Is Ann Coulter hot?

[Swing low, sweet chariot. Comin' for to carry me home.]

no

[Jake]

Your writing skills are suffering JFraud. Get the out of my country isn't a sentence.

Are you too stupid to realize that a word was censored, like maybe the word fuck?

Or maybe fuck?

[RBH]

Michelle Malkin blows Coulter out of the water

[I spent the winter writing songs about getting better]

Michelle Malkin blows Coulter out of the water

true, but there are still far hotter Filipina women than her.

[Speed of Sound]

Your writing skills are suffering JFraud. Get the out of my country isn't a sentence.

Are you too stupid to realize that a word was censored, like maybe the word fuck?

Or maybe fuck?

maybe.

[TeePee4Prez]

Nice legs, thought she was at first, but now that I looked at her up close, no.

[DanielX]

No, but that does not diminish the truth and insight of her writings.

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

So you and Hitchabrut support terrorism against the New York Times?

Hunh?

You also support invading every Muslim-majority nation and converting the residents to Christianity? How sad.

Actually, I favor Judaism . So I guess Ann Coulter and I don't agree on everything .

[Democratic Hawk]

No - and the 3 who reckon she is need to go and get their heads read, unless they are joking . She's not pretty and she's even uglier on the inside

Dave

[MonkeyPooo4U]

I'd have to say she's attractive, but not exactly "hot".

That being said, even as a conservative I don't like her.  She's too extreme and too bitter.

[Richard]

Hmm, is two eggs nailed to a cardboard plant "hot?

[dazzleman]

No, but that does not diminish the truth and insight of her writings.

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

So you and Hitchabrut support terrorism against the New York Times?

What are you talking about?  In any case, the NY Times deserves whatever it gets.

[Cashcow]

No, but that does not diminish the truth and insight of her writings.

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

So you and Hitchabrut support terrorism against the New York Times?

What are you talking about?  In any case, the NY Times deserves whatever it gets.

Thanks for the input, Professor Churchill.

[dazzleman]

Thanks for the input, Professor Churchill.

I really don't know what terrorism against the NY Times BRTD is talking about.  I am not a fan of the NY Times, so you won't find me defending it in any case, but I have no idea what Ann Coulter is supposed to have done to that so-called newspaper.

I don't think Ann Coulter is particularly attractive, but I do think she's very funny.  Humor is often based on exaggeration, and Ann Coulter does this very well.  There is enough truth in what she says that it strikes a chord, but she often overstates her case pretty strongly.

[I spent the winter writing songs about getting better]

Thanks for the input, Professor Churchill.

I really don't know what terrorism against the NY Times BRTD is talking about.  I am not a fan of the NY Times, so you won't find me defending it in any case, but I have no idea what Ann Coulter is supposed to have done to that so-called newspaper.

She said "My only problem with Timothy McVeigh is he did not go to the New York Times building." That sounds like defending terrorism to me.

What if a liberal said they're only problem with the 9/11 hijackers is they did not crash into the NY Post building? She said basically the same thing.

[dazzleman]

Thanks for the input, Professor Churchill.

I really don't know what terrorism against the NY Times BRTD is talking about.  I am not a fan of the NY Times, so you won't find me defending it in any case, but I have no idea what Ann Coulter is supposed to have done to that so-called newspaper.

She said "My only problem with Timothy McVeigh is he did not go to the New York Times building." That sounds like defending terrorism to me.

What if a liberal said they're only problem with the 9/11 hijackers is they did not crash into the NY Post building? She said basically the same thing.

I never heard that quote before.  I doubt she really meant it, but it's typical of her inflammatory rhetoric.  Radical liberals do it too, and against less deserving targets.  I won't defend the statement, because it's not right, and we should have consistency between conservatives and liberals in matters like this.

[Max Power]

Is Ann Coulter hot?

I'd definently do her

I didn't know you were gay.

[PADem]

No, but that does not diminish the truth and insight of her writings.

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

So you and Hitchabrut support terrorism against the New York Times?

Hunh?

You also support invading every Muslim-majority nation and converting the residents to Christianity? How sad.

What do you call that? A good start! Amen.

While we're at it we should abolish the states and hand power over to one big, powerful, effective Federal Government.

[I spent the winter writing songs about getting better]

Thanks for the input, Professor Churchill.

I really don't know what terrorism against the NY Times BRTD is talking about.  I am not a fan of the NY Times, so you won't find me defending it in any case, but I have no idea what Ann Coulter is supposed to have done to that so-called newspaper.

