2018 Congressional Recruitment/Fundraising/Ratings Megathread v2
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 03, 2024, 07:48:45 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  2018 Congressional Recruitment/Fundraising/Ratings Megathread v2
« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 5 6 7 8 9 [10] 11 12 13 14 15 ... 76
Author Topic: 2018 Congressional Recruitment/Fundraising/Ratings Megathread v2  (Read 172985 times)
Dr Oz Lost Party!
PittsburghSteel
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,047
United States


P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #225 on: April 23, 2018, 08:27:04 AM »



Damn.
Logged
LimoLiberal
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,535


Political Matrix
E: -3.71, S: -4.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #226 on: April 23, 2018, 08:33:27 AM »

Isn't the Virginia primary in just over a month? It doesn't look like Freitas is gonna have the resources to stop Stewart from being the standard bearer. Which is bad news for Scott Taylor

It would help if we got some actual polling.
Logged
The Other Castro
Castro2020
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,230
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #227 on: April 23, 2018, 09:58:33 AM »
« Edited: April 23, 2018, 10:20:58 AM by Castro »

Districts where the top Democrat outraised the top Republican, had more Cash on Hand, did both, or came within $100K:



Some notable competitive districts missing from this chart:

CA-10, CA-21, IL-06, GA-06, MN-03, PA-01, VA-10, WA-08.
Logged
Young Conservative
youngconservative
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,031
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #228 on: April 23, 2018, 12:45:39 PM »

Districts where the top Democrat outraised the top Republican, had more Cash on Hand, did both, or came within $100K:



Some notable competitive districts missing from this chart:

CA-10, CA-21, IL-06, GA-06, MN-03, PA-01, VA-10, WA-08.
I don't think Democrats win VA-10 or WA-08. I think there are more Republican districts that are way easier than those two, highly expensive markets with strong, moderate GOP candidates. It simply would make more sense for democrats to target weak incumbents in cheap media markets even if they are nominally more R in regards to CPVI.
Logged
Chancellor Tanterterg
Mr. X
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,658
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #229 on: April 23, 2018, 12:48:20 PM »

Districts where the top Democrat outraised the top Republican, had more Cash on Hand, did both, or came within $100K:



Some notable competitive districts missing from this chart:

CA-10, CA-21, IL-06, GA-06, MN-03, PA-01, VA-10, WA-08.
I don't think Democrats win VA-10 or WA-08. I think there are more Republican districts that are way easier than those two, highly expensive markets with strong, moderate GOP candidates. It simply would make more sense for democrats to target weak incumbents in cheap media markets even if they are nominally more R in regards to CPVI.

You guys might get really lucky and hold WA-8, but I highly doubt it.  VA-10 is long gone for you guys though, the question is whether or not Comstock loses by double-digits.
Logged
YE
Modadmin
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,949


Political Matrix
E: -4.90, S: -0.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #230 on: April 23, 2018, 12:52:17 PM »

Having a moderate candidate only takes you so far in a bad mid term. Sure it helps but it’s not a life saver. Ask the Blue Dogs in 2010.
Logged
Tartarus Sauce
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,361
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #231 on: April 23, 2018, 01:37:39 PM »
« Edited: April 23, 2018, 07:40:43 PM by Tartarus Sauce »

Districts where the top Democrat outraised the top Republican, had more Cash on Hand, did both, or came within $100K:



Some notable competitive districts missing from this chart:

CA-10, CA-21, IL-06, GA-06, MN-03, PA-01, VA-10, WA-08.
I don't think Democrats win VA-10 or WA-08. I think there are more Republican districts that are way easier than those two, highly expensive markets with strong, moderate GOP candidates. It simply would make more sense for democrats to target weak incumbents in cheap media markets even if they are nominally more R in regards to CPVI.
Democratic enthusiasm and fundraising has been so turbocharged that there is no good reason for them to preemptively surrender in expensive media markets in competitive seats that have heavily trended their way the past decade, and to claim that it would be good strategy for them to do so is patently absurd.

