Any chance of Mueller implicating the left?

[Donald Trump’s Toupée]

Please don't brush it off - Hilary Clinton actually had collusion with Russia. Fake dossier. Steele. Ohr. Strzok. Comey. Fusion GPS. It goes on and on and on. So much corruption in the FBI and DOJ.

What are the chances that Mueller's bombshell will actually be implicating and indicting Hillary Clinton's campaign instead of/in addition to Trump's supposed crimes?

In an ideal world, he should be investigating both. My question is how likely is it that he's actually doing so and holding these cards close to his chest?  

[GeorgiaModerate]

All your talking points about Strzok, Ohr, Fusion, etc. have been thoroughly debunked already, so I'm not going to waste my time rehashing them; if you still believe they show a conspiracy with Clinton, nothing will convince you otherwise.  So I'll just answer the main question. 

What are the chances that Mueller will implicate the left?  I see two:

1. Slim chance

2. Fat chance

[Blair]

Please don't brush it off - Hilary Clinton actually had collusion with Russia. Fake dossier. Steele. Ohr. Strzok. Comey. Fusion GPS. It goes on and on and on. So much corruption in the FBI and DOJ.

What are the chances that Mueller's bombshell will actually be implicating and indicting Hillary Clinton's campaign instead of/in addition to Trump's supposed crimes?

In an ideal world, he should be investigating both. My question is how likely is it that he's actually doing so and holding these cards close to his chest?  

You do know that Steele ran MI6's Russia operation for 10 years?

[Coldstream]

I could see Jill Stein being implicated (though I think she’s more of a UI than a willing collaborator with the Russians).

[Absentee Voting Ghost of Ruin]

There's certainly a good chance that Tony Podesta, and other figures like him end up with charges against them as a result of Mueller's investigation. But none of the Republican conspiracy theores the OP mentions are going to happen. (At least not from Mueller. A more-dictatorial Trump government will have no problem deciding they're all true and locking up political opponents.)

[Hindsight was 2020]

Please don't brush it off - Hilary Clinton actually had collusion with Russia. Fake dossier. Steele. Ohr. Strzok. Comey. Fusion GPS. It goes on and on and on. So much corruption in the FBI and DOJ.

What are the chances that Mueller's bombshell will actually be implicating and indicting Hillary Clinton's campaign instead of/in addition to Trump's supposed crimes?

In an ideal world, he should be investigating both. My question is how likely is it that he's actually doing so and holding these cards close to his chest?  

First, off what the hell has Strzok, Comey, Steele, or Ohr done that is criminal? Second, Mueller’s is a special counsel that is assigned to investigate Trump and his team so anything Hillary has done wouldn’t be his responsibility. And third, how did Hillary “collude” with the Russians?

[DrScholl]

No.

[Person Man]

Leave Hillary alone. Next.

[Nyvin]

The chance is 0%.   You rambled off a bunch of debunked conspiracy theories and said "maybe!?"   That's not a credible argument.

Nothing in dossier has been proven false btw.

[Inmate Trump]

Omg, I was going to come in here and say that I doubt any on the left would be implicated but that if they were I want them prosecuted to the full extent of the law.  Anyone within our government who colludes and conspires (which actually IS illegal no matter what the president says) needs to be found out.

Then I read the OP and realized this topic is not based in seriousness at all.

[longtimelurker]

Please don't brush it off - Hilary Clinton actually had collusion with Russia. Fake dossier. Steele. Ohr. Strzok. Comey. Fusion GPS. It goes on and on and on. So much corruption in the FBI and DOJ.

What are the chances that Mueller's bombshell will actually be implicating and indicting Hillary Clinton's campaign instead of/in addition to Trump's supposed crimes?

In an ideal world, he should be investigating both. My question is how likely is it that he's actually doing so and holding these cards close to his chest?  

QAnon is that way ================================================>

[Badger]

Tee-hee.

[Koharu]

These folks said what I wanted to, only better.

