Which is more immoral?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 23, 2024, 06:07:47 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Debate (Moderator: Torie)
  Which is more immoral?
« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 [3]
Poll
Question: Which is more immoral?
#1
a 20 year old of one gender marrying a 70 year old of the other gender
 
#2
two people the same age of the same gender marrying each other
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 42

Author Topic: Which is more immoral?  (Read 5573 times)
Speed of Sound
LiberalPA
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,166
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #50 on: July 26, 2005, 10:50:49 PM »

I disagree. You dont turn 18 and stop gaining maturity. Maturity is something that increases as you get older, no matter how old you are, but because the rate slows down as you get older, a percentage is needed.

He never said you didn't stop gaining maturity, only that at 18 you are 'mature enough' to decide who you want to marry.

I disagree. Not if you're picking someone who is 80 years old.

Are you mature enough to decide to have sexual relations with someone who is 80 years old?

As far as I see it, lots of people aren't particularly mature at eighteen, but that doesn't mean we deny them their rights because we don't think they are suitably mature for an eighteen year old. Why should we stop someone who is mature and say nineteen from marrying an eighty year old when two people who are immature and eighteen are perfectly allowed to marry each other?

An 18 year old is mature enough to marry another 18 year old, not an 80 year old.

How do you know?

It's my theory.
Precisely. It should not be imposed on the rest of the population.

So you think an 18 year old has the same maturity as an 80 year old?
it shouldnt be maturity by comparison, it should be 'are YOU mature enough to get married?" i think at 18, you are.
Logged
KillerPollo
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,984
Mexico


Political Matrix
E: -3.15, S: -0.82

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #51 on: July 26, 2005, 11:03:20 PM »

I disagree. You dont turn 18 and stop gaining maturity. Maturity is something that increases as you get older, no matter how old you are, but because the rate slows down as you get older, a percentage is needed.

He never said you didn't stop gaining maturity, only that at 18 you are 'mature enough' to decide who you want to marry.

I disagree. Not if you're picking someone who is 80 years old.

Are you mature enough to decide to have sexual relations with someone who is 80 years old?

As far as I see it, lots of people aren't particularly mature at eighteen, but that doesn't mean we deny them their rights because we don't think they are suitably mature for an eighteen year old. Why should we stop someone who is mature and say nineteen from marrying an eighty year old when two people who are immature and eighteen are perfectly allowed to marry each other?

An 18 year old is mature enough to marry another 18 year old, not an 80 year old.

How do you know?

It's my theory.
Precisely. It should not be imposed on the rest of the population.

So you think an 18 year old has the same maturity as an 80 year old?
it shouldnt be maturity by comparison, it should be 'are YOU mature enough to get married?" i think at 18, you are.

and at 17 11months you're not?
Logged
Hatman 🍁
EarlAW
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,024
Canada


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #52 on: July 26, 2005, 11:14:08 PM »

Yeah, maturity ages change as you get older, and is why I think you should only marry within your range. However, we are getting off my belief that this is really about equality. A marriage of an 18 year old and an 80 year old is not equality.
Logged
KillerPollo
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,984
Mexico


Political Matrix
E: -3.15, S: -0.82

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #53 on: July 26, 2005, 11:17:17 PM »

Yeah, maturity ages change as you get older, and is why I think you should only marry within your range. However, we are getting off my belief that this is really about equality. A marriage of an 18 year old and an 80 year old is not equality.

exactly my point. Maturity does not come overnight like the law makes you think.
Logged
Ebowed
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,596


Political Matrix
E: 4.13, S: 2.09

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #54 on: July 27, 2005, 01:44:19 AM »

I disagree. You dont turn 18 and stop gaining maturity. Maturity is something that increases as you get older, no matter how old you are, but because the rate slows down as you get older, a percentage is needed.

He never said you didn't stop gaining maturity, only that at 18 you are 'mature enough' to decide who you want to marry.

I disagree. Not if you're picking someone who is 80 years old.

Are you mature enough to decide to have sexual relations with someone who is 80 years old?

As far as I see it, lots of people aren't particularly mature at eighteen, but that doesn't mean we deny them their rights because we don't think they are suitably mature for an eighteen year old. Why should we stop someone who is mature and say nineteen from marrying an eighty year old when two people who are immature and eighteen are perfectly allowed to marry each other?

An 18 year old is mature enough to marry another 18 year old, not an 80 year old.

How do you know?

It's my theory.
Precisely. It should not be imposed on the rest of the population.
Using that logic, neither should my theory that 12 year olds shouldn't marry 18 year olds be imposed on the rest of the population.
Logged
John Dibble
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,732
Japan


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #55 on: July 27, 2005, 07:27:31 AM »

Yeah, maturity ages change as you get older, and is why I think you should only marry within your range. However, we are getting off my belief that this is really about equality. A marriage of an 18 year old and an 80 year old is not equality.

exactly my point. Maturity does not come overnight like the law makes you think.

