GOP adviser made his ex-fiancee a sex slave

[Landslide Lyndon]

WHAT THE FYCK IS WRONG WITH THESE PEOPLE???

https://www.reviewjournal.com/news/politics-and-government/nevada/ex-fiancee-says-las-vegas-gop-campaign-adviser-made-her-his-slave/

“A Las Vegas political adviser who worked on national campaigns and high-profile Nevada races sexually enslaved and battered his ex-fiancée before police responded to a domestic dispute,”

“The 46-year-old woman provided copies of emails, text messages and a signed contract laying out her duties as a ‘slave in training’ to Benjamin Sparks.”

“Sparks and his ex-fiancée signed a five-page contract stating that she would be his ‘slave and property.’ Under the contract, the woman was forced to kneel and look down when she entered his presence, be nude at all times, have sexual relations with him whenever he wanted and wear a collar in private.”

[mvd10]

lol

[Fuzzy Bear]

The Rapture of the Church might well occur this afternoon.

That's pretty depraved.  Sadly, I'm not surprised that this could happen.

[I spent the winter writing songs about getting better]

Sounds like a BDSM thing.

But it also sounds like it wasn't exactly consensual so he's scum.

[Torie]

More relevant than this absurd unenforceable "contract," is what he actually did to her in carrying out its "terms." In the gay community, some guys are into bondage, and sometimes even insist upon it. Odd, but that is the way it is. But yeah, just on the existence of the "contract" alone, I would fire his ass myself.

[BlueSwan]

Trump would get a pass, right evangelicals?

[Absentee Voting Ghost of Ruin]

WHAT THE FYCK IS WRONG WITH THESE PEOPLE???

https://www.reviewjournal.com/news/politics-and-government/nevada/ex-fiancee-says-las-vegas-gop-campaign-adviser-made-her-his-slave/

“A Las Vegas political adviser who worked on national campaigns and high-profile Nevada races sexually enslaved and battered his ex-fiancée before police responded to a domestic dispute,”

“The 46-year-old woman provided copies of emails, text messages and a signed contract laying out her duties as a ‘slave in training’ to Benjamin Sparks.”

“Sparks and his ex-fiancée signed a five-page contract stating that she would be his ‘slave and property.’ Under the contract, the woman was forced to kneel and look down when she entered his presence, be nude at all times, have sexual relations with him whenever he wanted and wear a collar in private.”

As I keep saying, one of the silver linings to the Misadministration of President Madman (R-Moscow) is how he's gotten Republicans to drop the act and admit who they really are. Republic of Gilead, here we come! (At least if the GOP is left in power.)

[KingSweden]

JFC

[I spent the winter writing songs about getting better]

More relevant than this absurd unenforceable "contract," is what he actually did to her in carrying out its "terms." In the gay community, some guys are into bondage, and sometimes even insist upon it. Odd, but that is the way it is. But yeah, just on the existence of the "contract" alone, I would fire his ass myself.

BDSM contracts like this aren't meant to be legally binding. Their purpose is part symbolic and part setting expectations that both parties consent to. The issue here is the woman was obviously coerced and it wasn't consensual.

The woman probably signed the "contract" agreeing to (almost certainly wanting to) do those things but at some point he crossed the line or she changed her mind in which case the "contract" is meaningless and he coerced her. Which makes him scum obviously.

[here2view]

FaMiLy VaLuEs

[Person Man]

Sounds like a BDSM thing.

But it also sounds like it wasn't exactly consensual so he's scum.

[America's Sweetheart ❤/𝕿𝖍𝖊 𝕭𝖔𝖔𝖙𝖞 𝖂𝖆𝖗𝖗𝖎𝖔𝖗]

If this was consensual then obviously there's no issue here, but it would appear it wasn't so this dude is a major HP.

[Santander]

Hot.

[America Needs a 13-6 Progressive SCOTUS]

Apparently, this predator is currently working as an advisory for one of the Republican candidates in NM-02.

[7,052,770]

More relevant than this absurd unenforceable "contract," is what he actually did to her in carrying out its "terms." In the gay community, some guys are into bondage, and sometimes even insist upon it. Odd, but that is the way it is. But yeah, just on the existence of the "contract" alone, I would fire his ass myself.

BDSM contracts like this aren't meant to be legally binding. Their purpose is part symbolic and part setting expectations that both parties consent to. The issue here is the woman was obviously coerced and it wasn't consensual.

The woman probably signed the "contract" agreeing to (almost certainly wanting to) do those things but at some point he crossed the line or she changed her mind in which case the "contract" is meaningless and he coerced her. Which makes him scum obviously.

From the article, it looks like the breaking point was when he asked her to sleep with other men in front of him.

This guy is such a loser that he tried but failed to become a cuck.

[Middle-aged Europe]

Fifty Shades of GOP.

[Virginiá]

From the article, it looks like the breaking point was when he asked her to sleep with other men in front of him.

This guy is such a loser that he tried but failed to become a cuck.

Wait until it breaks that this request was meant to be Cresent Hardy campaign event

I wonder if this whole ordeal will be used against him.

[DavidB.]

Wow, so much kinkshaming here! It's the current year, folx.

[ProudModerate2]

FaMiLy VaLuEs

[Sprouts Farmers Market ✘]

Wow, so much kinkshaming here! It's the current year, folx.

[Chunk Yogurt for President!]

Even if it was consensual it would still be degenerate.

[Goldwater]

Sounds like a BDSM thing.

But it also sounds like it wasn't exactly consensual so he's scum.

[Sprouts Farmers Market ✘]

Even if it was consensual it would still be degenerate.

There is nothing degenerate about sexual relations within a church-recognized marriage.

[Chunk Yogurt for President!]

Even if it was consensual it would still be degenerate.

There is nothing degenerate about sexual relations within a church-recognized marriage.

Sex slavery and BDSM are not normal sexual relations.

[Ban my account ffs!]

Even if it was consensual it would still be degenerate.

There is nothing degenerate about sexual relations within a church-recognized marriage.

Sex slavery and BDSM are not normal sexual relations.

What you allow yourself as "normal sexual relations" might just be seen as a form of sex slavery by someone else.  This guy had a contract, you have "normal sexual relations". 

The holier you get, the more you become enslaved to your own self-righteousness.