Washington Post Top 10 House Seats Most Likely to Flip in November
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 01, 2024, 10:44:03 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  Washington Post Top 10 House Seats Most Likely to Flip in November
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Washington Post Top 10 House Seats Most Likely to Flip in November  (Read 903 times)
LimoLiberal
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,535


Political Matrix
E: -3.71, S: -4.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: March 18, 2018, 08:29:43 PM »

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2018/03/18/the-top-10-house-races-of-2018/?__twitter_impression=true&utm_term=.af0af2d38eb9


1. PA-05
2. FL-27
3. NJ-02
4. PA-06
5. MN-08
6. VA-10
7. AZ-02
8. MN-02
9. IA-01
10. CA-39

WHAT IS THIS BOTH SIDES BULLsh**t!?!?!?!?! WHAT MENTALLY INEBRIATED WASHINGTON POST WRITER DECIDED THAT MINNESOTAS 8TH CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT, WHICH HAS BEEN DEMOCRATIC SINCE THE BEGINNING OF TIME, IS MORE LIKELY TO FLIP THAN A CLINTON+10 DISTRICT IN A MASSIVELY PRO DEMOCRATIC ENVIRONMENT.

i actually think the rest of the list is pretty good, though i would switch CA-49 for CA-39 based off past results and the limited polling we have.
Logged
MAINEiac4434
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,269
France


Political Matrix
E: -7.42, S: -8.78

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: March 18, 2018, 08:31:45 PM »

>No ME-02

Garbage list.
Logged
Dr. MB
MB
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,868
Libyan Arab Jamahiriya



Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: March 18, 2018, 08:35:41 PM »
« Edited: March 18, 2018, 08:55:11 PM by MB »

Don't trust this "most likely to flip" nonsense.

First of all, I think putting MN-02 after MN-08 is utterly ridiculous. Second of all, only one CA district? 7 California districts voted for Clinton.

There are about 20 House seats that are just as likely to flip as #s 5–10 on this list.
Logged
Oryxslayer
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,803


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: March 18, 2018, 08:36:39 PM »
« Edited: March 18, 2018, 08:40:00 PM by Oryxslayer »

Seriously, MN-08 needs to get off the list. The rest is kinda fine, and there is a clear trend: marginal seats all the way to strong dem seats preferably open with good candidates. With that in mind, I would remove IA-01 and put CA-49 somewhere on the list, and also stick PA-17 on the list if it technically counts. MN-08 should get off the list, and MN-01 should enter if we are considering R pickups.

Yeah and like the article says, while 4-10 are arguable, 1-3 are really not. PA-05 and FL-27 are simply now safe D seats without any real R competition, and NJ-02 is pretty much Van Drew's already thanks to his record in NJ.
Logged
Gass3268
Moderator
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,528
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: March 18, 2018, 08:42:03 PM »

Seriously, MN-08 needs to get off the list. The rest is kinda fine, and there is a clear trend: marginal seats all the way to strong dem seats preferably open with good candidates. With that in mind, I would remove IA-01 and put CA-49 somewhere on the list, and also stick PA-17 on the list if it technically counts. MN-08 should get off the list, and MN-01 should enter if we are considering R pickups.

Yeah, I feel like for these "most likely to flip" lists they always feel like they need to include a Democratic seat. MN-01 would make more sense.
Logged
ProgressiveCanadian
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,690
Canada


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: March 18, 2018, 09:04:51 PM »

There should be no Democratic seats on this list.
Logged
Tekken_Guy
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,005
United States


P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: March 18, 2018, 09:10:52 PM »

Several obvious flips missing: IL-6, NJ-11, CA-49, WA-8, MN-3, NJ-7, CO-6
Logged
Pericles
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,111


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: March 18, 2018, 10:03:04 PM »

My list.
1. FL-27
2. PA-05
3. CA-49
4. NJ-02
5. PA-06
6. VA-10
7. CA-10
8. AZ-02
9. MN-08
10. CA-39
Logged
Tartarus Sauce
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,357
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: March 19, 2018, 12:41:13 AM »

Honestly, it's pretty much impossible to rank a top 10 from my perspective simply given how large the potential playing field is for Democrats. There are different categories of vulnerability, but ranking each seat in a discrete sequence of probable turnover is way too arbitrary to mean anything substantial.

I agree that no Democratic seat should be on the list, though the area currently covered by Minnesota-8 is definitely going to be one of the most vulnerable to a Republican takeover once Democrats are back in power. Jim Oberstar losing in 2010 was just the beginning, Nolan barely managed to hang onto the seat in 2014 and 2016 and Trump won it by a 15% margin.
Logged
Badger
badger
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 40,317
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: March 19, 2018, 01:04:17 AM »

Somehow I just knew they were going to have to include at least one Democratic seat to avoid the inevitable accusations of being slanted, regardless of all empirical evidence to the contrary.

I have to admit, I'm impressed that they only limited themselves to one.
Logged
Beet
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,915


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: March 19, 2018, 01:10:38 AM »

Fun fact: at the start of the 2006 cycle, PA-06 was rated as the 2nd most likely to flip. It didn't.
Logged
Bidenworth2020
politicalmasta73
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,407
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: March 19, 2018, 01:15:24 AM »

Fun fact: at the start of the 2006 cycle, PA-06 was rated as the 2nd most likely to flip. It didn't.
it wasnt even close, 60-39.
Logged
YE
Modadmin
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,755


Political Matrix
E: -4.90, S: -0.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: March 19, 2018, 01:17:51 AM »

Fun fact: at the start of the 2006 cycle, PA-06 was rated as the 2nd most likely to flip. It didn't.
it wasnt even close, 60-39.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_House_of_Representatives_elections_in_Pennsylvania,_2006#6th_Congressional_district

No it was a one point win in a rematch from 2004.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.037 seconds with 11 queries.