She said "My only problem with Timothy McVeigh is he did not go to the New York Times building." That sounds like defending terrorism to me.

What if a liberal said they're only problem with the 9/11 hijackers is they did not crash into the NY Post building? She said basically the same thing.

I never heard that quote before.  I doubt she really meant it, but it's typical of her inflammatory rhetoric.  Radical liberals do it too, and against less deserving targets.  I won't defend the statement, because it's not right, and we should have consistency between conservatives and liberals in matters like this.

Well I do, as I have never defended such a liberal statement, of course the only thing I've heard that even comes close is what Ward Churchill said, and I openly called him an asshole.

[??????????]

I'd have to say she's attractive, but not exactly "hot".

That being said, even as a conservative I don't like her.  She's too extreme and too bitter.

She certainly is not extreme. Her views on Islam are exactly on the money and certainly if the rest of the world got in line with her stance we'd quickly eliminate the threat of Islam worldwide.

[King]

Hell no.  Only Mike Naso is desperate enough to say Coulter is hot.

[Alcon]

Thanks for the input, Professor Churchill.

I really don't know what terrorism against the NY Times BRTD is talking about.  I am not a fan of the NY Times, so you won't find me defending it in any case, but I have no idea what Ann Coulter is supposed to have done to that so-called newspaper.

She said "My only problem with Timothy McVeigh is he did not go to the New York Times building." That sounds like defending terrorism to me.

What if a liberal said they're only problem with the 9/11 hijackers is they did not crash into the NY Post building? She said basically the same thing.

I never heard that quote before.  I doubt she really meant it, but it's typical of her inflammatory rhetoric.  Radical liberals do it too, and against less deserving targets.  I won't defend the statement, because it's not right, and we should have consistency between conservatives and liberals in matters like this.

Back up here man.

Not only did she say this, but she re-affirmed it, saying that she only wanted those in the editorial section to die, or something equatable to that.

Much of what she says she continues to back up.

I do not really see radical liberals with such a following among even mainstream liberals as Coulter has among mainstream conservatives saying stuff like this and backing it up.

Just saying "the other side does it, so let's do it too!" is never going to accomplish anything but make politics suck.

[Max Power]

Hell no.  Only Mike Naso is desperate enough to say Coulter is hot.

Hahaha!!! I know, he would.

[dazzleman]

I never heard that quote before.  I doubt she really meant it, but it's typical of her inflammatory rhetoric.  Radical liberals do it too, and against less deserving targets.  I won't defend the statement, because it's not right, and we should have consistency between conservatives and liberals in matters like this.

Well I do, as I have never defended such a liberal statement, of course the only thing I've heard that even comes close is what Ward Churchill said, and I openly called him an asshole.

I give you credit for condeming Churchill.  It's still a little different thought to focus dislike on the New York Times, which Coulter did, as opposed to saying that the American people in general are deserving of having violence visited upon them, as Churchill said.

I don't advocate violence against people, but it seems Churchill is attacking a much broader base, so I don't concede a moral equivalency between him and Coulter.

[dazzleman]

I never heard that quote before.  I doubt she really meant it, but it's typical of her inflammatory rhetoric.  Radical liberals do it too, and against less deserving targets.  I won't defend the statement, because it's not right, and we should have consistency between conservatives and liberals in matters like this.

Back up here man.

Not only did she say this, but she re-affirmed it, saying that she only wanted those in the editorial section to die, or something equatable to that.

Much of what she says she continues to back up.

I do not really see radical liberals with such a following among even mainstream liberals as Coulter has among mainstream conservatives saying stuff like this and backing it up.

Just saying "the other side does it, so let's do it too!" is never going to accomplish anything but make politics suck.

Well, it seems her calls for violence are against a very well-defined and limited group... 

Seriously, I don't advocate calls for violence, but Coulter advocates violence against a handful of people, while the great Professor Churchill advocates indiscriminate violence against the American people in general.  I think there's a difference in degree here.  Extreme liberals often make the case that the American people in general are deserving of having violence visited upon them for whatever reason, something that I have never heard Coulter advocate.

I also don't think that Ann Coulter has the serious following among conservatives that you seem to think she has.  Some of what she says is amusing, mostly tongue in cheek, but I don't think too many conservatives take her that seriously.  And no matter how much conservatives hate that dreadful NY Times, the reaction among conservatives would be horror if it were ever actually attacked.

[Max Power]

If you think that's hot, lay off the Jesus Juice.