who would weld have a better chance against?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 26, 2024, 12:23:03 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Gubernatorial/State Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  who would weld have a better chance against?		 « previous next »
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: ....
#1
elliot spitzer		  
#2
hillary clinton		  
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results
Total Voters: 28

Author Topic: who would weld have a better chance against?  (Read 1610 times)
WalterMitty
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,572


Political Matrix
E: 1.68, S: -2.26

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: August 21, 2005, 05:21:56 PM »
discuss
Logged
© tweed
Miamiu1027
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,562
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: August 21, 2005, 06:40:19 PM »
I'd say Spitzer...I assume you mean assuming both races would be for different offices.  If he ran against Hillary this year for senate he'd lose by 25%, as opposed to about a 15-20% loss against Spitzer for Gov. 
Logged
I spent the winter writing songs about getting better
BRTD
Atlas Prophet
*****
Posts: 113,037
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -6.50, S: -6.67

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: August 21, 2005, 06:51:53 PM »
Hillary. But in both cases his chances are somewhere between slim and none, heavily leaning toward none.
Logged
YRABNNRM
YoungRepub
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,680
United States
Political Matrix
E: 0.90, S: -6.09

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: August 21, 2005, 06:55:27 PM »
Spitzer. Hillary is too high to fall now.
Logged
Virginian87
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,598
Political Matrix
E: -3.55, S: 2.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: August 22, 2005, 10:16:07 AM »
I'd like to say Hillary, simply because I want to derail her presidential ambitions.  I actually think, though, that Weld would have a better chance against Hillary than Spitzer, who is like the white version of Barack Obama.
Logged
Speed of Sound
LiberalPA
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,166
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: August 22, 2005, 10:57:19 AM »
Quote from: Virginian87 on August 22, 2005, 10:16:07 AM
I'd like to say Hillary, simply because I want to derail her presidential ambitions.  I actually think, though, that Weld would have a better chance against Hillary than Spitzer, who is like the white version of Barack Obama.
except for the one major difference between them: Hillary sucks compared to barack obama.
Logged
Ben.
Ben
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,249


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: August 24, 2005, 09:49:22 AM »
Quote from: Virginian87 on August 22, 2005, 10:16:07 AM

I'd like to say Hillary, simply because I want to derail her presidential ambitions.  I actually think, though, that Weld would have a better chance against Hillary than Spitzer, who is like the white version of Barack Obama.


I agree, but how is Hillary like the white house version of Barack Obama.

Obama is likeable and has a future, Hillary is neither likeable and where she the nominee would be selling the Democratic Party's future down the rive!
Logged
TheresNoMoney
Scoonie
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,907


Political Matrix
E: -3.25, S: -2.72

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: August 24, 2005, 10:24:01 AM »
Hillary.
Logged
True Democrat
true democrat
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,368
United States


Political Matrix
E: 1.10, S: -2.87

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: August 24, 2005, 07:00:03 PM »
Spitzter obviously.  Only for the reason that I would support Weld over Spitzer, but not over Hillary, and my opinion as an underage out of state matters the most.  Smiley
Logged
Defarge
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,588


Political Matrix
E: -3.13, S: -0.72

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: August 24, 2005, 07:41:56 PM »
Spitzer.  Clint is a popular incumbent cannot fall.  Spitzer on the other hand will face tougher competition from NY's interests.
Logged
AuH2O
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,239


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: August 25, 2005, 03:32:13 PM »
Spitzer is not quite the juggernaut he's made out to be. Close to unbeatable, sure, it's NY and he's a popular AG, but as a candidate he really isn't that stellar. Kind of a slimy guy.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.039 seconds with 13 queries.