Early & Absentee Voting Megathread - Build the Freiwal
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 12, 2024, 05:08:37 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  Early & Absentee Voting Megathread - Build the Freiwal
« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 10 11 12 13 14 [15] 16 17 18 19 20 ... 72
Author Topic: Early & Absentee Voting Megathread - Build the Freiwal  (Read 131372 times)
ON Progressive
OntarioProgressive
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,106
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -8.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #350 on: October 22, 2018, 09:29:46 PM »

https://twitter.com/RalstonReports/status/1054558729935323136

Democrats win Washoe by a sizeable margin again. High numbers of votes as well.



Not quite as gaudy as the double digit leads from the first two days, but still D+7. These Washoe numbers are making it very difficult to see Heller winning, even if Clark isn't doing quite as well as expected.
Logged
Xing
xingkerui
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,291
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.52, S: -3.91

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #351 on: October 22, 2018, 09:29:57 PM »

https://twitter.com/RalstonReports/status/1054558729935323136

Democrats win Washoe by a sizeable margin again. High numbers of votes as well.



That's a 7 point win, a little less than before, but an additional 600 votes to the D margin.
Logged
The Vorlon
Vorlon
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,660


Political Matrix
E: 8.00, S: -4.21

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #352 on: October 22, 2018, 10:11:17 PM »
« Edited: October 23, 2018, 05:40:28 AM by Brittain33 »

[Triplicate link deleted - please read the thread guys.]
Logged
Ebsy
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,001
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #353 on: October 22, 2018, 10:13:43 PM »

Please read the thread before posting.
Logged
henster
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,004


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #354 on: October 22, 2018, 10:13:58 PM »

Anybody know what's up with Cuyahoga I read the EV is not even reaching '14 levels there.
Logged
Dr Oz Lost Party!
PittsburghSteel
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,019
United States


P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #355 on: October 22, 2018, 10:15:24 PM »


The guy who runs TargetSmart just slammed NBC on twitter for misinterpreting his data.
Logged
Ebsy
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,001
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #356 on: October 22, 2018, 10:21:39 PM »
« Edited: October 22, 2018, 10:29:49 PM by Ebsy »

Anybody know what's up with Cuyahoga I read the EV is not even reaching '14 levels there.
Ohio party registration isn't particularly useful, but you read incorrectly, as it is currently up 14% over 2014.

The big jump is in unaffiliateds, which due to the 2015 law that changed a bunch of partisan affiliated voters to unaffiliated if they did not vote in the past 4 years, meaning that direct comparisons are not exactly accurate.
Logged
Former Dean Phillips Supporters for Haley (I guess???!?) 👁️
The Impartial Spectator
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,886


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #357 on: October 22, 2018, 10:29:16 PM »
« Edited: October 22, 2018, 10:33:42 PM by Cruz Will Win 👁 »

Here's a round up on final #s for 1st day early voting in many/most of the major big metro counties in TX. Across all these counties, they basically either came very close to 2016 turnout, or even BEAT it:

Austin/Travis County - They beat the 2016 Presidential election... in a midterm...

2018: 47,405
2016: 47,109
2014: 17,181



Houston/Harris County

2018: 63,188
2016: 67,471
2014: 20,215


Dallas/Dallas County

2018: 57,080
2016: 58,775
2014: 13,036




San Antonio/Bexar County

2018: 34,021
2016: 35,431
2014: 13,436




Fort Worth/Tarrant County

2018: 38,430* (apparently unofficial, might increase)
2016: 43,140
2014: 13,466


North Dallas-Fort Worth Suburbs/Denton County - another NUT...

2018: 17,278
2016: 16,963
2014: 5,372







North Austin Suburbs/Williamson County - another NUT...

2018: 20,711
2016: 18,103
2014: 4,267

Logged
Ebsy
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,001
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #358 on: October 22, 2018, 10:34:35 PM »

The Williamson County number is key.
Logged
Former Dean Phillips Supporters for Haley (I guess???!?) 👁️
The Impartial Spectator
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,886


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #359 on: October 22, 2018, 10:41:58 PM »

And as soon as I posted that, we get the BIG news.

