Why do people think nuclear war is unwinnable?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 17, 2024, 07:28:38 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  Why do people think nuclear war is unwinnable?
« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2 3
Author Topic: Why do people think nuclear war is unwinnable?  (Read 2583 times)
HillGoose
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,973
United States


Political Matrix
E: 1.74, S: -8.96

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: December 04, 2017, 04:46:33 PM »

Is it because that's what communists teach children as they're growing up? America could win a nuclear war if:

1. The government poured money into research and development on global missile defense
and
2. We had a faster trigger than the enemy

So why is it that most Americans associate nuclear war with certain obliteration?
Logged
🦀🎂🦀🎂
CrabCake
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,379
Kiribati


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: December 04, 2017, 04:49:00 PM »

Most people still believe Mutually Assured Destruction is official US policy, for whatever reason.
Logged
Old Man Willow
ShadowOfTheWave
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,718
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: December 04, 2017, 04:50:24 PM »

Is it because that's what communists teach children as they're growing up? America could win a nuclear war if:

1. The government poured money into research and development on global missile defense
and
2. We had a faster trigger than the enemy

So why is it that most Americans associate nuclear war with certain obliteration?


Why do you want to destroy Russia?
Logged
Kamala
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,499
Madagascar


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: December 04, 2017, 04:56:16 PM »

Any "victory" resulting from nuclear war would be so Pyrrhic that it could hardly be called one.
Logged
Inmate Trump
GWBFan
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,143


Political Matrix
E: -4.39, S: -7.30

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: December 04, 2017, 05:17:49 PM »

Even a military victory would still result in a loss in terms of the impact a nuclear war would have on the planet and its citizens.
Logged
Beet
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,067


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: December 04, 2017, 05:22:32 PM »

Far smaller wars fought with far less destructive wars proved unwinnable. If one nuke goes off in the middle of a Chicago killing 1 million people it would be the worst event in U.S. history. The real question is, why are people suddenly so bloodthirsty?
Logged
Beet
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,067


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: December 04, 2017, 05:24:42 PM »

Most people still believe Mutually Assured Destruction is official US policy, for whatever reason.

It’s okay, if 20 cities are destroyed it’s just a flesh wound, the Libya intervention was worse! The important thing is to KILL.
Logged
HillGoose
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,973
United States


Political Matrix
E: 1.74, S: -8.96

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: December 04, 2017, 05:26:56 PM »

Is it because that's what communists teach children as they're growing up? America could win a nuclear war if:

1. The government poured money into research and development on global missile defense
and
2. We had a faster trigger than the enemy

So why is it that most Americans associate nuclear war with certain obliteration?


Why do you want to destroy Russia?

because they are the antithesis to Western Democracy, and seek nothing short of our total annihilation. Why do you want to do nothing while they chip away at our society?
Logged
Mr. Reactionary
blackraisin
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,878
United States


Political Matrix
E: 5.45, S: -3.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: December 04, 2017, 05:37:14 PM »

Unfunny troll is unfunny.
Logged
Santander
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,083
United Kingdom


Political Matrix
E: 4.00, S: 2.61


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: December 04, 2017, 05:38:18 PM »

This is the reason why I had this guy on ignore for a month already.
Logged
Strudelcutie4427
Singletxguyforfun
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,375
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: December 04, 2017, 05:49:01 PM »

Is it because that's what communists teach children as they're growing up? America could win a nuclear war if:

1. The government poured money into research and development on global missile defense
and
2. We had a faster trigger than the enemy

So why is it that most Americans associate nuclear war with certain obliteration?


Dont fight with Russia. Now nuclear war against north korea... South Korea will be an island by the time we're through with Fat Boy
Logged
Stand With Israel. Crush Hamas
Ray Goldfield
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,114


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: December 04, 2017, 05:55:23 PM »
« Edited: December 04, 2017, 09:06:54 PM by THIS MACHINE CRUSHES REGRESSIVES »

A nuclear war with a small, belligerent nuclear power like North Korea is 100% winnable, but not without a high price (if not for us, then for the surrounding ally nations).

