Biden/Obama 2020?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 11, 2024, 05:42:49 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2020 U.S. Presidential Election (Moderators: Likely Voter, YE)
  Biden/Obama 2020?
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: ??
#1
Good idea
 
#2
Bad idea
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 45

Author Topic: Biden/Obama 2020?  (Read 1810 times)
FDB
Guest
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: October 31, 2017, 07:00:38 PM »
« edited: November 03, 2017, 05:36:56 AM by First Degree Burns »

deleted
Logged
progressive85
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,357
United States
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: October 31, 2017, 07:06:03 PM »

Now that's a winning ticket.
Logged
Co-Chair Bagel23
Bagel23
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,369
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.48, S: -1.83

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: October 31, 2017, 07:10:59 PM »

Logged
Strudelcutie4427
Singletxguyforfun
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,375
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: October 31, 2017, 07:14:32 PM »

I personally don’t dislike Biden. But I’m still pissed at Moochelle for ruining school lunches in middle and high school
Logged
Starry Eyed Jagaloon
Blairite
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,835
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: October 31, 2017, 08:03:07 PM »

I personally don’t dislike Biden. But I’m still pissed at Moochelle for ruining school lunches in middle and high school
They were never any good, but at least they're marginally healthier. It's impossible to make a decent lunch at the amount of money they cost.
Logged
Alabama_Indy10
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,319
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: October 31, 2017, 08:04:23 PM »

I personally don’t dislike Biden. But I’m still pissed at Moochelle for ruining school lunches in middle and high school
They were never any good, but at least they're marginally healthier. It's impossible to make a decent lunch at the amount of money they cost.

Mine used to be pretty good. Not anymore
Logged
Holmes
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,761
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -5.74

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: October 31, 2017, 08:07:34 PM »

I personally don’t dislike Biden. But I’m still pissed at Moochelle for ruining school lunches in middle and high school

Are you 12? Does it matter?
Logged
NewYorkExpress
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 24,817
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: October 31, 2017, 08:20:17 PM »

First, Michelle isn't interested. Second, didn't we prove with Hillary that nominating former FLOTUS's to high office is a bad idea?

If we're going to put a woman on the ticket, I'd rather have Gillibrand, Warren or Klobuchar.
Logged
Rookie Yinzer
RFKFan68
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,188
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: October 31, 2017, 08:21:37 PM »

That would be an amazing ticket. The other side wouldn’t have a chance IMO. Michelle Obama is mesmerizing when she speaks and Biden is the perfect foil for Trump’s crazy.  
Logged
Rookie Yinzer
RFKFan68
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,188
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: October 31, 2017, 08:26:44 PM »

First, Michelle isn't interested. Second, didn't we prove with Hillary that nominating former FLOTUS's to high office is a bad idea?
Not really. The most damaging criticisms to Hillary’s character was her actions as Secretary of State.
Logged
NewYorkExpress
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 24,817
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: October 31, 2017, 08:32:03 PM »

First, Michelle isn't interested. Second, didn't we prove with Hillary that nominating former FLOTUS's to high office is a bad idea?
Not really. The most damaging criticisms to Hillary’s character was her actions as Secretary of State.
Were you not paying attention during the 1990's at all? At least half the controversies of the Clinton Administration were Hillary's fault (and the other half, like Monicagate, were just Bill being a horny freak).
Logged
Sirius_
Ninja0428
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,115
United States


Political Matrix
E: -2.00, S: -7.91


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: October 31, 2017, 08:36:32 PM »

Logged
Rookie Yinzer
RFKFan68
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,188
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: October 31, 2017, 08:47:31 PM »

First, Michelle isn't interested. Second, didn't we prove with Hillary that nominating former FLOTUS's to high office is a bad idea?
Not really. The most damaging criticisms to Hillary’s character was her actions as Secretary of State.
Were you not paying attention during the 1990's at all? At least half the controversies of the Clinton Administration were Hillary's fault (and the other half, like Monicagate, were just Bill being a horny freak).
The main attacks on Hillary in 2016 were actions from her time as Secretary of State. She didn't lose the election because of her baking cookies comment, her attempts at "Hillarycare", or because she took furniture on her way out of the White House.

