CO-SEN 2020: Two Democrats already in
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 30, 2024, 11:06:46 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  CO-SEN 2020: Two Democrats already in
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Will Gardner be Blanched?
#1
Yes
 
#2
Narrowly loses
 
#3
Narrowly wins
 
#4
Doesn't run again
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 54

Author Topic: CO-SEN 2020: Two Democrats already in  (Read 1758 times)
I’m not Stu
ERM64man
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,794


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: September 05, 2017, 09:01:44 PM »

Derrick Blanton and Justin Leitzel are in. A serious Democrat will likely file in 2019. What's Gardner's fate?
Logged
Holmes
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,756
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -5.74

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: September 05, 2017, 09:27:37 PM »

Probably loses, especially if Nevada and Arizona go the way we all think they will next year.
Logged
BlueDogDemocrat
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 289
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: September 05, 2017, 09:30:33 PM »

Hes probably going to lose by around 5% but if Hickenlooper runs he shouldn't even waste his time campaigning.
Logged
Attorney General, Senator-Elect, & Former PPT Dwarven Dragon
Dwarven Dragon
Atlas Politician
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,723
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.42, S: -0.52

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: September 05, 2017, 09:32:15 PM »

Likely D with Hickenlooper, Lean D otherwise.
Logged
Figueira
84285
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,173


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: September 05, 2017, 10:41:17 PM »

Somewhere between "narrowly loses" and "blanched." Colorado is probably too polarized for him to lose by a huge margin, but he won't get any crossover votes to speak of.
Logged
Heisenberg
SecureAmerica
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,112
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: September 05, 2017, 10:47:07 PM »

I think he loses by 6-7% or so. Too much of a loss to be narrow, too close to call it a Blanching.
Logged
Meatball Ron
recoveringdemocrat
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,284


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: September 05, 2017, 11:45:23 PM »

I think he loses by 6-7% or so. Too much of a loss to be narrow, too close to call it a Blanching.

Agreed
Logged
kyc0705
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,757


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: September 06, 2017, 06:45:53 PM »

Derrick Blanton and Justin Leitzel are in. A serious Democrat will likely file in 2019. What's Gardner's fate?

You know you're losing it when you see "2019" and have to take a minute to figure out when that is.
Logged
Keep cool-idge
Benjamin Harrison he is w
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,770
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: September 06, 2017, 09:01:40 PM »

We should know by now not call someone dead on arrival or no chance they lose
Here are some for all of you
Mark udall
Mark warner
Ron Johnson
Roy blunt
Richard burr
Scott brown 2010
Harry Truman 1948
Hillary Clinton 2016
Jon tester
Clarie mccaskill
Matt Bevin
Pat tommey
And of course Donald trump
Logged
I’m not Stu
ERM64man
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,794


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: September 06, 2017, 09:06:50 PM »

We should know by now not call someone dead on arrival or no chance they lose
Here are some for all of you
Mark udall
Mark warner
Ron Johnson
Roy blunt
Richard burr
Scott brown 2010
Harry Truman 1948
Hillary Clinton 2016
Jon tester
Clarie mccaskill
Matt Bevin
Pat tommey
And of course Donald trump

Burr was favored. Tester is favored but could lose. McCaskill could win. Toomey and Johnson were helped by a more favorable year for the GOP in swing states. Blunt nearly lost despite having the advantage of incumbency in a red state.
Logged
Keep cool-idge
Benjamin Harrison he is w
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,770
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: September 06, 2017, 10:09:50 PM »

We should know by now not call someone dead on arrival or no chance they lose
Here are some for all of you
Mark udall
Mark warner
Ron Johnson
Roy blunt
Richard burr
Scott brown 2010
Harry Truman 1948
Hillary Clinton 2016
Jon tester
Clarie mccaskill
Matt Bevin
Pat tommey
And of course Donald trump

Burr was favored. Tester is favored but could lose. McCaskill could win. Toomey and Johnson were helped by a more favorable year for the GOP in swing states. Blunt nearly lost despite having the advantage of incumbency in a red state.
That's my point a lot of those people were meant to win easily or lose yet they either won or almost lost on Election Day.
Logged
KingSweden
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,227
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: September 06, 2017, 10:58:44 PM »

I think he loses by 6-7% or so. Too much of a loss to be narrow, too close to call it a Blanching.

Agreed
Logged
MAINEiac4434
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,269
France


Political Matrix
E: -7.42, S: -8.78

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: September 07, 2017, 02:02:17 AM »

This state is trending more Democratic by the hour. If someone credible runs against Gardner (they will), he's toast.
Logged
TheSaint250
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,072


Political Matrix
E: -2.84, S: 5.22

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: September 07, 2017, 08:58:06 AM »

I doubt Gardner is DOA. His Morning Consult approval rating is 51%, which is higher than Bennet's. If he loses, it will most likely be because the GOP nominee drags the ticket down (but Gardner will most likely run ahead of the nominee)
Logged
Mr. Smith
MormDem
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 33,214
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: September 07, 2017, 10:09:07 AM »

Did Mark Udall decline for rematch yet?
Logged
Cynthia
ueutyi
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 466
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -4.00, S: -3.63

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: September 07, 2017, 01:28:06 PM »

He'll lose by the 6-7 in my opinion.
Logged
Cactus Jack
azcactus
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,956
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: September 07, 2017, 05:42:54 PM »

Colorado hasn't swung left enough for Gardner to be Blanched or Kirked, but I wager he's still in for a fairly wide loss.
Logged
libertpaulian
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,611
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: September 07, 2017, 06:19:45 PM »

If 2020 is a 2008-esque blue tsunami, he's gone.  If it's a neutral year, it could go either way.  If Trump wins by his 2016 margins or expands on them, he wins.
Logged
The Undefeatable Debbie Stabenow
slightlyburnttoast
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,049
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.42, S: -5.43

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: September 09, 2017, 08:26:41 PM »

Likely D with Hickenlooper, Lean D otherwise.
Logged
MT Treasurer
IndyRep
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,276
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #19 on: September 14, 2017, 11:17:05 AM »

If 2020 is a 2008-esque blue tsunami, he's gone.  If it's a neutral year, it could go either way.  If Trump wins by his 2016 margins or expands on them, he wins.

Not really, no. Trump lost Colorado by a lot even as he won 304 electoral votes nationally. There is basically zero split-ticket voting happening in blue states anymore, and Trump has little chance of winning CO in 2020.

I'd say Gardner has the same "chance" of winning reelection as McCaskill does, honestly. Likely D, could be anything from a 2-point to a 9-point loss.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.054 seconds with 13 queries.