A global power like Russia or China is very different.
Logged
Kamala
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,499
Madagascar


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: December 04, 2017, 05:57:08 PM »

I'm glad there are still people who will cheer on the murder of millions of innocent people.
Logged
SoLongAtlas
VirginiaModerate
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,219
United States
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: December 04, 2017, 06:06:31 PM »

Because BMD isn't 100% effective even under perfect scenarios and ineffective against mass launches. Nuclear war isn't winnable in the conventional sense, only a phyrric victory with hundreds of millions dead and more to follow due to radiation sickness and starvation on a planetary scale - the US feeds many countries via its ag exports, negated after a war.

Go watch The Day After for a brief glimpse.
Logged
Virginiá
Virginia
Administratrix
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,921
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -6.97, S: -5.91

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: December 04, 2017, 06:19:03 PM »

Any "victory" resulting from nuclear war would be so Pyrrhic that it could hardly be called one.

Just knowing their smouldering pile of rubble is better than the enemy's smouldering pile of rubble is good enough for some Tongue
Logged
Middle-aged Europe
Old Europe
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,292
Ukraine


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: December 04, 2017, 06:30:29 PM »

You know when fluoridation first began? 1946. How does that coincide with your post-war Commie conspiracy, huh? It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way a hard-core Commie works.
Logged
🦀🎂🦀🎂
CrabCake
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,379
Kiribati


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: December 04, 2017, 06:34:28 PM »

Most people still believe Mutually Assured Destruction is official US policy, for whatever reason.

It’s okay, if 20 cities are destroyed it’s just a flesh wound, the Libya intervention was worse! The important thing is to KILL.

I disagree with the existence of nuclear weapons, but the idea that one state using nuclear weapons in any way would automatically lead to every country jizzing their nukes all over the place is baloney.
Logged
Beet
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,067


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: December 04, 2017, 06:36:03 PM »

Most people still believe Mutually Assured Destruction is official US policy, for whatever reason.

It’s okay, if 20 cities are destroyed it’s just a flesh wound, the Libya intervention was worse! The important thing is to KILL.

I disagree with the existence of nuclear weapons, but the idea that one state using nuclear weapons in any way would automatically lead to every country jizzing their nukes all over the place is baloney.

No one knows what would happen. Anyone who claims they know with complete certainty what would happen is certainly a liar. The point is that any such scenario would be catastrophic beyond any any foreign policy action in recent memory.

The notion that "yuk yuk, well life on earth wouldn't be eliminated, ya yokels, so calm down" doesn't work.
Logged
Mr. Smith
MormDem
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 33,544
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: December 04, 2017, 06:37:16 PM »



Logged
Absentee Voting Ghost of Ruin
Runeghost
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,654


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #19 on: December 04, 2017, 07:37:33 PM »

Is it because that's what communists teach children as they're growing up? America could win a nuclear war if:

1. The government poured money into research and development on global missile defense
and
2. We had a faster trigger than the enemy

So why is it that most Americans associate nuclear war with certain obliteration?

Logged
HillGoose
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,973
United States


Political Matrix
E: 1.74, S: -8.96

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #20 on: December 04, 2017, 08:06:03 PM »

Any "victory" resulting from nuclear war would be so Pyrrhic that it could hardly be called one.

Just knowing their smouldering pile of rubble is better than the enemy's smouldering pile of rubble is good enough for some Tongue

if America was a pile of rubble covered in elephant diarhhea it would still be better than Russia is today.
Logged
Unapologetic Chinaperson
nj_dem
Jr. Member
***
Posts: leet


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #21 on: December 04, 2017, 08:34:50 PM »

Are people on this thread really advocating for nuclear war?
Logged
Absentee Voting Ghost of Ruin
Runeghost
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,654


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #22 on: December 04, 2017, 08:45:51 PM »

Are people on this thread really advocating for nuclear war?

I think, for them, nuclear is just the power, the devastation is very important to them.
Logged
Ye We Can
Mumph
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,465


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #23 on: December 04, 2017, 08:57:43 PM »

This world sucks I say go for it
Logged
HillGoose
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,973
United States


Political Matrix
E: 1.74, S: -8.96

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #24 on: December 04, 2017, 09:29:54 PM »

You know when fluoridation first began? 1946. How does that coincide with your post-war Commie conspiracy, huh? It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way a hard-core Commie works.

does liking floridiations water mean I'm a commie too? do i have 2 commit Sudoku?
Logged
Pages: [1] 2 3  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.051 seconds with 12 queries.