Who should Dems run in Montana in 2018 & can they win?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 29, 2024, 02:37:24 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  Who should Dems run in Montana in 2018 & can they win?
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Who should Dems run in Montana in 2018?
#1
Denise Juneau, former Superintendent of Public Instruction & 2016 candidate
 
#2
Amanda Curtis, State Rep. & '14 Senate nominee
 
#3
Kelly McCarthy, State Rep.
 
#4
Rob Quist, 2017 special election nominee
 
#5
Other
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 42

Author Topic: Who should Dems run in Montana in 2018 & can they win?  (Read 2100 times)
socaldem
skolodji
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,040


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: May 26, 2017, 02:01:13 AM »

My moderate Republican cousin who lives in Helena Montana predicted that Quist didn't have what it takes to win the special election. Which of the above candidates can give it a better shot in 2018?

I think either Amanda Curtis or Kelly McCarthy would have done better than Quist. The key was to overperform in the large counties and gin up Native American turnout in the rurals. Curtis and McCarthy both have links to Billings, which is critical for a win.

Logged
MT Treasurer
IndyRep
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,276
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: May 26, 2017, 10:54:23 AM »

1. Jesse Laslovich 
2. Casey Schreiner
3. Amanda Curtis


4. Kelly McCarthy

I think Laslovich could win if Gianforte has terrible approval ratings or implodes and 2018 is a massive Democratic wave. Either way, the race starts out as Lean R, and much closer to Likely R than Tossup.
Logged
Hindsight was 2020
Hindsight is 2020
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,418
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: May 26, 2017, 11:53:05 AM »

Why not Brian Schweitzer
Logged
Chief Justice Keef
etr906
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,100
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: May 26, 2017, 11:59:25 AM »

Amanda Curtis.
Logged
An American Tail: Fubart Goes West
Fubart Solman
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,734
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: May 26, 2017, 01:03:34 PM »

Logged
Figueira
84285
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,173


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: May 26, 2017, 02:39:29 PM »


He would be great, but there's no way he's running.
Logged
Figueira
84285
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,173


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: May 26, 2017, 02:41:54 PM »

1. Jesse Laslovich 
2. Casey Schreiner
3. Amanda Curtis


4. Kelly McCarthy

I think Laslovich could win if Gianforte has terrible approval ratings or implodes and 2018 is a massive Democratic wave. Either way, the race starts out as Lean R, and much closer to Likely R than Tossup.

Why would Jesse Laslovich be a good candidate, and why would Kelly McCarthy be bad?
Logged
MT Treasurer
IndyRep
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,276
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: May 26, 2017, 09:22:08 PM »

Why would Jesse Laslovich be a good candidate, and why would Kelly McCarthy be bad?

Laslovich has the right profile and background (his service as chief legal counsel and also in the MT legislature, where he was pretty popular) and comes across as likeable and down-to-earth. While it's true that he lost the race for Auditor to Rosendale by 8 points (and let's not forget that it was a GOP wave year), it was also an open seat and he did better than any other Democratic candidate on the ballot except Bullock of course. Yes, Melissa Romano also did better, but she was running against an incredibly weak candidate - plus, Democrats have always done well in Superintendent of Public Instruction races. I believe Arntzen is the first GOP superintendent in three decades or so.

Curtis is one of the better and more authentic MT Democrats IMO, but I don't see her winning unless Gianforte has really awful approval ratings (which is certainly possible). She would energize the base for sure, but do you see a path for her to win? Then again, like I said, if Gianforte implodes and 2018 is a Democratic wave, maybe.

I'm really not sure why McCarthy is supposed to be such a good candidate. Do people just mention him because he sought the Democratic nomination in 2017 and his district is located in Yellowstone County (keep in mind that Clinton won his district in 2016)? He strikes me as someone who could be painted as a "career politician" very easily and who would crack under pressure, but of course I could be wrong.
Logged
Coolface Sock #42069
whitesox130
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,694
United States


Political Matrix
E: 4.39, S: 2.26

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: May 26, 2017, 10:53:40 PM »

Rob Quist again. Midterm should have higher turnout than this special.
Logged
MT Treasurer
IndyRep
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,276
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: May 26, 2017, 11:09:53 PM »

Rob Quist again. Midterm should have higher turnout than this special.