South Texas/Hidalgo County

2018: 19,652 --- BEATS 2016 PRESIDENTIAL TURNOUT... IN HIDALGO COUNTY (92% HISPANIC)
2016: 18,526
2014: 9,930


THE HISPANICS ARE VOTING OMG OMG OMG OMG OMG!!!


THE HISPANICS ARE VOTING OMG OMG OMG OMG OMG!!!
Logged
ON Progressive
OntarioProgressive
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,106
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -8.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #360 on: October 22, 2018, 10:44:05 PM »

And as soon as I posted that, we get the BIG news.

South Texas/Hidalgo County

2018: 19,652 --- BEATS 2016 PRESIDENTIAL TURNOUT... IN HIDALGO COUNTY (92% HISPANIC)
2016: 18,526
2014: 9,930

!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Logged
Co-Chair Bagel23
Bagel23
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,369
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.48, S: -1.83

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #361 on: October 22, 2018, 10:48:30 PM »

Guys, chill a bit, don't extrapolate too much, but this is nice to see.
Logged
Former Dean Phillips Supporters for Haley (I guess???!?) 👁️
The Impartial Spectator
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,886


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #362 on: October 22, 2018, 10:49:54 PM »

And as soon as I posted that, we get the BIG news.

South Texas/Hidalgo County

2018: 19,652 --- BEATS 2016 PRESIDENTIAL TURNOUT... IN HIDALGO COUNTY (92% HISPANIC)
2016: 18,526
2014: 9,930

!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

As a precautionary measure, I am changing my username. If this first day of voting is not just a blip and Hispanics actually vote at Presidential + levels, things could get interesting.

Reportedly there was very high turnout in El Paso too (also obviously overwhelmingly Hispanic and Beto's home turf), not sure of the exact numbers but maybe I'll try to check for them now.
Logged
Former Dean Phillips Supporters for Haley (I guess???!?) 👁️
The Impartial Spectator
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,886


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #363 on: October 22, 2018, 10:56:55 PM »

OK, for El Paso I don't have an exact #, but a news article says "more than 15,000" and that it is higher than 2016.

https://www.kvia.com/news/texas/early-voting-in-texas-begins-with-lines-strong-turnout/818526327

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.


El Paso/El Paso County

2018: Unknown HIGHER than 16,117
2016: 16,117
2014: 2,817


So it is more than 5 times 2014 levels...

So yeah, looks like Hispanics are indeed voting (so far), to a MUCH greater extent than I would have expected based on historical turnout.

Truly crazy.
Logged
RI
realisticidealist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,807


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: 2.61

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #364 on: October 22, 2018, 10:57:49 PM »


Dem voter file firm slams story unfavorable to Dems.
Logged
Dr Oz Lost Party!
PittsburghSteel
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,019
United States


P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #365 on: October 22, 2018, 11:06:36 PM »

OK, for El Paso I don't have an exact #, but a news article says "more than 15,000" and that it is higher than 2016.

https://www.kvia.com/news/texas/early-voting-in-texas-begins-with-lines-strong-turnout/818526327

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.


El Paso/El Paso County

2018: Unknown HIGHER than 16,117
2016: 16,117
2014: 2,817


So it is more than 5 times 2014 levels...

So yeah, looks like Hispanics are indeed voting (so far), to a MUCH greater extent than I would have expected based on historical turnout.

Truly crazy.

So it looks like that last-minute surge in enthusiasm amongst Latinos (according to NBC) is coming true. Bodes very well for the Democrats.
Logged
Xing
xingkerui
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,291
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.52, S: -3.91

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #366 on: October 22, 2018, 11:07:48 PM »

These numbers in Texas do look pretty insane, but I'd be curious to see what more rural counties look like. If turnout is extremely high in ruby red Republican territory as well, that doesn't bode nearly as well for Beto.

