Alabama Megathread: Bombshell allegations
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 01, 2024, 03:58:59 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  Alabama Megathread: Bombshell allegations
« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 ... 73
Author Topic: Alabama Megathread: Bombshell allegations  (Read 162175 times)
This account no longer in use.
cxs018
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,282


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #75 on: June 07, 2017, 12:12:28 PM »

Filing deadline has passed.
Logged
Attorney General & PPT Dwarven Dragon
Dwarven Dragon
Atlas Politician
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,931
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.42, S: -0.52

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #76 on: June 07, 2017, 12:32:02 PM »


If I was in the democratic party, I would work behind the scenes to get Sessions to run as an independent candidate, which I imagine is still possible, and then hope for a split in the GOP vote that allows whoever the dems nominate to win.
Logged
The Other Castro
Castro2020
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,230
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #77 on: June 07, 2017, 04:38:50 PM »


If I was in the democratic party, I would work behind the scenes to get Sessions to run as an independent candidate, which I imagine is still possible, and then hope for a split in the GOP vote that allows whoever the dems nominate to win.

Dems to Sessions: hey you should totally run you'd win
Sessions: oh really?
Dems: yeah do it trust me
Sessions: lol ok, I'm oblivious to your obvious ulterior motives
Logged
MT Treasurer
IndyRep
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,275
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #78 on: June 07, 2017, 05:30:30 PM »


If I was in the democratic party, I would work behind the scenes to get Sessions to run as an independent candidate, which I imagine is still possible, and then hope for a split in the GOP vote that allows whoever the dems nominate to win.

If you were the Democratic Party, the Republicans would have a filibuster-proof majority in the Senate.
Logged
Suburbia
bronz4141
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,666
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #79 on: June 08, 2017, 10:57:48 PM »

If A.G. Sessions resigns, is it too late for him to run for his seat again? He can be a Trump loyalist from the Senate.
Logged
PragmaticPopulist
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,236
Ireland, Republic of


Political Matrix
E: -7.61, S: -5.57

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #80 on: June 12, 2017, 11:28:55 AM »

If Moore gets the nomination, this isn't gonna be an obvious hold for the GOP. They will be favored, but you never know with special election turnout. Democratic enthusiasm + Moore's toxicity could be just enough for the GOP to blow an election they should've won
Logged
The Other Castro
Castro2020
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,230
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #81 on: July 07, 2017, 08:21:31 PM »

There was a straw poll at a candidate forum:

Mo Brooks - 101
Roy Moore - 74
Trip Pittman - 8
Randy Brinson - 6
Bryan Peeples - 5
Mary Maxwell - 3
Luther Strange - 3

Should be noted that this was in Brooks' hometown, and Strange didn't attend the forum.

http://www.al.com/news/huntsville/index.ssf/2017/07/mo_brooks_first_luther_strange.html
Logged
heatcharger
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,525
Sweden


Political Matrix
E: -1.04, S: -0.24

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #82 on: July 07, 2017, 08:28:57 PM »

Also just saw this Mo Brooks internal:

Moore 31%
Strange 23%
Brooks 21%
Logged
BuckeyeNut
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,458


Political Matrix
E: -8.65, S: -7.30

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #83 on: July 07, 2017, 09:09:06 PM »

Also just saw this Mo Brooks internal:

Moore 31%
Strange 23%
Brooks 21%

Jesus.
Logged
GlobeSoc
The walrus
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,980


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #84 on: July 07, 2017, 09:34:02 PM »

A Moore vs Strange runoff would be a wrapped present sent directly to the Alabama dems with expedited shipping
Logged
_
Not_Madigan
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,103
United States


Political Matrix
E: -3.29, S: -7.74

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #85 on: July 07, 2017, 09:39:01 PM »
« Edited: July 07, 2017, 09:51:19 PM by Not_Madigan »

Also just saw this Mo Brooks internal:

Moore 31%
Strange 23%
Brooks 21%

Oh dear god....

Moore would make it just Lean R.
Logged
100% pro-life no matter what
ExtremeRepublican
Moderators
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,782


Political Matrix
E: 7.35, S: 5.57


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #86 on: July 07, 2017, 11:00:34 PM »

I definitely want a Moore vs. Brooks runoff here, because I like them both a lot.
Logged
BuckeyeNut
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,458


Political Matrix
E: -8.65, S: -7.30

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #87 on: July 08, 2017, 12:06:29 AM »

Republicans aren't going to lose this race, but I could see Democrats coming within 7-10 points of winning if Strange is the nominee. Moore would also underperform, but I think he would win by 8-12 in the end. Brooks is the most electable Republican, he would win by 15-20 IMO.

Lean/Likely R with Strange or Moore, Likely/Safe R with Brooks.

Not that Strange isn't scandalous, but how would he underperform Moore?
Logged
MT Treasurer
IndyRep
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,275
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #88 on: July 08, 2017, 06:23:26 PM »

Republicans aren't going to lose this race, but I could see Democrats coming within 7-10 points of winning if Strange is the nominee. Moore would also underperform, but I think he would win by 8-12 in the end. Brooks is the most electable Republican, he would win by 15-20 IMO.

Lean/Likely R with Strange or Moore, Likely/Safe R with Brooks.

Not that Strange isn't scandalous, but how would he underperform Moore?