Rob Quist didn't lose because of low turnout. Plus, I'm not sure why everyone thinks higher turnout always benefits Democrats.
Logged
Jeppe
Bosse
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,805
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -4.13, S: -4.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: May 27, 2017, 07:36:57 AM »

Amanda Curtis, definitely.
Logged
Coolface Sock #42069
whitesox130
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,694
United States


Political Matrix
E: 4.39, S: 2.26

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: May 27, 2017, 10:40:45 AM »

Rob Quist again. Midterm should have higher turnout than this special.

Rob Quist didn't lose because of low turnout. Plus, I'm not sure why everyone thinks higher turnout always benefits Democrats.
I'm not saying it does, but I think there's a good chance it could.
Logged
This account no longer in use.
cxs018
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,282


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: May 27, 2017, 11:14:25 AM »

Just speaking hypothetically, but couldn't Max Baucus run? If not, Schweitzer would probably be the best choice, followed by Curtis, followed by Quist.
Logged
Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers
olawakandi
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 88,712
Jamaica
Political Matrix
E: -6.84, S: -0.17


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: May 27, 2017, 11:26:30 AM »

Whoever, they nominate Dems will be helped, by Jon Tester, unlike the Special election.
Logged
Kingpoleon
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,144
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: May 27, 2017, 11:33:30 AM »

Brian Schweitzer, Zeno Baucus, or Linda McCulloch would all make good candidates.
Logged
MT Treasurer
IndyRep
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,276
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: May 27, 2017, 01:11:08 PM »

I'm not saying it does, but I think there's a good chance it could.

It depends, but Montana is not the kind of state where "low turnout" hurts Democrats, especially in a special election. Also, turnout in this special election was higher than in 2014.

Quist lost a winnable race by six points, his only hope in 2018 would be a massive Democratic wave and/or Gianforte having awful approval ratings. The MT Democratic Party has better options.

Whoever, they nominate Dems will be helped, by Jon Tester, unlike the Special election.

No, not really. Jon Tester didn't help Kim Gillan in 2012 either, and anyone who thinks his margin of victory will be so big that he will have "coattails" is probably deluded, tbh.

Brian Schweitzer, Zeno Baucus, or Linda McCulloch would all make good candidates.

Schweitzer isn't going to run and Zeno Baucus would get absolutely crushed. I'm not sure why you think he would make a good candidate, unless you just randomly googled "Montana Democrat" and thought he would be strong because of his last name. I don't see Linda McMulloch running (she didn't even run for this year's special election), and she would have a hard time winning a Congressional race. McMulloch released the voting records of the candidates running in the Secretary of state race last year and basically used her office to campaign for Lindeen. She's much more partisan than many people would assume.

Just speaking hypothetically, but couldn't Max Baucus run? If not, Schweitzer would probably be the best choice, followed by Curtis, followed by Quist.

Max Baucus isn't really popular in Montana, though. Running him would basically be an IN-SEN 2016 redux, except Baucus wouldn't be up 20-30 points in initial polling, but probably tied with GF at best. He retired from the Senate in 2014, and there is no reason why he would want to run for a House seat in 2018. And tbh, if I were a Democrat, I'd rather want to see a "fresh face" running than someone like Baucus.
Logged
Terry the Fat Shark
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,502
United States


P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: May 27, 2017, 09:11:16 PM »

Why is everyone so high on Curtis?
Logged
Kamala
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,499
Madagascar


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: May 27, 2017, 10:26:26 PM »


She's very authentic. A kind of person whom you'd want to have in Congress.
Logged
Shameless Lefty Hack
Chickenhawk
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,178


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: May 27, 2017, 10:36:22 PM »

What's the reason for Schweitzer's apparent retirement from politics? Just too happy at his mining company job? Not suggesting he should run for Rep, but I'd love for him to go after Daines in 2020.
Logged
KingSweden
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,227
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #19 on: May 27, 2017, 11:53:40 PM »

Whatever happened to Kendall Van Dyk? Is he still around? Or Bryce Bennett (who has LGBT cred)?
Logged
Co-Chair Bagel23
Bagel23
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,369
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.48, S: -1.83

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #20 on: May 28, 2017, 03:18:13 PM »

Max Baucus lol.
Logged
BuckeyeNut
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,458


Political Matrix
E: -8.65, S: -7.30

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #21 on: May 29, 2017, 05:40:57 PM »

The NASA kid who gave it a go-round should run again.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.051 seconds with 13 queries.