Post Random US Election County Maps Here
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 08, 2024, 04:50:57 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Election What-ifs? (Moderator: Dereich)
  Post Random US Election County Maps Here
« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 11 12 13 14 15 [16] 17 18 19 20 21 ... 28
Author Topic: Post Random US Election County Maps Here  (Read 64829 times)
MATTROSE94
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,791
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -5.29, S: -6.43

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #375 on: February 25, 2018, 08:45:16 AM »

A 5% universal swing to Bill Clinton would have been enough for him to win Colorado, Virginia, North Carolina, Georgia, South Carolina, Mississippi, Alabama, Texas, Oklahoma, Montana, Indiana, North Dakota, and South Dakota, so I assume he wins those states in the map.
Logged
Metalhead123
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 264


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #376 on: February 25, 2018, 01:04:48 PM »

A 5% universal swing to Bill Clinton would have been enough for him to win Colorado, Virginia, North Carolina, Georgia, South Carolina, Mississippi, Alabama, Texas, Oklahoma, Montana, Indiana, North Dakota, and South Dakota, so I assume he wins those states in the map.
wrong. Just Georgia, Colorado, Virginia, Montana, South Dakota, North Carolina, and Texas. Mississippi comes within 0.13 percent of flipping.
Logged
Metalhead123
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 264


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #377 on: February 25, 2018, 04:49:11 PM »



This is the election results of the 1982 senate elections.

Logged
CookieDamage
cookiedamage
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,150


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #378 on: February 25, 2018, 06:23:31 PM »

How do you guys calculate posts like 5% swing to Nixon, 10% swing to Hillary? Plus, more importantly, how do y'all put that into map form/how do you know what counties to flip? Thanks, since I'd like to make some of these types of maps on my own.
just divide the percentage by two, add half of it to one candidate and talk half from another. For example, let’s say you want to do a 5% swing to Walter Mondale. What you would do is add 2.5% to Mondale and take 2.5% from Reagan.

Thanks! Do you guesstimate which counties go to whom? Or do you do it by state and use past elections as references? So if I did a ~% swing to Hillary and it made her win Pennsylvania, I'll just flip the most likely counties that would have enabled a win?
I do it by state using previous elections. You would flip whatever country margins fall into the amount ur swinging to

Thanks!
Logged
America's Sweetheart ❤/𝕿𝖍𝖊 𝕭𝖔𝖔𝖙𝖞 𝖂𝖆𝖗𝖗𝖎𝖔𝖗
TexArkana
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,385
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #379 on: February 25, 2018, 07:18:52 PM »



This is the election results of the 1982 senate elections.


This is so cool. Could you maybe do this for other years as well? Specifically pre-'82 if you can find the data.
Logged
America Needs a 13-6 Progressive SCOTUS
Solid4096
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,762


Political Matrix
E: -8.88, S: -8.51

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #380 on: February 25, 2018, 07:20:02 PM »



Guess
Logged
America's Sweetheart ❤/𝕿𝖍𝖊 𝕭𝖔𝖔𝖙𝖞 𝖂𝖆𝖗𝖗𝖎𝖔𝖗
TexArkana
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,385
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #381 on: February 25, 2018, 07:22:48 PM »

Some sort of swing to HRC in 2016.
Logged
America Needs a 13-6 Progressive SCOTUS
Solid4096
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,762


Political Matrix
E: -8.88, S: -8.51

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #382 on: February 25, 2018, 07:41:02 PM »


Correct. Guess the level of the swing.
Logged
Metalhead123
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 264


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #383 on: February 25, 2018, 08:24:53 PM »



This is the election results of the 1982 senate elections.


This is so cool. Could you maybe do this for other years as well? Specifically pre-'82 if you can find the data.
Im thinking about doing 1978.
Logged
America's Sweetheart ❤/𝕿𝖍𝖊 𝕭𝖔𝖔𝖙𝖞 𝖂𝖆𝖗𝖗𝖎𝖔𝖗
TexArkana
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,385
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #384 on: February 26, 2018, 01:11:20 AM »



This is the election results of the 1982 senate elections.