18 is the point where you become an adult in this country. It isn't exact since maturity varies for every individual, but we simply look at 'averages' and determine that people are usually mature enough at that point to make their own decisions regarding marriage. It isn't perfect, but it would be impossible and impractical to make some test in which everyone's maturity is measured.

BTW Earl, is it wrong for an immature 40 year old to marry a very mature 40 year old?
Logged
Hatman 🍁
EarlAW
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,024
Canada


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #56 on: July 27, 2005, 01:14:54 PM »

Yeah, maturity ages change as you get older, and is why I think you should only marry within your range. However, we are getting off my belief that this is really about equality. A marriage of an 18 year old and an 80 year old is not equality.

exactly my point. Maturity does not come overnight like the law makes you think.

18 is the point where you become an adult in this country. It isn't exact since maturity varies for every individual, but we simply look at 'averages' and determine that people are usually mature enough at that point to make their own decisions regarding marriage. It isn't perfect, but it would be impossible and impractical to make some test in which everyone's maturity is measured.

BTW Earl, is it wrong for an immature 40 year old to marry a very mature 40 year old?

Haha nice try Dibble. There's always going to be exceptions. Maturity is a fuzzy matter anyways, as I said it is more about equality.
Logged
Emsworth
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,054


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #57 on: July 27, 2005, 01:55:33 PM »

I disagree. You dont turn 18 and stop gaining maturity. Maturity is something that increases as you get older, no matter how old you are, but because the rate slows down as you get older, a percentage is needed.

He never said you didn't stop gaining maturity, only that at 18 you are 'mature enough' to decide who you want to marry.

I disagree. Not if you're picking someone who is 80 years old.

Are you mature enough to decide to have sexual relations with someone who is 80 years old?

As far as I see it, lots of people aren't particularly mature at eighteen, but that doesn't mean we deny them their rights because we don't think they are suitably mature for an eighteen year old. Why should we stop someone who is mature and say nineteen from marrying an eighty year old when two people who are immature and eighteen are perfectly allowed to marry each other?

An 18 year old is mature enough to marry another 18 year old, not an 80 year old.

How do you know?

It's my theory.
Precisely. It should not be imposed on the rest of the population.
Using that logic, neither should my theory that 12 year olds shouldn't marry 18 year olds be imposed on the rest of the population.
If it's only your theory, then it should not be imposed on the rest of the population. But it's not just your theory.
Logged
Hatman 🍁
EarlAW
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,024
Canada


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #58 on: July 27, 2005, 03:29:27 PM »

I disagree. You dont turn 18 and stop gaining maturity. Maturity is something that increases as you get older, no matter how old you are, but because the rate slows down as you get older, a percentage is needed.

He never said you didn't stop gaining maturity, only that at 18 you are 'mature enough' to decide who you want to marry.

I disagree. Not if you're picking someone who is 80 years old.

Are you mature enough to decide to have sexual relations with someone who is 80 years old?

As far as I see it, lots of people aren't particularly mature at eighteen, but that doesn't mean we deny them their rights because we don't think they are suitably mature for an eighteen year old. Why should we stop someone who is mature and say nineteen from marrying an eighty year old when two people who are immature and eighteen are perfectly allowed to marry each other?

An 18 year old is mature enough to marry another 18 year old, not an 80 year old.

How do you know?

It's my theory.
Precisely. It should not be imposed on the rest of the population.
Using that logic, neither should my theory that 12 year olds shouldn't marry 18 year olds be imposed on the rest of the population.
If it's only your theory, then it should not be imposed on the rest of the population. But it's not just your theory.

Quote from: Restricted
You must be logged in to read this quote.
Logged
ilikeverin
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,409
Timor-Leste


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #59 on: July 27, 2005, 06:01:46 PM »

Yeah, maturity ages change as you get older, and is why I think you should only marry within your range. However, we are getting off my belief that this is really about equality. A marriage of an 18 year old and an 80 year old is not equality.

exactly my point. Maturity does not come overnight like the law makes you think.

18 is the point where you become an adult in this country. It isn't exact since maturity varies for every individual, but we simply look at 'averages' and determine that people are usually mature enough at that point to make their own decisions regarding marriage. It isn't perfect, but it would be impossible and impractical to make some test in which everyone's maturity is measured.

BTW Earl, is it wrong for an immature 40 year old to marry a very mature 40 year old?

Haha nice try Dibble. There's always going to be exceptions. Maturity is a fuzzy matter anyways, as I said it is more about equality.

