2018 Congressional Generic Ballot/House Polls Megathread 2 - no debates please

[OneJ]

Really? A Trump +11 sample is what they came up with in Montana? I was just about to get excited...

[Landslide Lyndon]

Really? A Trump +11 sample is what they came up with in Montana? I was just about to get excited...

Maybe some people are too embarrassed to admit they voted for Trump.

[GlobeSoc]

Really? A Trump +11 sample is what they came up with in Montana? I was just about to get excited...

electorates can change composition, especially when going from a presidential to a midterm election

[Gass3268]

That Colorado number is brutal for Coffman. A number like that might even put CO-03 in play.

[LimoLiberal]

Wow. Diane Harkey (R) internal in CA-49 shows her leading Mike Levin by 3 points.

http://www.rollcall.com/news/politics/internal-poll-harkey-has-slight-lead-over-levin-in-californias-49th-district

You must be logged in to read this quote.

You must be logged in to read this quote.

Levin (D) - 43
Harkey (R) - 46

/trolling deleted

[LimoLiberal]

Of all the competitive seats in California, CA-49 was last on my list to see a Republican leading in a poll.

[Dr Oz Lost Party!]

LL posted a Harkey internal showing her up three points and called it disasterous for Democrats, for those who don’t want to unignore him and see.

[Ebsy]

I'm still confused why he was allowed back on this board.

[Interlocutor is just not there yet]

LL posted a Harkey internal showing her up three points and called it disasterous for Democrats, for those who don’t want to unignore him and see.

Thank you! I'm guessing because it's 3.5 months out and the Republican is within the margin of error in their own internals, he's saying the Democrats are sh**t out of luck this year?

[LimoLiberal]

LL posted a Harkey internal showing her up three points and called it disasterous for Democrats, for those who don’t want to unignore him and see.

Thank you! I'm guessing because it's 3.5 months out and the Republican is within the margin of error in their own internals, he's saying the Democrats are sh**t out of luck this year?

CA-49 is supposed to be one of the easiest seats for Ds to pickup this year. Even if this internal was literally the best case scenario for Harkey, it shouldn't be a Republican lead. Clinton +9 open seat with a well funded Democratic opponent.

[Landslide Lyndon]

LL posted a Harkey internal showing her up three points and called it disasterous for Democrats, for those who don’t want to unignore him and see.

Thanks. Next time just mention the numbers. Nobody cares about Andrew's editorializing.

[BudgieForce]

And by the way, we had a CA-49 poll last week that had Levin up three points. Its a toss up.

[GeorgiaModerate]

LL posted a Harkey internal showing her up three points and called it disasterous for Democrats, for those who don’t want to unignore him and see.

Thanks. Next time just mention the numbers. Nobody cares about Andrew's editorializing.

I agree.  The numbers are useful to know, but there's no need to mention Limo's comments.  There's a reason we're ignoring him.

[LimoLiberal]

And by the way, we had a CA-49 poll last week that had Levin up three points. Its a toss up.

Well that's news to the Cook Political Report and Sabato's Crystal Ball.

[Gass3268]

No internal poll is going to push this seat off of Lean D.

[IceSpear]

No internal poll is going to push this seat off of Lean D.

This. Also, whoever took Andrew off mod review should be demodded.

[Dr Oz Lost Party!]

LL posted a Harkey internal showing her up three points and called it disasterous for Democrats, for those who don’t want to unignore him and see.

Thanks. Next time just mention the numbers. Nobody cares about Andrew's editorializing.

I agree.  The numbers are useful to know, but there's no need to mention Limo's comments.  There's a reason we're ignoring him.

Silly me! I can't do anything right! Shame on myself for being a complete dumbass.

You'll take what I give you.

[BlueDogs2020]

This topic is for posting and analyzing the results of the large collection of polls conducted from the following districts, as tweeted by Nate Cohn of Upshot who said they should be out early next week;

https://twitter.com/Nate_Cohn/status/1017061499960020992

[Bidenworth2020]

great!

[wesmoorenerd]

Hnnnnnggggg

[GeorgiaModerate]

I was wondering what happened to these polls.  Last week he tweeted that they'd probably be up this week.

[McGovernForPrez]

Don't tease me like that. I've been waiting on this drop all week.

[ON Progressive]

MI-13 Dem primary (Target Insyght for MIRS):

Brenda Jones 21
William Wild 20
Rashida Tlaib 19
Coleman Young 14
Ian Conyers 8 (LOL)
Shanelle Jackson 4

Undecided 14

https://www.scribd.com/document/384312798/MI-13-Target-Insyght-for-MIRS-July-2018

MI-11 Dem primary (also Target Insyght for MIRS)
Haley Stevens 21
Suneel Grupta 15
Tim Greimel 14
Fayrouz Saad 7
Daniel Haberman 4

Undecided 39

https://www.scribd.com/document/384312848/MI-11-Target-Insyght-for-MIRS-July-2018

[LimoLiberal]

Well...

Reuters Ipsos 7/15-19

Democrats - 41 (-5)
Republicans - 37 (+4)

compared to 7/10-14 poll

[BudgieForce]

Reuters Ipsos 7/15-19

Democrats - 41 (-5)
Republicans - 37 (+4)

compared to 7/10-14 poll

Another huge swing from Ipsos for absolutely no reason. More reason to ignore online trackers.

Edit: Although I'm not sure where said results are.

http://polling.reuters.com/#poll/TM1212Y17/filters/PD1:1