There's certainly a good chance that Tony Podesta, and other figures like him end up with charges against them as a result of Mueller's investigation. But none of the Republican conspiracy theores the OP mentions are going to happen. (At least not from Mueller. A more-dictatorial Trump government will have no problem deciding they're all true and locking up political opponents.)

Omg, I was going to come in here and say that I doubt any on the left would be implicated but that if they were I want them prosecuted to the full extent of the law.  Anyone within our government who colludes and conspires (which actually IS illegal no matter what the president says) needs to be found out.

Then I read the OP and realized this topic is not based in seriousness at all.

[Wells]

Isn't this the conspiracy theory Pizzagaters are onto now? It's a silly one. I'd recommend the OP stop using the Internet until he can use it responsibly.

[Landslide Lyndon]

Yeah, and after Hillary he will indict Cruz and his dad for the JFK assassination.

[Chancellor Tanterterg]

Don't feed the troll

[ProudModerate2]

Is the OP serious?
There are people out there that have been brain-washed to become staunch trump cultists, and believe in twisted theories (such as the ones posted).
So we may have one here.

[twenty42]

Please don't brush it off - Hilary Clinton actually had collusion with Russia. Fake dossier. Steele. Ohr. Strzok. Comey. Fusion GPS. It goes on and on and on. So much corruption in the FBI and DOJ.

What are the chances that Mueller's bombshell will actually be implicating and indicting Hillary Clinton's campaign instead of/in addition to Trump's supposed crimes?

In an ideal world, he should be investigating both. My question is how likely is it that he's actually doing so and holding these cards close to his chest?  

First, off what the hell has Strzok, Comey, Steele, or Ohr done that is criminal? Second, Mueller’s is a special counsel that is assigned to investigate Trump and his team so anything Hillary has done wouldn’t be his responsibility. And third, how did Hillary “collude” with the Russians?

Until we see a transcript of Bill's convo with Loretta Lynch, we will never know if or how much Hillary colluded. As it stands right now, it is pretty much a Schroedinger's Cat situation.

[Karpatsky]

First, you can't implicate a political wing in wrongdoing. Despite the cries of the GOP that the investigation is a political witch hunt, the problem has to do with the crimes committed by people and organizations associated with the right, not with 'the right' itself.

Second, probably not, except:

I could see Jill Stein being implicated (though I think she’s more of a UI than a willing collaborator with the Russians).

While there is reason to believe the Russians were playing both sides as far as hybrid war goes, the publicly available evidence suggests actual collusion was limited to the 'right'.

Please don't brush it off - Hilary Clinton actually had collusion with Russia. Fake dossier. Steele. Ohr. Strzok. Comey. Fusion GPS. It goes on and on and on. So much corruption in the FBI and DOJ.

What are the chances that Mueller's bombshell will actually be implicating and indicting Hillary Clinton's campaign instead of/in addition to Trump's supposed crimes?

In an ideal world, he should be investigating both. My question is how likely is it that he's actually doing so and holding these cards close to his chest?  

First, off what the hell has Strzok, Comey, Steele, or Ohr done that is criminal? Second, Mueller’s is a special counsel that is assigned to investigate Trump and his team so anything Hillary has done wouldn’t be his responsibility. And third, how did Hillary “collude” with the Russians?

Until we see a transcript of Bill's convo with Loretta Lynch, we will never know if or how much Hillary colluded. As it stands right now, it is pretty much a Schroedinger's Cat situation.

Is there reason to believe that Lynch has anything to do with the Russians, or is this just more smokescreen?

[Hindsight was 2020]

Please don't brush it off - Hilary Clinton actually had collusion with Russia. Fake dossier. Steele. Ohr. Strzok. Comey. Fusion GPS. It goes on and on and on. So much corruption in the FBI and DOJ.

What are the chances that Mueller's bombshell will actually be implicating and indicting Hillary Clinton's campaign instead of/in addition to Trump's supposed crimes?

