Which posters would you appoint to the Supreme Court?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 14, 2024, 02:40:20 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Individual Politics (Moderator: The Dowager Mod)
  Which posters would you appoint to the Supreme Court?
« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 10 ... 14
Author Topic: Which posters would you appoint to the Supreme Court?  (Read 41221 times)
Speed of Sound
LiberalPA
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,166
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #100 on: July 21, 2005, 10:32:22 PM »

Chief Justice:Smash

Associate Justices:

Opebo
A18
John Dibble
PBrunsel
TexasGurl
Emsworth
KeystonePhil
Peter Bell
Logged
Josh/Devilman88
josh4bush
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,079
Political Matrix
E: 3.61, S: -1.74

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #101 on: July 21, 2005, 10:59:14 PM »

Well no one picked me...

CJ- WMS
PBrushel
Harry
Joe Republic
Josh22
Sam
supersoulty
John Ford
Dazzleman

What do you think about this one?
Logged
I spent the winter writing songs about getting better
BRTD
Atlas Prophet
*****
Posts: 113,558
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -6.50, S: -6.67

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #102 on: July 21, 2005, 11:11:55 PM »


probably because you'd change your mind every time each side presented ine very case and would frequently overturn your own rulings depending on the last leadership convention you went to. Then again that might not be a bad thing, you'd be the ultimate unpredictable swing voter.

CJ- WMS
PBrushel
Harry
Joe Republic
Josh22
Sam
supersoulty
John Ford
Dazzleman

I don't think you're allowed to include yourself but, this gives us
2 populists, 4 conservatives, 1 liberal, 1 centrist and 1 wildly unpredictable swing voter. On economic issues, the court would be leaning to the right, depending on the last leadership convention you went to and Joe Republic, supersoulty might cross over though. Socially, it'd be pretty solidly conservative, Harry would be consistently liberal, and WMS and SamSpade might cross over at times, as might you depending on the last leadership convention you went to, but it's tough to see any really liberal rulings.
Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #103 on: July 21, 2005, 11:14:56 PM »

Chief Justice:Smash

Associate Justices:
KeystonePhil

I resign my position on the Court.  Tongue
Logged
I spent the winter writing songs about getting better
BRTD
Atlas Prophet
*****
Posts: 113,558
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -6.50, S: -6.67

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #104 on: July 21, 2005, 11:15:32 PM »
« Edited: July 21, 2005, 11:21:16 PM by Frente Farabundo Martí para la Liberación Nacional »

Here's my attempt at a very wacky and unpredictable court:

CJ: opebo
Keystone Phil
Flyers
John Dibble
StatesRights
Ebowed
Cosmo Kramer
AuH2O
Jake
Logged
Max Power
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,182
Political Matrix
E: 1.84, S: -8.09

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #105 on: July 21, 2005, 11:19:27 PM »

Glad to see I'm on sooooo many lists! Wink Tongue
Logged
dazzleman
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,777
Political Matrix
E: 1.88, S: 1.59

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #106 on: July 21, 2005, 11:19:30 PM »

SuperSoulty
Keystone Phil
Nym
Dibble
KEmperor
WMS
Siege40
New Federalist
Dazzleman



TexasGurl, I'm honored that you picked me.  Your picks are probably the biggest surprise that I have seen so far.

I appreciate all the people who have picked me for their Supreme Courts.  Thanks to all.
Logged
I spent the winter writing songs about getting better
BRTD
Atlas Prophet
*****
Posts: 113,558
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -6.50, S: -6.67

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #107 on: July 21, 2005, 11:22:49 PM »

And instead of my previous uber-left one, here's an attempt at a fairly balanced court that would still keep me happy.

CJ: Nation
Robert Goldwater
SamSpade
patrick1
jfern
Ebowed
Harry
Seige40
bullmoose
Logged
I spent the winter writing songs about getting better
BRTD
Atlas Prophet
*****
Posts: 113,558
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -6.50, S: -6.67

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #108 on: July 21, 2005, 11:25:38 PM »

Another question to everyone: where do you stand on strip club regulations? Strike them down or not?

I'll fill out my whole profile deal later. But I am quite confident both my uber-left and balanced courts would defend strip clubs.
Logged
Max Power
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,182
Political Matrix
E: 1.84, S: -8.09

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #109 on: July 21, 2005, 11:32:55 PM »

Another question to everyone: where do you stand on strip club regulations? Strike them down or not?