And even if we do take in to account all of Hillary's controversies in the 90s, that has nothing to do with Michelle Obama. Hillary is not representative of all first ladies. Michelle never had any scandals, is not viewed as corrupt, and is popular among key groups that Hillary wasn't. It's comparing apples and oranges.
Logged
P. Clodius Pulcher did nothing wrong
razze
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,086
Cuba


Political Matrix
E: -6.52, S: -4.96


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: October 31, 2017, 09:31:51 PM »

Logged
cwt
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 362


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: October 31, 2017, 10:11:19 PM »

There isn't much enthusiasm for a de-facto third Obama term. That's part of the reason Hillary lost.
Logged
Strudelcutie4427
Singletxguyforfun
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,375
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: October 31, 2017, 10:18:48 PM »

I personally don’t dislike Biden. But I’m still pissed at Moochelle for ruining school lunches in middle and high school
They were never any good, but at least they're marginally healthier. It's impossible to make a decent lunch at the amount of money they cost.

I really didnt care if they were healthy or not. I played football hockey and baseball and it was pretty hard to stay focused and energized on such a low calorie intake. Pretty much all i got to eat was a chicken patty and they forced us to get vegetables with it, which I legitimately cant eat so I had alot of problems with being very hungry at school and at practice
Logged
Sestak
jk2020
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,284
Ukraine


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: November 01, 2017, 12:30:46 PM »

Logged
TDAS04
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,547
Bhutan


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: November 01, 2017, 01:00:55 PM »

Great idea.
Logged
mvd10
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,709


Political Matrix
E: 2.58, S: -2.61

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: November 01, 2017, 01:09:01 PM »

78-year-old extremely gaffe prone moderate white man in an increasingly left-wing party and a FLOTUS who has never held any office before. Nope.
Logged
Sherrod Brown Shill
NerdFighter40351
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 716
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -6.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #19 on: November 02, 2017, 06:24:43 AM »

I personally don’t dislike Biden. But I’m still pissed at Moochelle for ruining school lunches in middle and high school

Are you 12? Does it matter?

BUT SHE PUT VEJIE TABELS IN MY LUANCHES!
Logged
beaver2.0
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,775


Political Matrix
E: -2.45, S: -0.52

P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #20 on: November 02, 2017, 10:43:24 AM »

Biden = good idea.

Michelle Obama running without any prior elected office = bad idea.
Logged
Lord Admirale
Admiral President
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,879
United States Minor Outlying Islands


Political Matrix
E: -1.94, S: -0.70

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #21 on: November 02, 2017, 03:30:43 PM »

Biden = good idea.

Michelle Obama running without any prior elected office = bad idea.
That's why she should've either

A) Pulled a Hillary 2000 and run for Mark Kirk's seat in 2016
or
B) Run against Bruce Rauner for Governor
Logged
Lechasseur
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,793


Political Matrix
E: -0.52, S: 3.13

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #22 on: November 02, 2017, 07:37:40 PM »

First, Michelle isn't interested. Second, didn't we prove with Hillary that nominating former FLOTUS's to high office is a bad idea?
Not really. The most damaging criticisms to Hillary’s character was her actions as Secretary of State.
Were you not paying attention during the 1990's at all? At least half the controversies of the Clinton Administration were Hillary's fault (and the other half, like Monicagate, were just Bill being a horny freak).

This

First, Michelle isn't interested. Second, didn't we prove with Hillary that nominating former FLOTUS's to high office is a bad idea?
Not really. The most damaging criticisms to Hillary’s character was her actions as Secretary of State.
Were you not paying attention during the 1990's at all? At least half the controversies of the Clinton Administration were Hillary's fault (and the other half, like Monicagate, were just Bill being a horny freak).
The main attacks on Hillary in 2016 were actions from her time as Secretary of State. She didn't lose the election because of her baking cookies comment, her attempts at "Hillarycare", or because she took furniture on her way out of the White House.

And even if we do take in to account all of Hillary's controversies in the 90s, that has nothing to do with Michelle Obama. Hillary is not representative of all first ladies. Michelle never had any scandals, is not viewed as corrupt, and is popular among key groups that Hillary wasn't. It's comparing apples and oranges.

This is true

There isn't much enthusiasm for a de-facto third Obama term. That's part of the reason Hillary lost.

Agreed. I think one or the other on the ticket would be OK for Democrats but not both.
Logged
beaver2.0
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,775


Political Matrix
E: -2.45, S: -0.52

P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #23 on: November 02, 2017, 10:46:00 PM »

Biden = good idea.

Michelle Obama running without any prior elected office = bad idea.
That's why she should've either

A) Pulled a Hillary 2000 and run for Mark Kirk's seat in 2016
or
B) Run against Bruce Rauner for Governor
Yes.  Michelle Obama 2024 or 2028 isn't necessarily a terrible choice, but 2020 is too soon.
Logged
JonHawk
JHawk
Rookie
**
Posts: 213


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #24 on: November 03, 2017, 11:56:24 AM »

Lol there is no way in hell Michael is running. Age would be a factor for Biden.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.062 seconds with 14 queries.