What's to say that, if the people truly loved each other, they couldn't make the relationship equal?
Logged
John Dibble
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,732
Japan


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #60 on: July 27, 2005, 07:03:31 PM »

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Haha nice try Dibble. There's always going to be exceptions. Maturity is a fuzzy matter anyways, as I said it is more about equality.

Answer the question. You stated that an 18 year old isn't mature enough to marry an 80 year old - well now it's about 'equality' apparently. Which is it?
Logged
Hatman 🍁
EarlAW
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,024
Canada


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #61 on: July 27, 2005, 07:56:11 PM »

Yeah, maturity ages change as you get older, and is why I think you should only marry within your range. However, we are getting off my belief that this is really about equality. A marriage of an 18 year old and an 80 year old is not equality.

exactly my point. Maturity does not come overnight like the law makes you think.

18 is the point where you become an adult in this country. It isn't exact since maturity varies for every individual, but we simply look at 'averages' and determine that people are usually mature enough at that point to make their own decisions regarding marriage. It isn't perfect, but it would be impossible and impractical to make some test in which everyone's maturity is measured.

BTW Earl, is it wrong for an immature 40 year old to marry a very mature 40 year old?

Haha nice try Dibble. There's always going to be exceptions. Maturity is a fuzzy matter anyways, as I said it is more about equality.

What's to say that, if the people truly loved each other, they couldn't make the relationship equal?

It is impossible. Such a relationship could not be an equal one.

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Haha nice try Dibble. There's always going to be exceptions. Maturity is a fuzzy matter anyways, as I said it is more about equality.

Answer the question. You stated that an 18 year old isn't mature enough to marry an 80 year old - well now it's about 'equality' apparently. Which is it?

It's both.
Logged
John Dibble
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,732
Japan


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #62 on: July 27, 2005, 08:09:52 PM »

Yeah, maturity ages change as you get older, and is why I think you should only marry within your range. However, we are getting off my belief that this is really about equality. A marriage of an 18 year old and an 80 year old is not equality.

exactly my point. Maturity does not come overnight like the law makes you think.

18 is the point where you become an adult in this country. It isn't exact since maturity varies for every individual, but we simply look at 'averages' and determine that people are usually mature enough at that point to make their own decisions regarding marriage. It isn't perfect, but it would be impossible and impractical to make some test in which everyone's maturity is measured.

BTW Earl, is it wrong for an immature 40 year old to marry a very mature 40 year old?

Haha nice try Dibble. There's always going to be exceptions. Maturity is a fuzzy matter anyways, as I said it is more about equality.

What's to say that, if the people truly loved each other, they couldn't make the relationship equal?

It is impossible. Such a relationship could not be an equal one.

Why not?

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Haha nice try Dibble. There's always going to be exceptions. Maturity is a fuzzy matter anyways, as I said it is more about equality.
[/quote]

Answer the question. You stated that an 18 year old isn't mature enough to marry an 80 year old - well now it's about 'equality' apparently. Which is it?
[/quote]

It's both.
[/quote]

For the third time, answer the question.
Logged
Hatman 🍁
EarlAW
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,024
Canada


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #63 on: July 27, 2005, 10:30:21 PM »

Yeah, maturity ages change as you get older, and is why I think you should only marry within your range. However, we are getting off my belief that this is really about equality. A marriage of an 18 year old and an 80 year old is not equality.

exactly my point. Maturity does not come overnight like the law makes you think.

18 is the point where you become an adult in this country. It isn't exact since maturity varies for every individual, but we simply look at 'averages' and determine that people are usually mature enough at that point to make their own decisions regarding marriage. It isn't perfect, but it would be impossible and impractical to make some test in which everyone's maturity is measured.

BTW Earl, is it wrong for an immature 40 year old to marry a very mature 40 year old?

Haha nice try Dibble. There's always going to be exceptions. Maturity is a fuzzy matter anyways, as I said it is more about equality.

What's to say that, if the people truly loved each other, they couldn't make the relationship equal?

It is impossible. Such a relationship could not be an equal one.

Why not?


Because, the ages differ too much making it the opposite of eqaulity- ineqaulity

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Haha nice try Dibble. There's always going to be exceptions. Maturity is a fuzzy matter anyways, as I said it is more about equality.
[/quote]

Answer the question. You stated that an 18 year old isn't mature enough to marry an 80 year old - well now it's about 'equality' apparently. Which is it?
[/quote]

It's both.
[/quote]

For the third time, answer the question.
Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Is it wrong? perhaps. Should it be legal? yes If they are both 40, than it is an eqaul relationship.- at least on paper.
Logged
John Dibble
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,732
Japan


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #64 on: July 28, 2005, 06:46:21 AM »

Because, the ages differ too much making it the opposite of eqaulity- ineqaulity

Out of curiousity, define 'equality' for this kind of thing.