I'll fill out my whole profile deal later. But I am quite confident both my uber-left and balanced courts would defend strip clubs.
No regulations at all with the exception of rape or sexual assault and stuff like that.
Logged
Jake
dubya2004
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,621
Cuba


Political Matrix
E: -0.90, S: -0.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #110 on: July 21, 2005, 11:54:43 PM »

Another question to everyone: where do you stand on strip club regulations? Strike them down or not?

Strip clubs should be regulated to areas zoned by a city or municipality as a red light districts. As for restictions inside the club, maybe the reverse of whatever makes BRTD happy.
Logged
Gabu
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,386
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -4.32, S: -6.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #111 on: July 21, 2005, 11:56:21 PM »

Here's my attempt at a very wacky and unpredictable court:

CJ: opebo
Keystone Phil
Flyers
John Dibble
StatesRights
Ebowed
Cosmo Kramer
AuH2O
Jake

I'd replace John Dibble and Ebowed with Bono and Bandit, just to make it as extreme as you can get. Smiley
Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #112 on: July 22, 2005, 12:31:29 AM »


I'd replace John Dibble and Ebowed with Bono and Bandit, just to make it as extreme as you can get. Smiley

Except I'm not an extremist.
Logged
Max Power
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,182
Political Matrix
E: 1.84, S: -8.09

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #113 on: July 22, 2005, 12:35:17 AM »


I'd replace John Dibble and Ebowed with Bono and Bandit, just to make it as extreme as you can get. Smiley

Except I'm not an extremist.
Are you sure? I think you'd be rather extreme on Free NixonNow issues. Wink Tongue
Logged
Platypus
hughento
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,478
Australia


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #114 on: July 22, 2005, 02:33:35 AM »

Chief Justice: (presuming overseas-born is OK) JFK (and presuming he's a bit older

Assistant judges:

Ernest
Al
ColinW
Texasgurl
KEmperor
Bono
Alcon

and either Supersoulty, Clay, Peter Bell or Gabu for the last spot.
Let's assume that you have Supersoulty on the bench. That gives one six libertarians (JFK, Ernest, ColinW, KEmperor, Bono, and Alcon), two populists (Al and Supersoulty), and one liberal (Texasgurl).

Economic issues will see the six libertarians almost always voting as a conservative bloc. Supersoulty might swing to this side from time to time; in some cases, even Al might join them, leaving the court with a few 7-2 and 8-1 conservative economic decisions. On the other hand, it is also entirely possible that Bono alone disagrees, and that the other eight seek a somewhat moderate approach, in a particular decision on economic issues. Thus, Bono and Texasgurl might be in the minority on several occasions.

On social issues, I imagine that the court would easily be on the liberal side. Even if Bono and one of the other libertarians (probably ColinW) chooses to be conservative on the grounds of states' rights, Texasgurl would still furnish the liberal side with a 5-4 majority. KEmperor or Ernest would also have to swing to the other side for the conservatives to win.

I'm not too familiar with Clay's constitutional views. Putting Peter Bell or Gabu on the court merely solidifies the libertarian majority much further.

Fair enough. That seems like a pretty good court to me.
Logged
Gabu
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,386
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -4.32, S: -6.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #115 on: July 22, 2005, 03:27:42 AM »


I'd replace John Dibble and Ebowed with Bono and Bandit, just to make it as extreme as you can get. Smiley

Except I'm not an extremist.

Well, besides you and Flyers.  One of you two would just dissent no matter what the case is just to oppose the other. Tongue
Logged
Peter
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,030


Political Matrix
E: -0.77, S: -7.48

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #116 on: July 22, 2005, 08:57:07 AM »

Eminent Domain - Repeal Kelo v. New London, as it is local socialism and completely unconstitutional for the government to take land from private owners.

Thats contrary to the actual text though:

"nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation." --5th Amendment.

Clearly if there is just compensation, then private property may be taken for public use.

It is true that this clause in the 5th Amendment is somewhat socialist, but the Constitution was not meant to be a vehicle for any particular economic ideology that one cares to name, and thus rejecting the perfectly acceptable textual interpretation that I make based on ideological differences is invalid.
Logged
Gustaf
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,785


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: -0.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #117 on: July 22, 2005, 10:30:31 AM »

Chief Justice: JFK

AJs:

Peter Bell
Emsworth
KEmperor
Ernest
Sam Spade
Al
Gabu
Lewis Trondheim
Logged
I spent the winter writing songs about getting better
BRTD
Atlas Prophet
*****
Posts: 113,558
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -6.50, S: -6.67

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #118 on: July 22, 2005, 10:32:53 AM »

Another question to everyone: where do you stand on strip club regulations? Strike them down or not?

