NY Senate 2000 : Hillary Clinton vs Rudy Giuliani
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 30, 2024, 06:54:23 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  NY Senate 2000 : Hillary Clinton vs Rudy Giuliani		 « previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: NY Senate 2000 : Hillary Clinton vs Rudy Giuliani  (Read 972 times)
UWS
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,241


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: July 31, 2017, 06:55:36 AM »
In 2000, Rudy Giuliani, popular Mayor of New York City, was for a while the favorite for the Republican nomination for New York Senator in 2000 before withdrawing from the race and being replaced by Rick Lazio. Had he still been in the race, he would have faced First Lady Hillary Clinton.

Had Giuliani not dropped out of the race, would he have defeated Hillary Clinton at a time her husband's job approval was above 55 %?
Logged
The Govanah Jake
Jake Jewvinivisk
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,234


Political Matrix
E: -2.39, S: -5.30

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: July 31, 2017, 10:38:47 AM »
He was behind Clinton 8-10 points by the time he dropped out. If he stayed in, he could of overcome the gap but I suspect in the end Clinton is able to edge anywhere between 1-10% points. It would still be closer then with Lazio because Giuliani was a strsinger canidate.
Logged
Attorney General, Senator-Elect, & Former PPT Dwarven Dragon
Dwarven Dragon
Atlas Politician
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,720
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.42, S: -0.52

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: July 31, 2017, 10:50:31 AM »
At the very least, he would have held Clinton to 50 to 48 ish win, which is extremely embarrassing for a Democrat in New York.
Logged
maga2020
Rookie
**
Posts: 131


Political Matrix
E: 5.48, S: 7.74

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: July 31, 2017, 11:12:44 AM »
Rudy would win, Hllary underperformed on both bids for Senate.

He would reduce her margins a lot in NYC, perform well in upstate and both Long Island and Staten Island would come full force to support the greatest mayor in NYC history.
Logged
Mr.Phips
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,546


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: July 31, 2017, 11:45:32 AM »
Quote from: Dwarven Dragon on July 31, 2017, 10:50:31 AM
At the very least, he would have held Clinton to 50 to 48 ish win, which is extremely embarrassing for a Democrat in New York.

Based on the polls, most observers were expecting Hillary to win a narrow victory (like 50-48) over Lazio.  Her winning 55-43 was a shocker.  The NRSC wasted a ton of money on this race thinking Hillary could be beaten.
Logged
Attorney General, Senator-Elect, & Former PPT Dwarven Dragon
Dwarven Dragon
Atlas Politician
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,720
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.42, S: -0.52

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: July 31, 2017, 12:45:19 PM »
Quote from: Mr.Phips on July 31, 2017, 11:45:32 AM
Quote from: Dwarven Dragon on July 31, 2017, 10:50:31 AM
At the very least, he would have held Clinton to 50 to 48 ish win, which is extremely embarrassing for a Democrat in New York.

Based on the polls, most observers were expecting Hillary to win a narrow victory (like 50-48) over Lazio.  Her winning 55-43 was a shocker.  The NRSC wasted a ton of money on this race thinking Hillary could be beaten.

The poll taken closest to the election said Clinton +12.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.028 seconds with 11 queries.