Hitler or Stalin: Who Was Worse
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 28, 2024, 05:45:32 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Discussion
  History (Moderator: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee)
  Hitler or Stalin: Who Was Worse
« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2] 3
Author Topic: Hitler or Stalin: Who Was Worse  (Read 16621 times)
dunn
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,053


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #25 on: April 28, 2004, 04:57:20 AM »

Hitler... the time scale is horrific... and he was only getting started...
exectly
Logged
??????????
StatesRights
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,126
Political Matrix
E: 7.61, S: 0.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #26 on: April 28, 2004, 08:18:42 AM »

What is worse is that the Roosevelt Administration pretty much knew what was going on and never publicly condemned the slaughter. That is why most Americans were shocked when they found out about the camps.
Logged
dunn
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,053


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #27 on: April 28, 2004, 08:58:45 AM »

What is worse is that the Roosevelt Administration pretty much knew what was going on and never publicly condemned the slaughter. That is why most Americans were shocked when they found out about the camps.
true. The allies could have bombed Auswich - they knew and had the maps
Logged
??????????
StatesRights
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,126
Political Matrix
E: 7.61, S: 0.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #28 on: April 28, 2004, 09:15:33 AM »

Bombed Auswich? Wouldn't that have killed a lot of innocents? I hope you are being sarcastic.
Logged
Middle-aged Europe
Old Europe
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,221
Ukraine


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #29 on: April 28, 2004, 09:37:32 AM »
« Edited: April 28, 2004, 09:50:30 AM by Old Europe »

Those other than Jews were not set up for EXTERMINATION for NO apparent reason. It is still a huge mystery to most people why he picked on them. People lose sleep over it.

I think I once heard that Hitler´s parents had anti-semitic prejudices themselves or something like that. Although they surely did not indoctrinate him to gas all Jews in his childhood, he was raised and socialized to dislike all Jews because just they are Jews. It´s the same with the Austrian right-wing populist Jörg Haider. His parents were both members of the NSDAP/Nazi party during the Third Reich.

To have anti-semitic parents doesn´t make you automatically a Nazi, but it can help a lot. Wink
Logged
dunn
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,053


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #30 on: April 28, 2004, 09:37:55 AM »

Bombed Auswich? Wouldn't that have killed a lot of innocents? I hope you are being sarcastic.
with 10,000 innocents gas to death daily bombing the facilities wouls probably killed dozens/hundreths that are about to die anyway and save hunderths of thousends, this offer was considered
Logged
Middle-aged Europe
Old Europe
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,221
Ukraine


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #31 on: April 28, 2004, 09:49:32 AM »
« Edited: April 28, 2004, 10:37:49 AM by Old Europe »

Though I do disagree with Hitler on almost every single issue he preached I do think he helped the economy of Germany revive from the Depression. I think the whole war could have been largely avoided if the French hadn't been so pushy on the Germans demanding so much money that it bankrupt Germany. Also the French actions in the Rhineland were absolutely dispicable. The Treaty of Versaille is exactly the reason that WW2 happened.

I believe I read somewhere that Germany´s economy already began to recover when Hitler became chancellor. So, it would be the merit of the preceding governments and Hitler took just the credit.

An other argument would be that the economic boom was mainly achieved through the massive military build-up that took place in the 30ies. To rise the defense spending (in this case, it would be more a "attack spending", I suppose Wink ) by hundreds of per cent with the goal to conquer the whole continent (world?) and to exterminate a whole religious group isn´t exactly something I would nominate someone for the Nobel prize for economics.

But I agree with you on the Treaty of Versailles, although we had probably done the same to the French, if we had been the winners of World War I.
Logged
Gustaf
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,779


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: -0.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #32 on: April 28, 2004, 10:34:10 AM »

Hitler was Austrian, Austrian anti-semitism is much older and stronger than German anti-semitism. A joke I once heard ran like this: "Austrians are the world's best PR-people. They made Hitler a German and Mozart an Austrian". Wink That obviously doesn't explain it fully, of course.

Kodratos, are you certain that gays weren't killed b/c they were gay? I thought that was the way it was. It's true that there were many homosexuals within the Nazi ranks up-to the Night of Long Knifes, but none after that I think. And, the claims about Hitler's sexuality has never been proven, as far as I know. He was rather normal in that area I believe. He was also a vegetarian and a teetotaller. Whatever you make out of that... Wink
Logged
Chiahead
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 251


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #33 on: April 28, 2004, 03:16:51 PM »

When it comes to the soviet union, it really wasn't communism, it was socialism....