In an ideal world, he should be investigating both. My question is how likely is it that he's actually doing so and holding these cards close to his chest?  

First, off what the hell has Strzok, Comey, Steele, or Ohr done that is criminal? Second, Mueller’s is a special counsel that is assigned to investigate Trump and his team so anything Hillary has done wouldn’t be his responsibility. And third, how did Hillary “collude” with the Russians?

Until we see a transcript of Bill's convo with Loretta Lynch, we will never know if or how much Hillary colluded. As it stands right now, it is pretty much a Schroedinger's Cat situation.

What? What does Lynch have to do with the Russians?

[twenty42]

First, you can't implicate a political wing in wrongdoing. Despite the cries of the GOP that the investigation is a political witch hunt, the problem has to do with the crimes committed by people and organizations associated with the right, not with 'the right' itself.

Second, probably not, except:

I could see Jill Stein being implicated (though I think she’s more of a UI than a willing collaborator with the Russians).

While there is reason to believe the Russians were playing both sides as far as hybrid war goes, the publicly available evidence suggests actual collusion was limited to the 'right'.

Please don't brush it off - Hilary Clinton actually had collusion with Russia. Fake dossier. Steele. Ohr. Strzok. Comey. Fusion GPS. It goes on and on and on. So much corruption in the FBI and DOJ.

What are the chances that Mueller's bombshell will actually be implicating and indicting Hillary Clinton's campaign instead of/in addition to Trump's supposed crimes?

In an ideal world, he should be investigating both. My question is how likely is it that he's actually doing so and holding these cards close to his chest?  

First, off what the hell has Strzok, Comey, Steele, or Ohr done that is criminal? Second, Mueller’s is a special counsel that is assigned to investigate Trump and his team so anything Hillary has done wouldn’t be his responsibility. And third, how did Hillary “collude” with the Russians?

Until we see a transcript of Bill's convo with Loretta Lynch, we will never know if or how much Hillary colluded. As it stands right now, it is pretty much a Schroedinger's Cat situation.

Is there reason to believe that Lynch has anything to do with the Russians, or is this just more smokescreen?

Since we don't know what transpired in the conversation and probably never will, it is impossible to say whether she did or didn't.

[Badger]

First, you can't implicate a political wing in wrongdoing. Despite the cries of the GOP that the investigation is a political witch hunt, the problem has to do with the crimes committed by people and organizations associated with the right, not with 'the right' itself.

Second, probably not, except:

I could see Jill Stein being implicated (though I think she’s more of a UI than a willing collaborator with the Russians).

While there is reason to believe the Russians were playing both sides as far as hybrid war goes, the publicly available evidence suggests actual collusion was limited to the 'right'.

Please don't brush it off - Hilary Clinton actually had collusion with Russia. Fake dossier. Steele. Ohr. Strzok. Comey. Fusion GPS. It goes on and on and on. So much corruption in the FBI and DOJ.

What are the chances that Mueller's bombshell will actually be implicating and indicting Hillary Clinton's campaign instead of/in addition to Trump's supposed crimes?

In an ideal world, he should be investigating both. My question is how likely is it that he's actually doing so and holding these cards close to his chest?  

First, off what the hell has Strzok, Comey, Steele, or Ohr done that is criminal? Second, Mueller’s is a special counsel that is assigned to investigate Trump and his team so anything Hillary has done wouldn’t be his responsibility. And third, how did Hillary “collude” with the Russians?

Until we see a transcript of Bill's convo with Loretta Lynch, we will never know if or how much Hillary colluded. As it stands right now, it is pretty much a Schroedinger's Cat situation.

Is there reason to believe that Lynch has anything to do with the Russians, or is this just more smokescreen?

Since we don't know what transpired in the conversation and probably never will, it is impossible to say whether she did or didn't.

Okay, since you missed the above point, it Bears repeating. Is there any evidence whatsoever that Lynch has anything to do with the Russians, ever?

