NixonNow vs. KillerPollo
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 29, 2024, 04:52:57 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Forum Community
  Forum Community
  Forum Community Election Match-ups (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, YE, KoopaDaQuick 🇵🇸)
  NixonNow vs. KillerPollo		 « previous next »
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Who would you vote for/who would win?
#1
Assad/Assad		  
#2
Assad/KillerPollo		  
#3
KillerPollo/Assad		  
#4
KillerPollo/KillerPollo		  
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results
Total Voters: 15

Author Topic: NixonNow vs. KillerPollo  (Read 1087 times)
nini2287
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,616


Political Matrix
E: 2.77, S: -3.39

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: September 25, 2005, 01:56:06 AM »
option 1
Logged
Ebowed
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,596


Political Matrix
E: 4.13, S: 2.09

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: September 25, 2005, 02:33:08 AM »
NixonNow/NixonNow
Logged
Platypus
hughento
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,478
Australia


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: September 25, 2005, 03:47:29 AM »
NixonNow would win; I wouldn't vote.
Logged
CheeseWhiz
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,538


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: September 25, 2005, 06:35:22 AM »

^^^^^

But, if I had to vote, I'd say NixonNow, since there is a few times when he can be a productive member.
Logged
Jake
dubya2004
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,621
Cuba


Political Matrix
E: -0.90, S: -0.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: September 25, 2005, 12:14:08 PM »
NixonNow is fine and would be a decent President, the dirty Mexican is just human trash.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.025 seconds with 14 queries.