SC-05: DCCC investing $275K for Parnell
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 29, 2024, 05:04:34 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  SC-05: DCCC investing $275K for Parnell
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: SC-05: DCCC investing $275K for Parnell  (Read 842 times)
GeorgiaModerate
Moderator
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,703


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: June 05, 2017, 06:31:19 PM »

http://www.postandcourier.com/news/national-democrats-making-modest-investment-in-south-carolina-race-to/article_69adf2f6-4a2b-11e7-8289-c776fc08cfce.html
Logged
wjx987
Rookie
**
Posts: 145
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: June 05, 2017, 08:25:06 PM »

He's had some pretty noticeable (albeit kinda silly) ads lately and the few polls released do show his numbers rising.
Logged
Tintrlvr
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,312


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: June 05, 2017, 08:27:53 PM »

For what it's worth (not much), Parnell would win the race if it had the same swing that happened in KS-04.
Logged
Pericles
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,110


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: June 05, 2017, 08:46:34 PM »

That's good Democrats need to compete even in races said to be 'unwinnable', Democrats should take every opportunity for a win.
Logged
Del Tachi
Republican95
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,842
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.52, S: 1.46

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: June 05, 2017, 08:54:45 PM »

That's good Democrats need to compete even in races said to be 'unwinnable', Democrats should take every opportunity for a win.

Limited resources.  Unlimited want.

Economics.
Logged
Skill and Chance
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,652
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: June 05, 2017, 08:59:23 PM »

That's good Democrats need to compete even in races said to be 'unwinnable', Democrats should take every opportunity for a win.

Limited resources.  Unlimited want.

Economics.

Well, there's a finite number of House districts and it's clear than an excess of donor funds have been going to the presidential race over and above what actually moves votes.  Kerry, Romney and Hillary Clinton all outraised their opponents.  Maybe a more efficient use of donor funds is to contest every district in the land downballot?  Or at least every US House and state legislative district where Trump/Clinton got less than 60% last year?
Logged
Badger
badger
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 40,317
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: June 05, 2017, 11:04:23 PM »

For what it's worth (not much), Parnell would win the race if it had the same swing that happened in KS-04.

Not to pile on in light of your caveat, but SC is for obvious reasons (cough! race! cough!) considerably less elastic than most non-southern states.
Logged
Badger
badger
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 40,317
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: June 06, 2017, 01:18:20 AM »

I think the DCCC screw the pooch in Kansas, and not entirely no hindsight is 20-20 type of way. Considering the margin of victory in Montana even after the assault comma I guess they were right to not invest their resources there.

So while I am not about to vouch for the DCCC strategic sense, there's got to be something Brewing if they're dropping over a quarter million on this race
Logged
jamestroll
jamespol
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,518


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: June 06, 2017, 01:38:01 AM »

KS-04 results did not surprise me at all.

Midwestern districts are extremely elastic. The route to Speaker Pelosi will likely come from the Midwest and sun belt districts with favorable demographics such as GA-06.
Logged
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,745


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: June 06, 2017, 01:38:08 AM »

Of course the Goldman Sachs lackey gets funded instead of progressives.
Logged
Chief Justice Keef
etr906
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,100
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: June 06, 2017, 08:50:46 AM »

Of course the Goldman Sachs lackey gets funded instead of progressives.

To play devil's advocate, the DCCC gave similar amounts of money to Quist, so this is probably more of a pity investment than Montana.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.035 seconds with 11 queries.