[GeorgiaModerate]

Loretta Lynch is a Russian?  All this time I thought she was from North Carolina.

[twenty42]

First, you can't implicate a political wing in wrongdoing. Despite the cries of the GOP that the investigation is a political witch hunt, the problem has to do with the crimes committed by people and organizations associated with the right, not with 'the right' itself.

Second, probably not, except:

I could see Jill Stein being implicated (though I think she’s more of a UI than a willing collaborator with the Russians).

While there is reason to believe the Russians were playing both sides as far as hybrid war goes, the publicly available evidence suggests actual collusion was limited to the 'right'.

Please don't brush it off - Hilary Clinton actually had collusion with Russia. Fake dossier. Steele. Ohr. Strzok. Comey. Fusion GPS. It goes on and on and on. So much corruption in the FBI and DOJ.

What are the chances that Mueller's bombshell will actually be implicating and indicting Hillary Clinton's campaign instead of/in addition to Trump's supposed crimes?

In an ideal world, he should be investigating both. My question is how likely is it that he's actually doing so and holding these cards close to his chest?  

First, off what the hell has Strzok, Comey, Steele, or Ohr done that is criminal? Second, Mueller’s is a special counsel that is assigned to investigate Trump and his team so anything Hillary has done wouldn’t be his responsibility. And third, how did Hillary “collude” with the Russians?

Until we see a transcript of Bill's convo with Loretta Lynch, we will never know if or how much Hillary colluded. As it stands right now, it is pretty much a Schroedinger's Cat situation.

Is there reason to believe that Lynch has anything to do with the Russians, or is this just more smokescreen?

Since we don't know what transpired in the conversation and probably never will, it is impossible to say whether she did or didn't.

Okay, since you missed the above point, it Bears repeating. Is there any evidence whatsoever that Lynch has anything to do with the Russians, ever?

Maybe, maybe not. Why haven't the contents of the conversation ever been released if there wasn't something shady there?

[Hindsight was 2020]

First, you can't implicate a political wing in wrongdoing. Despite the cries of the GOP that the investigation is a political witch hunt, the problem has to do with the crimes committed by people and organizations associated with the right, not with 'the right' itself.

Second, probably not, except:

I could see Jill Stein being implicated (though I think she’s more of a UI than a willing collaborator with the Russians).

While there is reason to believe the Russians were playing both sides as far as hybrid war goes, the publicly available evidence suggests actual collusion was limited to the 'right'.

Please don't brush it off - Hilary Clinton actually had collusion with Russia. Fake dossier. Steele. Ohr. Strzok. Comey. Fusion GPS. It goes on and on and on. So much corruption in the FBI and DOJ.

What are the chances that Mueller's bombshell will actually be implicating and indicting Hillary Clinton's campaign instead of/in addition to Trump's supposed crimes?

In an ideal world, he should be investigating both. My question is how likely is it that he's actually doing so and holding these cards close to his chest?  

First, off what the hell has Strzok, Comey, Steele, or Ohr done that is criminal? Second, Mueller’s is a special counsel that is assigned to investigate Trump and his team so anything Hillary has done wouldn’t be his responsibility. And third, how did Hillary “collude” with the Russians?

Until we see a transcript of Bill's convo with Loretta Lynch, we will never know if or how much Hillary colluded. As it stands right now, it is pretty much a Schroedinger's Cat situation.

Is there reason to believe that Lynch has anything to do with the Russians, or is this just more smokescreen?

Since we don't know what transpired in the conversation and probably never will, it is impossible to say whether she did or didn't.

Okay, since you missed the above point, it Bears repeating. Is there any evidence whatsoever that Lynch has anything to do with the Russians, ever?

Maybe, maybe not. Why haven't the contents of the conversation ever been released if there wasn't something shady there?

So your just making something up and throwing a ? at the end to avoid any responsibility for what you just posted?