clair mccaskill 2020???

[hunter gatherer]

   I was thinking clair mccaskill would make great presidential candidate in 2020, I was looking up some of her you tube videos holy sh**t she bitched slapped orin hatch healthcare, shes really smart, she's a good senator you can tell by listening to her that she is someone who has really done her homework, she's from a republican leaning state and she's surprisingly liberal. if she came out in favor of some sort of single payer Medicare healthcare plan I would strongly consider supporting her for president in 2020!! what do you guys think?

[Bidenworth2020]

I already did something like this, lmfao

[hunter gatherer]

I already did something like this, lmfao

lol,great minds think a like.

[Dr. MB]

No. She's only a half decent senator.

[Fuzzy Bear]

McCaskill is the kind of Democrat that serious Democrats ought to be thinking about if they are, indeed, serious about defeating Trump.  She has the potential of expanding the map, she is experienced, she has a record that is liberal without being avant garde, and she has some appeal to the WWC voters who the Democrats need in order to recapture lost ground in 2016.  And while she's won in unusually favorable circumstances, she's still won in a state that's trending Republican in every way, but which has the capacity to trend toward Democrats if only they could get part of their act together.

I keep hearing Democrats go on and on about how Trump is this National Disaster of Unparalleled Proportions.  If he is, than why are some arguing about whether or not so-and-so is sufficiently "progressive"?  If Trump's THAT BAD, aren't we beyond that?  Isn't it time for a unity ticket that can win as big as possible?  I mean, if we've actually elected the Antichrist, why would we quibble about trivial things such as the Keystone Pipeline vote or whether or not someone was Janie-Come-Lately on SSM?  Aren't those things trivial compared to the Trumpageddon we are now facing?  Let's fish or cut bait here.  If Trump's THAT BAD, Democrats focusing on the most electable candidate might actually be the patriotic thing, even if there may be some tut-tutting from the farthest left.

[beaver2.0]

Hopefully not.  While I think a rust belt Democrat is a good idea, maybe one with more charisma.

[America's Sweetheart ❤/𝕿𝖍𝖊 𝕭𝖔𝖔𝖙𝖞 𝖂𝖆𝖗𝖗𝖎𝖔𝖗]

No. She lacks charisma and isn't going to make Missouri go blue.

[OkThen]

If she's able to pull off a win in 2018 then I think she has a credible case to run. Will she make it through the primary? Probably not.

[isoscelessquare]

She'd have to pull off a win in her 2018 race to be in any position to make a run. Even if she does manage to win, she doesn't really bring anything unique to the table in a year where there's gonna be at least a dozen contenders for the Dem nomination.

[jamestroll]

This topic comes up every month or so.

No.

[RussFeingoldWasRobbed]

Please no..... One of the worst democrats in the senate.

[GoTfan]

Sure, if you want a left wing third party challenge that'll cost you the election.

[hunter gatherer]

Sure, if you want a left wing third party challenge that'll cost you the election.

I will only support her if she supports medicare for all.

No. She lacks charisma and isn't going to make Missouri go blue.

Please no..... One of the worst democrats in the senate.

This topic comes up every month or so.

No.

thanks for ruining my dream scenario you guys