I know you have an infatuation with Comstock being a vicious fighter holding a vulnerable seat, but the elections in Virginia last November made it very, very clear which direction her district is heading. Her district is permanently realigning leftward like the rest of NoVA, the environment will be way too anti-Republican come November, and her district is way too anti-Trump for her to survive. The writing is on the wall, it's just a question of whether you want to accept it or not.
Logged
The Other Castro
Castro2020
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,230
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #232 on: April 23, 2018, 06:08:27 PM »

Oh also, I forgot to add PA-04 to the list of districts where Dems have the most CoH and best 1Q.
Logged
Nyvin
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,693
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #233 on: April 24, 2018, 10:53:59 AM »

Districts where the top Democrat outraised the top Republican, had more Cash on Hand, did both, or came within $100K:



Some notable competitive districts missing from this chart:

CA-10, CA-21, IL-06, GA-06, MN-03, PA-01, VA-10, WA-08.
I don't think Democrats win VA-10 or WA-08. I think there are more Republican districts that are way easier than those two, highly expensive markets with strong, moderate GOP candidates. It simply would make more sense for democrats to target weak incumbents in cheap media markets even if they are nominally more R in regards to CPVI.

Comstock is not a moderate.
Logged
Young Conservative
youngconservative
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,031
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #234 on: April 24, 2018, 12:28:59 PM »

Districts where the top Democrat outraised the top Republican, had more Cash on Hand, did both, or came within $100K:



Some notable competitive districts missing from this chart:

CA-10, CA-21, IL-06, GA-06, MN-03, PA-01, VA-10, WA-08.
I don't think Democrats win VA-10 or WA-08. I think there are more Republican districts that are way easier than those two, highly expensive markets with strong, moderate GOP candidates. It simply would make more sense for democrats to target weak incumbents in cheap media markets even if they are nominally more R in regards to CPVI.

Comstock is not a moderate.
The Washington Post disagrees.
Logged
Chancellor Tanterterg
Mr. X
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,658
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #235 on: April 24, 2018, 12:31:30 PM »

Districts where the top Democrat outraised the top Republican, had more Cash on Hand, did both, or came within $100K:



Some notable competitive districts missing from this chart:

CA-10, CA-21, IL-06, GA-06, MN-03, PA-01, VA-10, WA-08.
I don't think Democrats win VA-10 or WA-08. I think there are more Republican districts that are way easier than those two, highly expensive markets with strong, moderate GOP candidates. It simply would make more sense for democrats to target weak incumbents in cheap media markets even if they are nominally more R in regards to CPVI.

Comstock is not a moderate.
The Washington Post disagrees.

And?
Logged
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,840
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #236 on: April 25, 2018, 02:25:54 AM »

I’d like to point out that Paul Penzone won AZ-6 by 7% per Miles.

Paging DCCC

Yeah, Dems would've just gotten a victory if it was Schweikert who resigned.
Logged
Gass3268
Moderator
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,573
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #237 on: April 25, 2018, 10:37:31 AM »

New Crystal Ball rating changes coming tomorrow in response to AZ-08:

Logged
KingSweden
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,227
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #238 on: April 25, 2018, 10:51:56 AM »

I’d like to point out that Paul Penzone won AZ-6 by 7% per Miles.

Paging DCCC

Yeah, Dems would've just gotten a victory if it was Schweikert who resigned.

Do we have anybody in AZ-6?
Logged
MAINEiac4434
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,269
France


Political Matrix
E: -7.42, S: -8.78

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #239 on: April 25, 2018, 10:54:48 AM »

I’d like to point out that Paul Penzone won AZ-6 by 7% per Miles.

Paging DCCC

Yeah, Dems would've just gotten a victory if it was Schweikert who resigned.

Do we have anybody in AZ-6?
Two Some Guys: Garrick McFadden and Anita Malik:

https://anitaforarizona.com/
https://www.electgarrick.com/
Logged
Holy Unifying Centrist
DTC
Atlas Politician
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,231


Political Matrix
E: 9.53, S: 10.54

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #240 on: April 25, 2018, 11:53:10 AM »

I’d like to point out that Paul Penzone won AZ-6 by 7% per Miles.

Paging DCCC

Yeah, Dems would've just gotten a victory if it was Schweikert who resigned.

Do we have anybody in AZ-6?
Two Some Guys: Garrick McFadden and Anita Malik:

https://anitaforarizona.com/
https://www.electgarrick.com/

Thankfully, there's still about a month left until the filing deadline. Perhaps a stronger candidate who was encouraged by yesterday's results may jump in.

Lol what? Anita is similar to Hiral Tipinerni. It's not like anyone knew who Tipinerni was before the campaign, and she ended up making a great impression on people.
Logged
Jeppe
Bosse
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,805
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -4.13, S: -4.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #241 on: April 25, 2018, 05:34:40 PM »

Not sure how you guys missed Heather Ross, but she's the Democrat who's raised the most money by far in AZ-06.

