states that trend republican in 2020
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 16, 2024, 07:16:21 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Presidential Election Trends (Moderator: 100% pro-life no matter what)
  states that trend republican in 2020
« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2
Author Topic: states that trend republican in 2020  (Read 4322 times)
christian peralta
Rookie
**
Posts: 232
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: May 15, 2018, 07:18:33 PM »

Which state will swung more republican in 2020?
Logged
redjohn
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,698
United States


Political Matrix
E: -3.35, S: -4.17

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: May 15, 2018, 08:45:04 PM »

I think the vast majority of states will trend at least a little Democratic in 2020, but in terms of places swinging Republican, Utah will probably have a decent Republican swing. DC will almost certainly swing Republican, too.
Logged
ηєω ƒяσηтιєя
New Frontier
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,395
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.42, S: -1.22

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: May 15, 2018, 11:25:33 PM »

I think that most states will trend more Democratic in 2020. I guess like redjohn said Utah might lean more R but outside of that state, I'm not really seeing where else.
Logged
Senator Spark
Spark498
Atlas Politician
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,698
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: May 15, 2018, 11:46:28 PM »

Utah
Logged
cvparty
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,099
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: May 16, 2018, 06:32:34 AM »

it doesn't work like that guys a vast majority of states can't trend democratic (barring some funky situation like solely california swinging 20% republican)

I'm thinking CA, MD, FL, HI, MS
Logged
redjohn
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,698
United States


Political Matrix
E: -3.35, S: -4.17

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: May 16, 2018, 09:46:05 AM »

it doesn't work like that guys a vast majority of states can't trend democratic (barring some funky situation like solely california swinging 20% republican)

I'm thinking CA, MD, FL, HI, MS

Sorry, was thinking of swings rather than trends! Nonetheless, Utah will trend R, as will probably Mississippi, California (unless Harris is the nominee), and Maryland
Logged
Politician
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,986
United States


Political Matrix
E: -0.13, S: -0.87

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: May 16, 2018, 03:52:09 PM »

TX, UT, and possibly MA and CA. GA and AZ trend less Democratic than the nation as a whole due to wealthy suburban Republicans "coming home".
Logged
Starry Eyed Jagaloon
Blairite
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,835
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: May 16, 2018, 07:46:18 PM »

TX, UT, and possibly MA and CA. GA and AZ trend less Democratic than the nation as a whole due to wealthy suburban Republicans "coming home".
No. California isn't maxed for the Dems yet. There is more room to grow in the Central Valley and suburban counties around LA. Just wait for Orange to crack 70% Dems. Also, I thing Georgia is voting Dem in 2020. Arizona is toss-up.
Logged
The Undefeatable Debbie Stabenow
slightlyburnttoast
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,049
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.42, S: -5.43

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: May 28, 2018, 07:54:39 PM »

MA. Trended D in 04’, 08’, 2012, and 2016. Probably reverts a little bit to the mean relative to the national climate in 2020.
MA actually trended to the right pretty hard in 2008 (~28% left of the nation in 2004 and ~19% left of the nation in 2008). Every Northeastern state except for CT and VT trended right in 2008, but MA did so the hardest. Of course, at least some of this can be probably be attributed to MA native Kerry being the Democratic nominee in 2004.

It did trend pretty hard to the left in 2016 though (~19% left of the nation in 2012 and ~25% left of the nation in 2016), so your hypothesis very well might remain correct despite the small inaccuracy.
Logged
President Punxsutawney Phil
TimTurner
Atlas Politician
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 42,246
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: May 28, 2018, 07:56:33 PM »

Hawaii is a very likely candidate.
Logged
Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers
olawakandi
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 90,500
Jamaica
Political Matrix
E: -6.84, S: -0.17

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: June 01, 2018, 06:13:18 PM »

FL, and Iowa definately.
Logged
The Undefeatable Debbie Stabenow
slightlyburnttoast
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,049
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.42, S: -5.43

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: June 01, 2018, 06:20:42 PM »

I agree with FL, but why IA? Trump’s approvals in IA are particularly bad compared to his 2016 margin there, and Clinton was generally considered to be a very poor fit for the state.
Logged
Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers
olawakandi
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 90,500
Jamaica
Political Matrix
E: -6.84, S: -0.17

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: June 01, 2018, 07:34:54 PM »

Booker and Gillibrand will make a play for OH and VA,  with Tim Ryan as Veep,  leaves Iowa out of mix.  But, that's not to say,  that Ryan can't bring Iowa into play.