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

An 18 and 80 year old are technically the same on paper - they are both adult ages and are thereby equal under the law.
Logged
Hatman 🍁
EarlAW
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,024
Canada


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #65 on: July 28, 2005, 02:17:52 PM »

Because, the ages differ too much making it the opposite of eqaulity- ineqaulity

Out of curiousity, define 'equality' for this kind of thing.


Eqaulity means similar ages

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

An 18 and 80 year old are technically the same on paper - they are both adult ages and are thereby equal under the law.
[/quote]

their ages are not equal, or are not similar and are therefore not equal.
Logged
John Dibble
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,732
Japan


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #66 on: July 28, 2005, 02:24:08 PM »

Because, the ages differ too much making it the opposite of eqaulity- ineqaulity

Out of curiousity, define 'equality' for this kind of thing.


Eqaulity means similar ages

Age doesn't make people equals.

What I'm getting from this is that you think you know what's best for grown adults better than they do.
Logged
Hatman 🍁
EarlAW
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,024
Canada


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #67 on: July 28, 2005, 02:26:05 PM »

Because, the ages differ too much making it the opposite of eqaulity- ineqaulity

Out of curiousity, define 'equality' for this kind of thing.


Eqaulity means similar ages

Age doesn't make people equals.

What I'm getting from this is that you think you know what's best for grown adults better than they do.

Don't we all? Wink
Logged
John Dibble
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,732
Japan


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #68 on: July 28, 2005, 02:27:23 PM »

Because, the ages differ too much making it the opposite of eqaulity- ineqaulity

Out of curiousity, define 'equality' for this kind of thing.


Eqaulity means similar ages

Age doesn't make people equals.

What I'm getting from this is that you think you know what's best for grown adults better than they do.

Don't we all? Wink

No, I think that adults should be able to make their own decisions so long as they don't harm anyone else.
Logged
KillerPollo
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,984
Mexico


Political Matrix
E: -3.15, S: -0.82

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #69 on: July 28, 2005, 02:36:45 PM »

Because, the ages differ too much making it the opposite of eqaulity- ineqaulity

Out of curiousity, define 'equality' for this kind of thing.


Eqaulity means similar ages

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

An 18 and 80 year old are technically the same on paper - they are both adult ages and are thereby equal under the law.

their ages are not equal, or are not similar and are therefore not equal.
[/quote]

Again, Age matters not. Love knows no boundaries... except those of same-sex, and close relatives, and different species, other than that it's OK.
Logged
Hatman 🍁
EarlAW
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,024
Canada


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #70 on: July 28, 2005, 04:28:00 PM »

Because, the ages differ too much making it the opposite of eqaulity- ineqaulity

Out of curiousity, define 'equality' for this kind of thing.


Eqaulity means similar ages

Age doesn't make people equals.

What I'm getting from this is that you think you know what's best for grown adults better than they do.

Don't we all? Wink

No, I think that adults should be able to make their own decisions so long as they don't harm anyone else.

I meant on other issues. For example, you think it's best for the adults to have the right to own guns.
Logged
Speed of Sound
LiberalPA
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,166
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #71 on: July 28, 2005, 04:38:59 PM »

Because, the ages differ too much making it the opposite of eqaulity- ineqaulity

Out of curiousity, define 'equality' for this kind of thing.


Eqaulity means similar ages

Age doesn't make people equals.

What I'm getting from this is that you think you know what's best for grown adults better than they do.

Don't we all? Wink

No, I think that adults should be able to make their own decisions so long as they don't harm anyone else.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Logged
Defarge
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,588


Political Matrix
E: -3.13, S: -0.72

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #72 on: July 28, 2005, 05:24:45 PM »

Option 3.  No immoralness (if that's a word)
Logged
John Dibble
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,732
Japan


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #73 on: July 29, 2005, 07:46:18 AM »

Because, the ages differ too much making it the opposite of eqaulity- ineqaulity

Out of curiousity, define 'equality' for this kind of thing.


Eqaulity means similar ages

Age doesn't make people equals.

What I'm getting from this is that you think you know what's best for grown adults better than they do.

Don't we all? Wink

No, I think that adults should be able to make their own decisions so long as they don't harm anyone else.

I meant on other issues. For example, you think it's best for the adults to have the right to own guns.

They have the right to own guns, yes, but I can't say whether or not it's best for them - only they can determine that. Some people have perfectly valid reasons for not owning guns. So long as they don't try determining what's best for me by keeping me from owning one they can decide for themselves whether or not it's good for them.
Logged
Pages: 1 2 [3]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.079 seconds with 14 queries.