1992 Clinton vs Perot (no Bush)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 04, 2024, 02:02:11 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Election What-ifs?
  Past Election What-ifs (US) (Moderator: Dereich)
  1992 Clinton vs Perot (no Bush)
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: 1992 Clinton vs Perot (no Bush)  (Read 1085 times)
UnselfconsciousTeff
Rookie
**
Posts: 238
Egypt


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: January 17, 2018, 05:51:17 PM »

1992: Bush knows that the economy is a disaster. He steps out of the race and endorsed Ross Perot How would this election turn out? You pick the VPs. Discuss, with maps. List both the PV and the EV.
Logged
Former Senator Haslam2020
Haslam2020
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,345
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: January 17, 2018, 06:03:09 PM »

I believe Perot would just run on the Republican Party ticket with a slightly more protectionist platform. Something like Bush decides not to run for re-election due to “family issues”, and beats VP Quayle, Sen. Dole, and Pat Robertson for the GOP Nomination. Bill Clinton wins the Dem. Nomination. His first choice for VP, Lee Hamilton declines and eventually endorses Perot. So, Perot/Campbell beats Clinton/Bradley.

Logged
GM Team Member and Senator WB
weatherboy1102
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,875
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.61, S: -7.83

P
WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: January 17, 2018, 06:22:05 PM »

Assuming Bush drops out during the race...

Although some Bush voters go to Clinton, most go to Perot. Clinton is pretty much toast.

Ross Perot/James Stockdale: 55.87%, 323 EV
Bill Clinton/Al Gore: 43.79%, 215 EV
Other: .34%

(Basically any state Clinton got 45% or more in, plus some others, stay, while the rest go Perot)
Perot still forms the Reform Party, who takes a sizable chunk of the House and Senate. In Perot's second term, he is able to end the Electoral College, move Election days to the first Saturday in November, and get a nationalized health care system. James Stockdale is elected President in 2000, although he isn't as popular as Perot was.
Logged
Orthogonian Society Treasurer
CommanderClash
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,561
Bermuda


Political Matrix
E: 0.32, S: 4.78

P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: January 17, 2018, 07:09:28 PM »



Perot/Dole - 303 EV
Clinton/Gore - 235 EV
Logged
Sir Mohamed
MohamedChalid
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,754
United States



Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: January 18, 2018, 02:35:41 AM »

In this case, Perot runs on a more protectionist platform as GOP nominee. However, Clinton symobizes something new and wins.



✓ Governor Bill Clinton (D-AR)/Senator Al Gore (D-TN): 322 EVs.; 50.9%
Businessman Ross Perot (R-TX)/Former Congressman Jack Kemp (R-NY): 216 EVs.; 46.3%
Logged
dw93
DWL
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,881
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: January 18, 2018, 04:04:02 PM »

Clinton wins a closer race than he did.
Logged
bagelman
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,624
United States


Political Matrix
E: -4.90, S: -4.17

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: January 18, 2018, 08:22:35 PM »

Perot would make it far closer than Bush I, but with his prowess of lying about his own stances for political gain and the fact that his opponent's a billionaires Clinton could still win it.
Logged
America Needs R'hllor
Parrotguy
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,442
Israel


Political Matrix
E: -4.13, S: -3.48

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: January 19, 2018, 08:27:54 AM »

Assuming Bush drops out during the race...

Although some Bush voters go to Clinton, most go to Perot. Clinton is pretty much toast.

Ross Perot/James Stockdale: 55.87%, 323 EV
Bill Clinton/Al Gore: 43.79%, 215 EV
Other: .34%

(Basically any state Clinton got 45% or more in, plus some others, stay, while the rest go Perot)
Perot still forms the Reform Party, who takes a sizable chunk of the House and Senate. In Perot's second term, he is able to end the Electoral College, move Election days to the first Saturday in November, and get a nationalized health care system. James Stockdale is elected President in 2000, although he isn't as popular as Perot was.

Um, no. That would get a huge backlash from the Jewish community and would be considered an antisemitic move to block Jews from voting, considering the fact that religious Jews can't drive in Shabbat (Saturday).
Logged
Lechasseur
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,772


Political Matrix
E: -0.52, S: 3.13

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: January 22, 2018, 09:15:55 AM »

I believe Perot would just run on the Republican Party ticket with a slightly more protectionist platform. Something like Bush decides not to run for re-election due to “family issues”, and beats VP Quayle, Sen. Dole, and Pat Robertson for the GOP Nomination. Bill Clinton wins the Dem. Nomination. His first choice for VP, Lee Hamilton declines and eventually endorses Perot. So, Perot/Campbell beats Clinton/Bradley.



This
Logged
America's Sweetheart ❤/𝕿𝖍𝖊 𝕭𝖔𝖔𝖙𝖞 𝖂𝖆𝖗𝖗𝖎𝖔𝖗
TexArkana
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,385
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: January 22, 2018, 11:40:18 AM »

Perot wins in an upset against Clinton (see 2016)
I doubt it.
Also, why do people have him doing so well in the South?
Logged
Mr. Smith
MormDem
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 33,247
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: January 22, 2018, 12:47:46 PM »



Clinton/Gore
Perot/Kemp
Logged
The Govanah Jake
Jake Jewvinivisk
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,234


Political Matrix
E: -2.39, S: -5.30

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: January 22, 2018, 02:08:11 PM »


I don't think he would do that badly in the south however I think this map gets the idea. Perot doing better in the west and most areas of the Northeast.
Logged
bagelman
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,624
United States


Political Matrix
E: -4.90, S: -4.17

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: January 22, 2018, 09:55:39 PM »

I divided votes for Bush by 10, then added them to votes for Perot which had been increased by 117.64%. This produces a tie election at 49.63% each.



Clinton wins, he flips all gray states and takes DE, MA, RI, VT, and MO in that order with less than 5% margin of victory.

Perot wins, he flips CA and MI, almost certainly IA, then flips only PA at less than 5% margin of victory.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.051 seconds with 12 queries.