Union Membership by State (2004)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 30, 2024, 02:20:37 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  Union Membership by State (2004)
« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2
Author Topic: Union Membership by State (2004)  (Read 2110 times)
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,726
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: July 24, 2005, 10:14:22 AM »



Make of that what you will.

Note that New York (at about 24% of the workforce, something like 12pts above the U.S average) would be below average in the U.K (where the highest is Northern Ireland with about 40%. Highest in England is the North East with about 35%) a country with a reasonably similer workforce structure in other respects.
Logged
Akno21
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,066
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: July 24, 2005, 10:36:21 AM »

Why is Alaska relatively high?

With a few exceptions, it looks like the 2004 map.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,726
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: July 24, 2005, 10:59:44 AM »


I'd assume that it's either the oil workers or there's a hellofalot of public sector workers in Alaska

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Only if you want it to look like the 2004 map
Logged
KEmperor
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,454
United States


Political Matrix
E: 8.00, S: -0.05

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: July 24, 2005, 12:31:04 PM »


I'd assume that it's either the oil workers or there's a hellofalot of public sector workers in Alaska


That would be my assumption as well.


With a few exceptions, it looks like the 2004 map.

Not really.
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: July 24, 2005, 01:14:09 PM »

I'd have thought Iowa would be higher.
Logged
KEmperor
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,454
United States


Political Matrix
E: 8.00, S: -0.05

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: July 24, 2005, 01:16:53 PM »

I'd have thought Iowa would be higher.

Farmers dont unionize.  It's why most of the plains states are so low.
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: July 24, 2005, 01:20:06 PM »

Bama is also surprising.
Logged
KEmperor
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,454
United States


Political Matrix
E: 8.00, S: -0.05

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: July 24, 2005, 01:26:12 PM »


How so?
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: July 24, 2005, 01:27:46 PM »

I didn't expect it to be highish. It's higher than anywhere else in the South but W.Va. and Kentucky.
Logged
Dave from Michigan
9iron768
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,298
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: July 24, 2005, 01:30:31 PM »

Here  in Michigan it's high 22% I think, Michigan is very pro union.
Logged
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,747


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: July 24, 2005, 01:57:58 PM »

But I thought that New Yorkers were supposed to all be "latte liberals".
Logged
Bono
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,699
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: July 24, 2005, 02:00:22 PM »

But I thought that New Yorkers were supposed to all be "latte liberals".

Do you know who did the unionized workers voted for?
Logged
patrick1
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,865


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: July 24, 2005, 02:01:25 PM »

I didn't expect it to be highish. It's higher than anywhere else in the South but W.Va. and Kentucky.

Alabama's numbers are probably higher because of the steel industry in Birmingham and also Alabama has many foreign car makers who have set up shop.
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: July 24, 2005, 02:02:52 PM »

Alabama has many foreign car makers who have set up shop.
So does South Carolina.
Logged
patrick1
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,865


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: July 24, 2005, 02:04:28 PM »

Alabama has many foreign car makers who have set up shop.
So does South Carolina.

True but do they have a steel industry;)
Logged
AuH2O
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,239


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: July 24, 2005, 02:17:36 PM »

Unions are in decline everywhere in the US. In the South, foreign manufacturers have tried to avoid the unionization of their employees with good success. Actually that's a major reason they located in SC, AL, MS, TN etc. to begin with.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,726
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: July 24, 2005, 04:19:13 PM »


Not really; unions are quite strong in the old coalfields in Northern Alabama.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,726
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: July 24, 2005, 04:20:14 PM »

Alabama has many foreign car makers who have set up shop.
So does South Carolina.

Although the numbers in both Carolina's are freakishly low for historical reasons (the failure of the big textiles strike in the '30's).
Logged
Alcon
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,866
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: July 24, 2005, 04:31:54 PM »

I have to say that the colouring scheme is driving me to insanity...there's so little difference between the colours.  Is there a map with a more contrasting scheme?
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,726
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #19 on: July 24, 2005, 04:34:00 PM »

I have to say that the colouring scheme is driving me to insanity...there's so little difference between the colours.  Is there a map with a more contrasting scheme?

I could make another one, but I'm too tired at the moment. I didn't go for too great a contrast between the colours because it's only 2pts between each new colour (although I can seem 'em all fine).
Logged
Dave from Michigan
9iron768
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,298
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #20 on: July 24, 2005, 04:37:46 PM »

22% here in michigan i not suprised I would have though it was a little higher personally, mostly do to the auto industry.
Logged
KEmperor
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,454
United States


Political Matrix
E: 8.00, S: -0.05

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #21 on: July 24, 2005, 09:47:27 PM »

In other union news, the Teamsters have left the AFL-CIO along with the Service Employees International Union.  Looks like a civil war brewing in organized labor.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,726
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #22 on: July 25, 2005, 08:33:44 AM »

Have they actually left? Last I heard they were just boycotting the convention.
Not suprising at all though.
Logged
KEmperor
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,454
United States


Political Matrix
E: 8.00, S: -0.05

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #23 on: July 25, 2005, 09:06:43 AM »

Have they actually left? Last I heard they were just boycotting the convention.
Not suprising at all though.

Indeed:

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,163484,00.html
Logged
WalterMitty
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,572


Political Matrix
E: 1.68, S: -2.26

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #24 on: July 25, 2005, 10:33:24 AM »

union membership in north carolina is 2.7%, which is still far too high.
Logged
Pages: [1] 2  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.044 seconds with 12 queries.