This is so cool. Could you maybe do this for other years as well? Specifically pre-'82 if you can find the data.
Im thinking about doing 1978.
That would be awesome.
Logged
_
Not_Madigan
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,103
United States


Political Matrix
E: -3.29, S: -7.74

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #385 on: February 26, 2018, 03:04:58 PM »

Alternate 2010 Races (Part 2)
Connecticut Senate Race

Rob Simmons (R):  55.31%
Chris Dodd (D-inc):  43.59%
Other:  1.10%

(Next will be an alternate CA-Sen and NY-Sen Special, then moving on to Alternate Governors)
Logged
America's Sweetheart ❤/𝕿𝖍𝖊 𝕭𝖔𝖔𝖙𝖞 𝖂𝖆𝖗𝖗𝖎𝖔𝖗
TexArkana
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,385
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #386 on: February 26, 2018, 04:06:06 PM »

Looks like a 5% swing.
Logged
America Needs a 13-6 Progressive SCOTUS
Solid4096
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,762


Political Matrix
E: -8.88, S: -8.51

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #387 on: February 26, 2018, 04:51:55 PM »

Wrong. Higher than 5%.
Logged
America's Sweetheart ❤/𝕿𝖍𝖊 𝕭𝖔𝖔𝖙𝖞 𝖂𝖆𝖗𝖗𝖎𝖔𝖗
TexArkana
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,385
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #388 on: February 26, 2018, 05:07:10 PM »

Well it's not a 10% swing, so is it a 7  or 8% swing?
Logged
America Needs a 13-6 Progressive SCOTUS
Solid4096
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,762


Political Matrix
E: -8.88, S: -8.51

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #389 on: February 26, 2018, 05:11:56 PM »

9% swing of only the 2-party vote.
Logged
Metalhead123
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 264


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #390 on: February 27, 2018, 11:27:00 AM »


This is so cool. Could you maybe do this for other years as well? Specifically pre-'82 if you can find the data.
Im thinking about doing 1978.
That would be awesome.
here ya go
Logged
America's Sweetheart ❤/𝕿𝖍𝖊 𝕭𝖔𝖔𝖙𝖞 𝖂𝖆𝖗𝖗𝖎𝖔𝖗
TexArkana
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,385
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #391 on: February 27, 2018, 10:24:25 PM »


This is so cool. Could you maybe do this for other years as well? Specifically pre-'82 if you can find the data.
Im thinking about doing 1978.
That would be awesome.
here ya go
Beautiful Titanium D Alabama.
Logged
_
Not_Madigan
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,103
United States


Political Matrix
E: -3.29, S: -7.74

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #392 on: February 28, 2018, 01:31:41 PM »

2010 Alternate Races (Part 3)
New York Special Senate Race

Peter King (R):  48.92%
Kirsten Gillibrand (D-inc):  48.82%
Other:  2.26%

California Senate Race

Barbara Boxer (D-inc):  47.52%
Steve Poizner (R):  47.47%
Other:  5.01%

(Next up is alternate Gubernatorial Elections)
Logged
America's Sweetheart ❤/𝕿𝖍𝖊 𝕭𝖔𝖔𝖙𝖞 𝖂𝖆𝖗𝖗𝖎𝖔𝖗
TexArkana
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,385
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #393 on: February 28, 2018, 06:48:01 PM »



What if the Democratic nominee won literally every county?
Logged
Calthrina950
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,919
United States


P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #394 on: February 28, 2018, 11:42:53 PM »


It is amazing to see how strong the Democrats still were in the South, on the downballot level, at this time. Mind you, this was more than a decade after the Civil Rights Act.
Logged
America's Sweetheart ❤/𝕿𝖍𝖊 𝕭𝖔𝖔𝖙𝖞 𝖂𝖆𝖗𝖗𝖎𝖔𝖗
TexArkana
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,385
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #395 on: February 28, 2018, 11:44:56 PM »


It is amazing to see how strong the Democrats still were in the South, on the downballot level, at this time. Mind you, this was more than a decade after the Civil Rights Act.
The Deep South was still favorable to Democrats at the state level until the early 2000's for the most part.
Logged
Calthrina950
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,919
United States


P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #396 on: February 28, 2018, 11:45:56 PM »


It is amazing to see how strong the Democrats still were in the South, on the downballot level, at this time. Mind you, this was more than a decade after the Civil Rights Act.
The Deep South was still favorable to Democrats at the state level until the early 2000's for the most part.