The basic ideals behind communism arent' that bad, just they don't work and can't be implemented.  Well, some unions of today could have communistic ideas in some cases.
Logged
dunn
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,053


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #34 on: April 28, 2004, 03:18:04 PM »

When it comes to the soviet union, it really wasn't communism, it was socialism....

The basic ideals behind communism arent' that bad, just they don't work and can't be implemented.  Well, some unions of today could have communistic ideas in some cases.
No
it was Bolshevism
Logged
Gustaf
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,779


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: -0.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #35 on: April 29, 2004, 12:26:04 PM »

When it comes to the soviet union, it really wasn't communism, it was socialism....

The basic ideals behind communism arent' that bad, just they don't work and can't be implemented.  Well, some unions of today could have communistic ideas in some cases.

Ehhh...what? The Soviet Union was more Communist than it was socialist. I'd say Stalinist, lol.
Logged
PBrunsel
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,537


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #36 on: April 29, 2004, 03:03:45 PM »

"One death is a tragedy, one million is a satistic."
-Josef Stalin, 1939.

Logged
The Duke
JohnD.Ford
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,270


Political Matrix
E: 0.13, S: -1.23

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #37 on: April 30, 2004, 01:54:03 AM »

I think one reason Hitler's death toll is lower is that someone stood up to him.  No one ever stood up to old Joe Stalin.  I vote Hitler.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,719
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #38 on: April 30, 2004, 08:18:43 AM »


True
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,719
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #39 on: April 30, 2004, 08:19:27 AM »

I think one reason Hitler's death toll is lower is that someone stood up to him.  No one ever stood up to old Joe Stalin.  I vote Hitler.

More or less my argument Wink
Logged
dunn
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,053


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #40 on: April 30, 2004, 10:43:21 AM »

Smiley
Logged
Gustaf
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,779


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: -0.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #41 on: May 01, 2004, 09:20:32 AM »

Good point Ford. Stalin was a Mickey Mouse fan, btw. Just to say something... Wink
Logged
MAS117
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,206
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #42 on: May 01, 2004, 09:26:02 AM »

Hitler, for the way he killed the Jews.
Logged
© tweed
Miamiu1027
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,562
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #43 on: May 01, 2004, 10:34:39 AM »

Hitler...if Hitler had been in power as long as Stalin was it would be No Contest; Hitler wins death toll.
Logged
Brambila
Brambilla
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,088


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #44 on: May 02, 2004, 09:14:56 PM »

People forget that Stalin also killed millions of Jews, and also Catholics, serfs, and pretty much anyone who disagreed with him including Trotsky (OUCH!).

Stalin was definately worse. However, Hitler has an identity for being worse because he admitted he was evil. Stalin just tried to hide it Wink
Logged
??????????
StatesRights
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,126
Political Matrix
E: 7.61, S: 0.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #45 on: May 02, 2004, 09:38:28 PM »

Hitler sticks out more in history because he lost! Stalin won WW2 but if he had been overrun by the allies (which I agree w/Patton on). Then we would see Stalin in the same light.
Logged
dunn
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,053


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #46 on: May 03, 2004, 02:00:45 PM »

People forget that Stalin also killed millions of Jews, and also Catholics, serfs, and pretty much anyone who disagreed with him including Trotsky (OUCH!).

Stalin was definately worse. However, Hitler has an identity for being worse because he admitted he was evil. Stalin just tried to hide it Wink
Stalin ruled for 30 years, can you imagin what it would look after 30 years of Hitler?
Logged
Gustaf
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,779


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: -0.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #47 on: May 04, 2004, 06:42:45 AM »

Hitler sticks out more in history because he lost! Stalin won WW2 but if he had been overrun by the allies (which I agree w/Patton on). Then we would see Stalin in the same light.

I'm not sure that he would have. And Europe might not have survived another war. The world was pretty worn out at that time.
Logged
Gustaf
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,779


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: -0.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #48 on: May 04, 2004, 06:43:42 AM »

Oh, and I have finally made up my mind.

I vote Stalin, since he was more effective. Sure, Hitler was bad for his short period of time, but it's significant that he lasted such few years. Hitler messed up, Stalin didn't.
Logged
??????????
StatesRights
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,126
Political Matrix
E: 7.61, S: 0.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #49 on: May 04, 2004, 12:38:11 PM »

We should run a Poll on Pol Pot or Ho Chi Minh or Kim Jung IL!
Logged
Pages: 1 [2] 3  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.057 seconds with 12 queries.