=8c4f7fef-0470-425f-a21f-e828438aac5e
Trump has a positive JA in that District 48-43

CA-16
Jim Costa (D) 51
Elizabeth Heng (R) 40
http://www.surveyusa.com/client/PollReport.aspx?g=ae720a52-3b57-45b8-a4be-a487a9040d5b
Trumps JA is 39-55 in that District.

And one SUSA Poll from MN-2

Craig (D) 48
Lewis (R) 45
https://kstp.com/kstpImages/repository/cs/files/PollPrint.pdf
Logged
GeorgiaModerate
Moderator
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 33,165


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #382 on: September 26, 2018, 11:58:28 AM »

YouGov, Sep. 23-25, 1238 registered voters

D: 46 (+1)
R: 38 (-3)

Logged
GeorgiaModerate
Moderator
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 33,165


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #383 on: September 26, 2018, 12:55:30 PM »

Hill.TV American Barometer Survey, Sep. 21-22, 1000 RV

D: 44 (+3)
R: 36 (nc)
Logged
GeorgiaModerate
Moderator
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 33,165


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #384 on: September 26, 2018, 01:28:20 PM »

Morning Consult/Politico, Sep. 20-23, 1966 registered voters

D:43 (nc)
R: 35 (-3)

That's three polls today at D+8...unusual agreement.
Logged
ON Progressive
OntarioProgressive
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,106
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -8.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #385 on: September 26, 2018, 02:33:26 PM »

DE-AL (University of Delaware):

Lisa Blunt Rochester (D-inc) 58
Scott Walker (R, not related to that Scott Walker) 28

https://www.cpc.udel.edu/content-sub-site/Documents/CPC%20poll%209-25-18%20FINAL%20RELEASE.pdf
Logged
Co-Chair Bagel23
Bagel23
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,369
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.48, S: -1.83

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #386 on: September 26, 2018, 02:34:11 PM »

DE-AL (University of Delaware)Sad

Lisa Blunt Rochester (D-inc) 58
Scott Walker (R, not related to that Scott Walker) 28

https://www.cpc.udel.edu/content-sub-site/Documents/CPC%20poll%209-25-18%20FINAL%20RELEASE.pdf

I just almost yelled who tf polled Delaware out loud now.
Logged
Gass3268
Moderator
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,574
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #387 on: September 26, 2018, 03:40:40 PM »



Logged
Devils30
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,085
United States


Political Matrix
E: -2.06, S: -4.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #388 on: September 26, 2018, 03:44:08 PM »

If the white vote is actually GOP by 3-5% like these polls have, it will be an absolute tsunami
Logged
Dr Oz Lost Party!
PittsburghSteel
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,055
United States


P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #389 on: September 26, 2018, 03:44:41 PM »

Whew. That white college grad margin...
Logged
GeorgiaModerate
Moderator
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 33,165


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #390 on: September 26, 2018, 03:46:07 PM »





Their previous poll (July 30-Aug 12) was D+7, 46/39.

Something in most of the recent polls: the number of undecided voters is shrinking significantly.  More people are making up their minds, and predominantly toward the Democrats.
Logged
Gass3268
Moderator
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,574
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #391 on: September 26, 2018, 03:48:14 PM »


Their previous poll (July 30-Aug 12) was D+7, 46/39.

Something in most of the recent polls: the number of undecided voters is shrinking significantly.  More people are making up their minds, and predominantly toward the Democrats.

Reminds me of almost all of the special elections (exepct GA-06).
Logged
Zaybay
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,066
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.25, S: -6.50

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #392 on: September 26, 2018, 04:04:08 PM »


Their previous poll (July 30-Aug 12) was D+7, 46/39.

Something in most of the recent polls: the number of undecided voters is shrinking significantly.  More people are making up their minds, and predominantly toward the Democrats.

Reminds me of almost all of the special elections (exepct GA-06).


That was expected, this is what happens every wave year, meaning the current GCB is likely to get higher for the Dems, not lower, barring any October surprises.
Logged
Nyvin
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,705
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #393 on: September 26, 2018, 04:06:46 PM »

Monmouth poll for CA-50 coming out tomorrow.  That'll be interesting if the dates are after the indictment.
Logged
Virginiá
Virginia
Administratrix
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,920
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -6.97, S: -5.91

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #394 on: September 26, 2018, 04:10:39 PM »

How is it possible for Pew's poll to have Democrats up 58 - 39 with white college grads, but then only 57 - 38 with college graduates of all races? Non-white college grads are significantly more Democratic than white college grads, even if they are slightly less Democratic than non-white non-college voters.

Shouldn't the total college grads (white/non-white) be > white college grad %?
Logged
Florida Man for Crime
The Impartial Spectator
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,922


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #395 on: September 26, 2018, 04:26:54 PM »

How is it possible for Pew's poll to have Democrats up 58 - 39 with white college grads, but then only 57 - 38 with college graduates of all races? Non-white college grads are significantly more Democratic than white college grads, even if they are slightly less Democratic than non-white non-college voters.

Shouldn't the total college grads (white/non-white) be > white college grad %?

White college grads also includes postgrads, whereas the regular college grad excludes postgrads (that is another category in that crosstab).
Logged
GeorgiaModerate
Moderator
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 33,165


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #396 on: September 26, 2018, 04:29:00 PM »

For those that think because the Republicans won the 2010 and 2014 midterms, the same will necessarily be true in 2018:

Logged
ON Progressive
OntarioProgressive
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,106
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -8.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #397 on: September 26, 2018, 04:31:00 PM »

How is it possible for Pew's poll to have Democrats up 58 - 39 with white college grads, but then only 57 - 38 with college graduates of all races? Non-white college grads are significantly more Democratic than white college grads, even if they are slightly less Democratic than non-white non-college voters.

Shouldn't the total college grads (white/non-white) be > white college grad %?

White college grads also includes postgrads, whereas the regular college grad excludes postgrads (that is another category in that crosstab).

That would explain it. Postgrads are quite a Democratic group, and have been for a while. Does anyone know why postgrads have always been significantly more Democratic than "normal" college educated folks (like those with bachelor degrees)?
Logged
Florida Man for Crime
The Impartial Spectator
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,922


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #398 on: September 26, 2018, 04:35:29 PM »

How is it possible for Pew's poll to have Democrats up 58 - 39 with white college grads, but then only 57 - 38 with college graduates of all races? Non-white college grads are significantly more Democratic than white college grads, even if they are slightly less Democratic than non-white non-college voters.

Shouldn't the total college grads (white/non-white) be > white college grad %?

White college grads also includes postgrads, whereas the regular college grad excludes postgrads (that is another category in that crosstab).

That would explain it. Postgrads are quite a Democratic group, and have been for a while. Does anyone know why postgrads have always been significantly more Democratic than "normal" college educated folks (like those with bachelor degrees)?

Quick facetious one-liner answer - because they are smarter than regular college grads Wink

Real answer - because the same factors that make college-educated voters more likely to be Democratic also make them more likely to be Democratic, such as being more likely than 4 year college grads to have jobs as "knowledge-worker professionals" which is associated with voting Dem.
Logged
Virginiá
Virginia
Administratrix
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,920
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -6.97, S: -5.91

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #399 on: September 26, 2018, 05:12:05 PM »

Ohhhhhhh! Fair enough. Thank you!
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 11 12 13 14 15 [16] 17 18 19 20 21 ... 75  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.062 seconds with 12 queries.