Because Strange is the embodiment of the corrupt (Washington) establishment and we could see very depressed Republican turnout if he is the nominee. Trump has said far worse things than Roy Moore, and he won AL by 28 points. Moore would energize the GOP base more than Strange, and Democratic turnout will be high anyway because it's a special election.
Logged
Heisenberg
SecureAmerica
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,112
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #89 on: July 08, 2017, 06:31:54 PM »

Republicans aren't going to lose this race, but I could see Democrats coming within 7-10 points of winning if Strange is the nominee. Moore would also underperform, but I think he would win by 8-12 in the end. Brooks is the most electable Republican, he would win by 15-20 IMO.

Lean/Likely R with Strange or Moore, Likely/Safe R with Brooks.

Not that Strange isn't scandalous, but how would he underperform Moore?

Because Strange is the embodiment of the corrupt (Washington) establishment and we could see very depressed Republican turnout if he is the nominee. Trump has said far worse things than Roy Moore, and he won AL by 28 points. Moore would energize the GOP base more than Strange, and Democratic turnout will be high anyway because it's a special election.
Not just the Washington establishment, but the Montgomery, AL establishment as well.
Logged
MT Treasurer
IndyRep
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,275
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #90 on: July 08, 2017, 06:43:34 PM »

Not just the Washington establishment, but the Montgomery, AL establishment as well.

Yes, exactly. I think all the McConnell groups which are spending so much money on ads supporting Strange don't realize that they could be putting the seat in jeopardy. I'm sure the same "strategists" that think propping up Strange is a good idea are planning on sending Roy Blunt to campaign for him or something like that.
Logged
Devout Centrist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,147
United States


Political Matrix
E: -99.99, S: -99.99

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #91 on: July 09, 2017, 10:30:07 AM »

The Luther Burger vs. Mediocre Mo vs. Religious Radical Roy: Senate Race of the Century
Logged
smoltchanov
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,394
Russian Federation


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #92 on: July 09, 2017, 10:44:12 AM »

The Luther Burger vs. Mediocre Mo vs. Religious Radical Roy: Senate Race of the Century

Well, it's Alabama after all. As of late - one of the most conservative states of USA... With Deep Southern heritage and not enough Blacks (compared with Mississippi and Louisiana) it will be Republican stronghold for decades.
Logged
Co-Chair Bagel23
Bagel23
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,369
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.48, S: -1.83

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #93 on: July 10, 2017, 07:20:37 PM »

Doug Jones is such a strong and good candidate, it's hard to watch him in such an unfair race. If only this was in a more blue state.
Logged
Skunk
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,454
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.03, S: -9.48

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #94 on: July 11, 2017, 12:36:24 AM »

Mo Brooks put out an called 'Build the Wall' that's been trending bigly on YouTube:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OZ4VtwpxTms

LOL at the comments

...I thought Mo Brooks was supposed to be the most "sane" of the Republicans.
Logged
Co-Chair Bagel23
Bagel23
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,369
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.48, S: -1.83

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #95 on: July 11, 2017, 01:33:11 AM »

Mo Brooks put out an called 'Build the Wall' that's been trending bigly on YouTube:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OZ4VtwpxTms

LOL at the comments

...I thought Mo Brooks was supposed to be the most "sane" of the Republicans.

Everything in comparison my friend...
Logged
Badger
badger
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 40,464
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #96 on: July 11, 2017, 05:58:09 PM »

When I see legit polls showing Moore with a good chance to win, not just make, the primary runoff, I'll get worked up. Until then, meh.
Logged
windjammer
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,525
France


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #97 on: July 11, 2017, 06:26:54 PM »

When I see legit polls showing Moore with a good chance to win, not just make, the primary runoff, I'll get worked up. Until then, meh.
Well, we all know that republicans are going to win this anyway but I'm not particularly sure that Luther Strange would perform better than Moore, as he's literally a little snake establishment who has underperformed elections before (2006 Lt Governor), not a good fit for Alabama considering its Trumpist nature and the recent corruption scandals.

The best candidate of the 3 is definitely Mo Brooks as he's a total racist scumbag having a platform forthe Trump wall and against "war on whites", he would definitely turn up the republican base, and turnout matters the most for special elections.

Logged
PragmaticPopulist
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,236
Ireland, Republic of


Political Matrix
E: -7.61, S: -5.57

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #98 on: July 12, 2017, 12:43:21 PM »

Senate Leadership Fund is out with an ad attacking Mo Brooks for being a traitor to Trump.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TxqIUOdc908

IDK if this really will damage him, but if it does, it could give Roy Moore an opening, where Brooks is too damaged and Strange is just too weak.
Logged
PragmaticPopulist
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,236
Ireland, Republic of


Political Matrix
E: -7.61, S: -5.57

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #99 on: July 14, 2017, 05:11:16 PM »

I thought Kay Ivey was smart, but she just gave Roy Moore an opening. If the senate race was held in 2018 I think the political climate would be different in Alabama.
You're probably right. If it were held in 2018, the Republican base might be less willing to choose an anti-establishment candidate. Right now, they just want to embarrass establishment Republicans by nominating the candidate the establishment hates the most, whether or not the candidate is electable.
Logged
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 ... 73  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.046 seconds with 10 queries.