Some rural counties in Nevada are reporting, and turnout seems higher than Saturday, like in Washoe. Republicans were able to cut into the Democrat margin a bit as a result. While Clark will likely more than offset that, it does present a possible problem for Democrats: High Republican turnout could limit the impact of high Democratic turnout.
Logged
junior chįmp
Mondale_was_an_insidejob
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,394
Croatia
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #367 on: October 22, 2018, 11:09:29 PM »

Praying for Beto
Logged
Ebsy
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,001
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #368 on: October 22, 2018, 11:12:33 PM »

As pointed out by a helpful posted on AAD, you made an error with the Hidalgo county numbers. You seem to be counting in person and by mail for 2018 but only in person for 2016.

Logged
Gass3268
Moderator
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,540
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #369 on: October 22, 2018, 11:21:54 PM »

Should note that Democrats had a pretty decent early vote margin in Texas during the primary and then 500K more Republicans showed up on election day.
Logged
ON Progressive
OntarioProgressive
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,106
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -8.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #370 on: October 22, 2018, 11:25:42 PM »

Should note that Democrats had a pretty decent early vote margin in Texas during the primary and then 500K more Republicans showed up on election day.

They actually lost the early vote in the Texas primary though. The problem was that the Texas SoS only publishes the top 15 counties in population, which are way more Democratic than the state as a whole.
Logged
Former Dean Phillips Supporters for Haley (I guess???!?) 👁️
The Impartial Spectator
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,886


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #371 on: October 22, 2018, 11:28:15 PM »
« Edited: October 22, 2018, 11:31:34 PM by Cruz Will Probably Win 👁 »

As pointed out by a helpful posted on AAD, you made an error with the Hidalgo county numbers. You seem to be counting in person and by mail for 2018 but only in person for 2016.



The Hidalgo #s come from here:



It is not entirely clear, but it sounds like he is saying the 2018 #s are in person only because he says "for day one"? If it were also including absentee mail ballots, then it wouldn't be just for day one - early voting by mail has been going on for days before this.
Logged
I Can Now Die Happy
NYC Millennial Minority
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,949
United States
Political Matrix
E: 4.39, S: -4.70

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #372 on: October 22, 2018, 11:29:27 PM »


You're beto off praying for Joe Donnelly, Claire McCaskill, Bill Nelson, and Kyrsten Sinema.

LOL
Logged
DataGuy
Rookie
**
Posts: 217


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #373 on: October 22, 2018, 11:42:28 PM »

These numbers in Texas do look pretty insane, but I'd be curious to see what more rural counties look like. If turnout is extremely high in ruby red Republican territory as well, that doesn't bode nearly as well for Beto.

Some rural counties in Nevada are reporting, and turnout seems higher than Saturday, like in Washoe. Republicans were able to cut into the Democrat margin a bit as a result. While Clark will likely more than offset that, it does present a possible problem for Democrats: High Republican turnout could limit the impact of high Democratic turnout.

To your comment on Texas, turnout was in fact record-shattering even in small, deeply Republican counties. From the Texas Tribune:

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

https://www.texastribune.org/2018/10/22/texas-early-voting-turnout/

That's a percentage increase of 369% over 2014. (Midland County voted for Trump 75% to 20% in 2016.) By comparison, first-day turnout increased by almost 90% in Dallas County and by 176% in Travis County.

Both Dallas County and Travis County do of course have far more raw votes than Midland, but if smaller Republican counties across the board also see such astonishing spikes in turnout, it could negate any benefit for the Democrats.

Logged
Ebsy
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,001
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #374 on: October 22, 2018, 11:51:57 PM »

The real question is, what was Midland County's early vote on the first day of early voting in 2016? I think we all can agree that 2014 is not the greatest benchmark for this election.
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 10 11 12 13 14 [15] 16 17 18 19 20 ... 72  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.088 seconds with 12 queries.