Lyndon Johnson vs. Herbert Hoover, 1964
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 26, 2024, 05:37:15 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Election What-ifs?
  Alternative Elections (Moderator: Dereich)
  Lyndon Johnson vs. Herbert Hoover, 1964
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Who would you vote for?
#1
Johnson
 
#2
Hoover
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 29

Author Topic: Lyndon Johnson vs. Herbert Hoover, 1964  (Read 8233 times)
A18
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,794
Political Matrix
E: 9.23, S: -6.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: August 11, 2005, 12:26:41 AM »

I of course vote for the less socialist candidate. Option 1. Let's assume he lives a month longer.

Maps?
Logged
Ebowed
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,597


Political Matrix
E: 4.13, S: 2.09

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: August 11, 2005, 01:07:20 AM »

ABA's map looks about right.  But the South would basically depend on Hoover's stance on civil rights.
Logged
PBrunsel
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,537


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: August 11, 2005, 01:06:28 PM »

Hoover landslide of course. Smiley
Logged
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,734


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: August 11, 2005, 01:13:24 PM »

I of course vote for the less socialist candidate.


HAHA
Logged
PBrunsel
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,537


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: August 11, 2005, 01:14:56 PM »


I of course was joking. Hoover was 90 years old, and in horrible health. The GOP would not have nominated him anyway, but he would not have won. He would have done better than Goldwater, but then again, most Republicans would have.
Logged
Max Power
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,182
Political Matrix
E: 1.84, S: -8.09

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: August 11, 2005, 01:20:54 PM »

Just curious, did Hoover support civil rights?
Logged
A18
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,794
Political Matrix
E: 9.23, S: -6.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: August 11, 2005, 01:22:47 PM »

No. So he probably would have strongly supported the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
Logged
PBrunsel
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,537


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: August 11, 2005, 01:24:05 PM »


By what I could gather he was a supporter of minority voting rights. He supported civil rights, and Ike went to him durring the Little Rock Crisis in '57 to get advice on what t do about Governopr Faubus's opposition to brown v. Board of Education.

I do know that he was an advocate f civil rights. If he felt it was a state or federal issue, I am unaware though.
Logged
skybridge
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,919
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: August 11, 2005, 01:47:13 PM »

As long as JFK dies, the only one who could beat Johnson is RFK.
Logged
PBrunsel
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,537


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: August 11, 2005, 04:31:55 PM »



Lyndon Johnson/Hubert Humphrey (D): 283 electoral votes

Herbert Hoover/David Eisenhower (R): 220 Electoral Votes

States Right's Electors: 35 Electoral Votes

Yes, kind of kind to my hero, but Hoover was far more well liked than Barry Goldwater and generally well loved in 1964 as the truth behind his greatness came out.
Logged
© tweed
Miamiu1027
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,562
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: August 11, 2005, 06:24:11 PM »

ick...both are disasters, just in different ways.  Johnson's domestic policy was decent, which matters the most in terms of quality of life on the home front.
Logged
CPT MikeyMike
mikeymike
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,513
United States


Political Matrix
E: 6.58, S: -3.30

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: August 12, 2005, 06:55:03 PM »



Lyndon Johnson/Hubert Humphrey (D): 283 electoral votes

Herbert Hoover/David Eisenhower (R): 220 Electoral Votes

States Right's Electors: 35 Electoral Votes

Yes, kind of kind to my hero, but Hoover was far more well liked than Barry Goldwater and generally well loved in 1964 as the truth behind his greatness came out.

I would agree with the map only if Hoover was 25 years younger in 1964. Plus North Dakota, Vermont and Oklahoma would go to Hoover.
Logged
MaC
Milk_and_cereal
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,787


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: August 12, 2005, 09:44:34 PM »

I of course vote for the less socialist candidate. Option 1. Let's assume he lives a month longer.

Maps?

typical Phillip, makes an outrageous assertion without backing it up and expects us to completely understand what he's talking about.

Hoover may have started the New Deal, but he didn't do nearly as much as Lyndon Johnson did in as far as starting social programs or setting minimum wage laws, or starting work programs, or creating a welfare state.  Care to back up your assertion?
Logged
A18
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,794
Political Matrix
E: 9.23, S: -6.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: August 12, 2005, 10:03:53 PM »

Hoover raised the top income tax rate from 25% to 63%. With his approval, the estate tax was doubled and corporate taxes were raised by almost 15%.

Notable Hoover policies and proposals include fifty dollar monthly pensions for Americans over 65. A price-fixing Federal Farm Board. An anti-trust division in the Justice Department. Federal loans for urban slum clearances. A federal Department of Education. And the Anti-Injunction Act, which outlawed yellow dog contracts in which a worker agreed as a condition of employment not to join a labor union.

Some of those became law. Others didn't. They were all bad.
Logged
MaC
Milk_and_cereal
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,787


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: August 12, 2005, 10:10:57 PM »

Hoover raised the top income tax rate from 25% to 63%. With his approval, the estate tax was doubled and corporate taxes were raised by almost 15%.

Notable Hoover policies and proposals include fifty dollar monthly pensions for Americans over 65. A price-fixing Federal Farm Board. An anti-trust division in the Justice Department. Federal loans for urban slum clearances. A federal Department of Education. And the Anti-Injunction Act, which outlawed yellow dog contracts in which a worker agreed as a condition of employment not to join a labor union.

Some of those became law. Others didn't. They were all bad.

ah, okay.  You make good points.  Not enough to convince me, but still good, although I wish you'd start a thread with these claims rather than have us in the dark.
Logged
PBrunsel
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,537


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: August 13, 2005, 07:36:32 PM »

Hoover raised the top income tax rate from 25% to 63%. With his approval, the estate tax was doubled and corporate taxes were raised by almost 15%.

Notable Hoover policies and proposals include fifty dollar monthly pensions for Americans over 65. A price-fixing Federal Farm Board. An anti-trust division in the Justice Department. Federal loans for urban slum clearances. A federal Department of Education. And the Anti-Injunction Act, which outlawed yellow dog contracts in which a worker agreed as a condition of employment not to join a labor union.

Some of those became law. Others didn't. They were all bad.

You amke good points Phillip, but we must remember that the economic ideas that Hoover and Mellon followed were of the School of Adam Smith Economics where you focus on balanced budgets, and you raise taxes in a time of economic downturn to meet the lost revenue so one may balalnce the budget. If raising taxes is a consequence of reaching the balanced budget, then so be it. That is what was beleived by a majority of not just politicians, but citizens.

It sounds silly now, but that was the way it worked back then. Balance the budget. FDR maqueraded as a balanced budget advocate in 1932, but also as a "New Dealer." And you thought John Kerry was a flip-flopper. FDR promised less spending, and more spending, in the same damn campaign!

Hoover other "Socialist" ideas were simply Depression measure, and only it the fan under FDR.
Logged
Tory
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,297


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: November 02, 2005, 08:57:46 PM »

Hoover
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.049 seconds with 16 queries.