Strip clubs should be regulated to areas zoned by a city or municipality as a red light districts. As for restictions inside the club, maybe the reverse of whatever makes BRTD happy.

more reason I'd never appoint you.

As for the reverse of what makes me happy, I'm never ever going to a club where the girls can't touch the customers. Laws like that are actually probably devestating for strippers, since it would cut their tip money significantly. The whole reason why people tip them is so they can have their breasts in their face or have them wrap their legs around their neck, etc. Any city that passes such a law is only making things much worse for strippers, which is why passing such laws is very immoral.
Logged
Gustaf
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,785


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: -0.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #119 on: July 22, 2005, 10:36:20 AM »

Chief Justice: JFK

AJs:

Peter Bell
Emsworth
KEmperor
Ernest
Sam Spade
Al
Gabu
Lewis Trondheim

I guess this court would be solidly liberal on social issues and moderately conservative on economy. The idea though is to try and restrict judicial activism through picking people that would get what the job's about. Then towards the end of the list I tried to balance it idelogically as well.
Logged
tarheel-leftist85
krustytheklown
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,274
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #120 on: July 22, 2005, 10:58:53 AM »

Cheif Justice:  Nation
Associate Justice:  NickshepDEM
Others:  Ebowed, Harry, Cosmo Kramer, Frodo, Democratic Hawk, Governor MAS 117, and others
Logged
John Dibble
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,732
Japan


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #121 on: July 22, 2005, 11:00:32 AM »

Chief Justice: JFK

AJs:

Peter Bell
Emsworth
KEmperor
Ernest
Sam Spade
Al
Gabu
Lewis Trondheim

That's a good court. I think it'd be somewhat moderate on ecomonics(maybe lean a bit left, but not strongly) and liberal on social issues.
Logged
Emsworth
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,054


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #122 on: July 22, 2005, 11:30:24 AM »

Chief Justice: JFK

AJs:

Peter Bell
Emsworth
KEmperor
Ernest
Sam Spade
Al
Gabu
Lewis Trondheim
An interesting court. I notice two liberals (Gabu and Lewis), one populist (Al), and six libertarians (Sam, Ernest, KEmperor, Peter, JFK, and me).

Economic issues will probably see a few 6-3 conservative decisions. However, Peter Bell and/or Ernest will probably swing to the other side on many commerce clause cases. Thus, we might see 5-4 moderately liberal, or moderately conservative, decisions on economic issues.

Social issues should see a solid liberal majority. There would probably be a few 7-2 or 8-1 decisions. Sam Spade, Gabu, and Ernest may experience conservative swings, but that should still leave a 5-4 liberal majority.
Logged
WMS
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,557


Political Matrix
E: -3.48, S: -1.22

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #123 on: July 22, 2005, 11:54:43 AM »

More appreciation to hand out!

This court is about as centrist and well-reasoned as I can make it....

Chief Justice: Peter Bell

Associate Justices:

Joe Republic
Gabu
Ben
Q
Sam Spade
MHS2002
Alcon
John Ford
------------------------------------------------

I also had in mind to include WMS, Supersoulty, thefactor, Nym90, and some others, but there are only nine slots to fill, so...............


Expand the Court! Expand the Court! Wink

Well no one picked me...

CJ- WMS
PBrushel
Harry
Joe Republic
Josh22
Sam
supersoulty
John Ford
Dazzleman

What do you think about this one?

Yay! I get to be Chief Justice! Cheesy
Logged
Peter
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,030


Political Matrix
E: -0.77, S: -7.48

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #124 on: July 22, 2005, 12:53:35 PM »

This court is about as centrist and well-reasoned as I can make it....

Chief Justice: Peter Bell

Associate Justices:

Joe Republic
Gabu
Ben
Q
Sam Spade
MHS2002
Alcon
John Ford

Thanks for making me CJ! Wink

The Court would likely lean left on social issues and moderately right economically. We have the following breakdowns: Libertarian (Bell, Alcon, Q); Consensus Centrist (Gabu, Ben, Joe); Conservative (MHS2002); Populist (Ford); Difficult to place (Spade). I speak of consensus centrists as being very much in the mold of the modern O'Connor.

The consensus centrists would in effect control the Court and would probably do their best to vote as a bloc.

On economic issues, the libertarians, Sam and MHS could band together to form a majority, though I would be likely to join with Ford on certain issues, it would then depend on the consensus centrists to make their bed. The libertarian bloc could control the social issues, most likely being joined by Gabu and Ben.
Logged
Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 10 ... 14  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.068 seconds with 11 queries.