Blue wall is MI,  PA,  WI,  CO,  NV, NM,  and NH. 
Logged
Yellowhammer
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,695
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: June 02, 2018, 05:47:28 AM »

Blue wall is MI,  PA,  WI,  CO,  NV, NM,  and NH.  
Lol, just keep thinking this way. I'm sure Trump will never break through your indestructible rust belt blue wall! 2016 didn't really happen.
Logged
Mr. Illini
liberty142
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,865
United States


Political Matrix
E: -4.26, S: -3.30

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: June 02, 2018, 10:38:11 AM »

Utah is a good answer. Maybe Florida as well.
Logged
Thunder98
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,574
United States


P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: June 02, 2018, 10:41:14 AM »

Utah is a good answer. Maybe Florida as well.

Especially If Pinallas County goes over the 50% mark for Trump. Which is a 50/50 chance of happening.
Logged
dw93
DWL
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,914
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: June 02, 2018, 03:49:56 PM »

If it's a two person race, then Texas. Latinos in Texas are more conservative than average and the Black Vote isn't large, and I don't see why Whites in Texas would be equally or more opposed to Trump in 2020 than they were in 2016, given the fact that Trump has pushed a pretty conventional Republican agenda, particularly on Taxes, Regulation, and Abortion.
Logged
Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers
olawakandi
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 90,500
Jamaica
Political Matrix
E: -6.84, S: -0.17

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: June 02, 2018, 08:22:02 PM »

Blue wall is MI,  PA,  WI,  CO,  NV, NM,  and NH.  


Lol, just keep thinking this way. I'm sure Trump will never break through your indestructible rust belt blue wall! 2016 didn't really happen.


Of course he can break through,  but Democrats will have Democratic governors,  as reinforcements, unlike last time.

Tim Ryan can help in Iowa,  NV,  and Virginia
Logged
Yellowhammer
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,695
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: June 03, 2018, 01:02:22 PM »

Of course he can break through,  but Democrats will have Democratic governors,  as reinforcements, unlike last time.
Well Pennsylvania had a dem governor in 2016 and that sure didn't stop Trump from winning it.
New Mexico and Illinois both had republican governors and Hillary had no trouble winning in either.
The party of a state's governor does not determine how that state will vote in a presidential election, and really has little direct influence at all.
Logged
Person Man
Angry_Weasel
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,718
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #19 on: June 03, 2018, 04:49:47 PM »

Of course he can break through,  but Democrats will have Democratic governors,  as reinforcements, unlike last time.
Well Pennsylvania had a dem governor in 2016 and that sure didn't stop Trump from winning it.
New Mexico and Illinois both had republican governors and Hillary had no trouble winning in either.
The party of a state's governor does not determine how that state will vote in a presidential election, and really has little direct influence at all.

That was the only close state that did!
Logged
Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers
olawakandi
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 90,500
Jamaica
Political Matrix
E: -6.84, S: -0.17

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #20 on: June 04, 2018, 05:34:21 PM »
« Edited: June 04, 2018, 05:55:47 PM by Cory Booker »

Of course he can break through,  but Democrats will have Democratic governors,  as reinforcements, unlike last time.
Well Pennsylvania had a dem governor in 2016 and that sure didn't stop Trump from winning it.
New Mexico and Illinois both had republican governors and Hillary had no trouble winning in either.
The party of a state's governor does not determine how that state will vote in a presidential election, and really has little direct influence at all.

Walker certainly helped Ron Johnson win reelection over Russ Feingold.  Kasich helped his friend Rob Portman, to some degree it does. And Rubio helped Trump, with Cubans in Florida

Iowa will trend republican in 2020
Logged
morgankingsley
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,040
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #21 on: June 04, 2018, 07:10:32 PM »

I think Minnesota and New Hampshire would flip blue actually. Utah as well. Georgia I say. Maine. And MAYBE Oregon, Washington, and California
Logged
100% pro-life no matter what
ExtremeRepublican
Moderator
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,809


Political Matrix
E: 7.35, S: 5.57


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #22 on: June 04, 2018, 09:04:31 PM »

I actually expect a decent dead-cat bounce for Republicans in California.  Largely, I think most 2016 trends will reverse themselves in 2020, as Trump has been closer to Generic R on most policies.  So, the map might look more like 2012 with some uniform swing (with a few exceptions like VA and IA) than 2016 with a uniform swing.
Logged
5280
MagneticFree
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,404
United States


Political Matrix
E: 6.97, S: -0.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #23 on: June 04, 2018, 09:14:01 PM »

Utah
Idaho
Iowa
Logged
RINO Tom
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,073
United States


Political Matrix
E: 2.45, S: -0.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #24 on: June 05, 2018, 09:48:16 AM »


I'd be shocked if Iowa trended R.
Logged
Pages: [1] 2  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.058 seconds with 13 queries.