2016: Ben Carson/Tim Scott vs Hillary Clinton/Cory Booker
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 29, 2024, 01:33:23 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Election What-ifs?
  Past Election What-ifs (US) (Moderator: Dereich)
  2016: Ben Carson/Tim Scott vs Hillary Clinton/Cory Booker
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: 2016: Ben Carson/Tim Scott vs Hillary Clinton/Cory Booker  (Read 442 times)
NewYorkExpress
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 24,817
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: October 28, 2017, 01:52:50 PM »

Donald Trump does not run for the Republican nomination, and Ben Carson is able to harness the anti-establishment energy to win the nomination. He selects Tim Scott as his running mate.

Hillary Clinton survives a contentious primary, and fearful of losing Black voters to the Scott/Carson ticket, selects Cory Booker as her running mate.

Who wins, why, and does any Independent or minor party have a significant result (Sanders, Johnson, Stein)?
Logged
The Undefeatable Debbie Stabenow
slightlyburnttoast
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,049
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.42, S: -5.43

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: October 28, 2017, 07:53:32 PM »

Carson was one of the weakest potential GOP candidates, honestly maybe the weakest. He doesn't have the appeal to WWC voters that Trump did and, although he's a minority, he probably only performs a couple points better than Trump among blacks if even better at all. I think Carson would actually hold up decently in the South, so he manages to keep NC, but he collapses in the Midwest, barring his home state of Michigan, where he keeps it pretty competitive.



Fmr. Sos/Sen./FLOTUS Hillary Clinton (D-NY) / Sen. Cory Booker (D-NJ)
Dr. Ben Carson (R-MI) / Sen. Tim Scott (R-SC)

Logged
RC (a la Frémont)
ReaganClinton20XX
Atlas Politician
Sr. Member
*****
Posts: 2,274
United States


Political Matrix
E: -2.19, S: -6.96

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: November 01, 2017, 10:18:51 PM »
« Edited: November 01, 2017, 10:22:28 PM by Assemblyman ReaganClinton »



Carson is an insanely weak candidate to be nominated, as such, he loses key states. McMullin wins Utah very narrowly (within 5%), and Hillary flips Arizona, Montana, and Indiana. Booker helps keep key states like New Hampshire, Pennsylvania, and Maine in the Clinton column, but they aren't much of a concern anyways, as Carson wouldn't really do much against her in those states. The saving grace of the GOP tickit is Tim Scott, who allows the party to hold on to North Carolina and Georgia, both narrowly.
Logged
Lechasseur
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,767


Political Matrix
E: -0.52, S: 3.13

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: November 02, 2017, 09:23:02 AM »



Carson is an insanely weak candidate to be nominated, as such, he loses key states. McMullin wins Utah very narrowly (within 5%), and Hillary flips Arizona, Montana, and Indiana. Booker helps keep key states like New Hampshire, Pennsylvania, and Maine in the Clinton column, but they aren't much of a concern anyways, as Carson wouldn't really do much against her in those states. The saving grace of the GOP tickit is Tim Scott, who allows the party to hold on to North Carolina and Georgia, both narrowly.

Probably something like this
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.023 seconds with 12 queries.