Yes I know, but it's still interesting to see.

As to your other map, it is also interesting. I wonder if you plan on doing a map for if the Republicans won every county.
Logged
America's Sweetheart ❤/𝕿𝖍𝖊 𝕭𝖔𝖔𝖙𝖞 𝖂𝖆𝖗𝖗𝖎𝖔𝖗
TexArkana
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,385
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #397 on: February 28, 2018, 11:51:16 PM »


It is amazing to see how strong the Democrats still were in the South, on the downballot level, at this time. Mind you, this was more than a decade after the Civil Rights Act.
The Deep South was still favorable to Democrats at the state level until the early 2000's for the most part.

Yes I know, but it's still interesting to see.

As to your other map, it is also interesting. I wonder if you plan on doing a map for if the Republicans won every county.
I do, I'm working on it now. I currently have about 15 states done but I can already tell that the Deep South and Texas are going to be tricky because of the traditonal Democratic strongholds of South Texas and the Black Belt. For instance, in the 1998 Texas Gubernatorial Election, George W. Bush won with almost 70% of the vote statewide, but Duval County still voted over 70% Democrat.
Logged
Calthrina950
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,919
United States


P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #398 on: February 28, 2018, 11:55:28 PM »


It is amazing to see how strong the Democrats still were in the South, on the downballot level, at this time. Mind you, this was more than a decade after the Civil Rights Act.
The Deep South was still favorable to Democrats at the state level until the early 2000's for the most part.

Yes I know, but it's still interesting to see.

As to your other map, it is also interesting. I wonder if you plan on doing a map for if the Republicans won every county.
I do, I'm working on it now. I currently have about 15 states done but I can already tell that the Deep South and Texas are going to be tricky because of the traditonal Democratic strongholds of South Texas and the Black Belt. For instance, in the 1998 Texas Gubernatorial Election, George W. Bush won with almost 70% of the vote statewide, but Duval County still voted over 70% Democrat.

That is an issue. I would guess than when you were making the Democratic sweep map, the staunchly Republican counties out on the Great Plains (in Western Nebraska and North Texas particularly, like King County), were also very challenging.

Logged
America's Sweetheart ❤/𝕿𝖍𝖊 𝕭𝖔𝖔𝖙𝖞 𝖂𝖆𝖗𝖗𝖎𝖔𝖗
TexArkana
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,385
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #399 on: March 01, 2018, 12:00:23 AM »


It is amazing to see how strong the Democrats still were in the South, on the downballot level, at this time. Mind you, this was more than a decade after the Civil Rights Act.
The Deep South was still favorable to Democrats at the state level until the early 2000's for the most part.

Yes I know, but it's still interesting to see.

As to your other map, it is also interesting. I wonder if you plan on doing a map for if the Republicans won every county.
I do, I'm working on it now. I currently have about 15 states done but I can already tell that the Deep South and Texas are going to be tricky because of the traditonal Democratic strongholds of South Texas and the Black Belt. For instance, in the 1998 Texas Gubernatorial Election, George W. Bush won with almost 70% of the vote statewide, but Duval County still voted over 70% Democrat.

That is an issue. I would guess than when you were making the Democratic sweep map, the staunchly Republican counties out on the Great Plains (in Western Nebraska and North Texas particularly, like King County), were also very challenging.


With the Democratic sweep map, I used quite a few older elections (Texas is the 1964 Attorney General race, for instance) so it wasn't much of an issue. I did have to do some swings for existing races though, which I will likely have to do with the GOP sweep map as well. However, in the case of states like Mississippi and Alabama, the Republican would end up getting 85%+ of the vote if I swing existing elections so that they win every county, which is obviously absurd, but fits well considering these states are already solidly R and the GOP nominee must be winning over 80% of the national PV to win every county.
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 11 12 13 14 15 [16] 17 18 19 20 21 ... 28  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.091 seconds with 10 queries.