Heather Ross (D) - $229,336
Garrick McFadden (D) - $68,814
Anita Malik (D) - $64,139

She seems highly qualified, and is another healthcare practicioner like Tipirneni. Ross is also running on a very "issues-oriented" campaign (she doesn't mention being a Democrat or Trump even once in her campaign website). Aside from her outdated campaign website, I don't have any complaints about her.

https://www.heatherforaz.com/
Logged
Horus
Sheliak5
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,989
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #242 on: April 25, 2018, 05:38:48 PM »

Not sure how you guys missed Heather Ross, but she's the Democrat who's raised the most money by far in AZ-06.

Heather Ross (D) - $229,336
Garrick McFadden (D) - $68,814
Anita Malik (D) - $64,139

She seems highly qualified, and is another healthcare practicioner like Tipirneni. Ross is also running on a very "issues-oriented" campaign (she doesn't mention being a Democrat or Trump even once in her campaign website). Aside from her outdated campaign website, I don't have any complaints about her.

https://www.heatherforaz.com/

I thought you left Atlas?
Logged
Doimper
Doctor Imperialism
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,030


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #243 on: April 25, 2018, 11:21:12 PM »

Not sure how you guys missed Heather Ross, but she's the Democrat who's raised the most money by far in AZ-06.

Heather Ross (D) - $229,336
Garrick McFadden (D) - $68,814
Anita Malik (D) - $64,139

She seems highly qualified, and is another healthcare practicioner like Tipirneni. Ross is also running on a very "issues-oriented" campaign (she doesn't mention being a Democrat or Trump even once in her campaign website). Aside from her outdated campaign website, I don't have any complaints about her.

https://www.heatherforaz.com/

I thought you left Atlas?

A lot of people have """left""" Atlas.
Logged
GeorgiaModerate
Moderator
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 33,132


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #244 on: April 26, 2018, 07:39:12 AM »

Crystal Ball makes 15 rating changes, 14 in favor of Democrats (AZ-08 being the other).

http://www.centerforpolitics.org/crystalball/articles/raising-the-ceiling-but-not-the-floor-on-potential-democratic-house-gains/
Logged
Gass3268
Moderator
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,573
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #245 on: April 26, 2018, 08:29:53 AM »


Logged
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,840
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #246 on: April 26, 2018, 08:52:49 AM »
« Edited: April 26, 2018, 09:04:34 AM by IceSpear »

I'm not sure why you'd move tons of safe Rs to likely Rs while adjusting hardly any other categories. Baby steps I guess.

Seriously, is it that hard to see that VA-10, CA-10, etc. are leans D (at least) in the same universe that districts like VA-07 is only "leans R" or CA-04 (!!!) is merely "likely R"?

muh incumbency truly is the fatal flaw of these pundits and why they ALWAYS underestimate waves, especially early on.
Logged
Brittain33
brittain33
Moderator
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,048


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #247 on: April 26, 2018, 09:30:39 AM »

I'm not sure why you'd move tons of safe Rs to likely Rs while adjusting hardly any other categories. Baby steps I guess.

I can understand it as purely a reaction to AZ-8 and looking at comparable "Safe R" seats.
Logged
LimoLiberal
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,535


Political Matrix
E: -3.71, S: -4.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #248 on: April 26, 2018, 11:23:33 AM »

I'm not sure why you'd move tons of safe Rs to likely Rs while adjusting hardly any other categories. Baby steps I guess.

I can understand it as purely a reaction to AZ-8 and looking at comparable "Safe R" seats.

Maybe so, but no one should take any “expert” at all seriously if they still have VA-10 at tossup at this point LOL

They probably want to see some more polling from VA-10... I think the DCCC internal had Wexton leading Comstock 46-43 in February.
Logged
America Needs a 13-6 Progressive SCOTUS
Solid4096
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,760


Political Matrix
E: -8.88, S: -8.51

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #249 on: April 26, 2018, 11:45:46 AM »

I'm not sure why you'd move tons of safe Rs to likely Rs while adjusting hardly any other categories. Baby steps I guess.

I can understand it as purely a reaction to AZ-8 and looking at comparable "Safe R" seats.

Maybe so, but no one should take any “expert” at all seriously if they still have VA-10 at tossup at this point LOL

Having WA-08 at tossup is even stupider.
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 5 6 7 8 9 [10] 11 12 13 14 15 ... 76  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.066 seconds with 9 queries.