Why did Wilson win NH in 1916?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 29, 2024, 04:29:16 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Discussion
  History (Moderator: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee)
  Why did Wilson win NH in 1916?
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Why did Wilson win NH in 1916?  (Read 2323 times)
nini2287
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,616


Political Matrix
E: 2.77, S: -3.39

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: July 12, 2005, 03:52:22 PM »
« edited: July 13, 2005, 12:28:35 AM by nini2287 »

Granted it was only by 56 votes, but still why was there such a strong Wilson following there?
Logged
A18
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,794
Political Matrix
E: 9.23, S: -6.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: July 12, 2005, 04:23:50 PM »

Check that title again.
Logged
The Dowager Mod
texasgurl
Moderators
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,973
United States


Political Matrix
E: -9.48, S: -8.57

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: July 12, 2005, 04:27:53 PM »

In one New Hampshire county, a clerk had switched the votes for the candidates. It was originally reported that Hughes had received 225 votes, Wilson 88. Upon investigation, it was discovered that Wilson received 225 votes, and Hughes 88 votes.
Logged
Chancellor Tanterterg
Mr. X
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,343
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: July 12, 2005, 05:05:37 PM »

Don't know why Wilson won
Logged
PBrunsel
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,537


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: July 12, 2005, 05:36:43 PM »

Texasgurl is right. Beat me to it. Tongue
Logged
A18
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,794
Political Matrix
E: 9.23, S: -6.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: July 12, 2005, 06:02:00 PM »


That does absolutely nothing to answer the question.
Logged
nini2287
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,616


Political Matrix
E: 2.77, S: -3.39

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: July 13, 2005, 12:28:44 AM »


Thanks.  Corrected.
Logged
jimrtex
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,817
Marshall Islands


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: July 14, 2005, 06:20:43 PM »

Granted it was only by 56 votes, but still why was there such a strong Wilson following there?
New Hampshire was the 2nd most Democratic state in New England after Connecticut from the Civil War onward, with the Democrat candidate usually getting in the 45-50% range but never quite winning.   This was 15-20% ahead of Vermont.

From 1908-1920, NH was the most Democratic state in New England (and almost was in 1924 despite having native son Coolidge running for the Republicans).  Wilson was able to narrowly win in NH, while running close in Maine, Massachusetts, Rhode Island, and Connecticut.  But the relative margin between the states was not atypical.

In 1928, there was big swing to the Democrats in the southern New England states, likely due to the larger percentage of Catholics, and larger recent immigration.  From 1928, until 1968 New Hampshire was more Democratic than Maine or Vermont.
Logged
PBrunsel
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,537


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: July 14, 2005, 06:52:31 PM »

I may have it.

Becuase he was able to tie Hughes to Teddy Roosevelt and the pro-war people. The New York Times ran an ad from October 21st to Election Day 1916 that said:

"Our sons our alive, not cannon foder
Our wives are happy, not widows.

The choice is clear, Wilson and Marshal and Peace

or

Hughes and Roosevelt and War!"

TR hurt Hughes (who he called "The Bearded Iceberg") by campagingin for Hughes while screaming for war.

Logged
jimrtex
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,817
Marshall Islands


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: July 15, 2005, 02:45:06 AM »

Granted it was only by 56 votes, but still why was there such a strong Wilson following there?
From 1908-1920, NH was the most Democratic state in New England (and almost was in 1924 despite having native son Coolidge running for the Republicans).  Wilson was able to narrowly win in NH, while running close in Maine, Massachusetts, Rhode Island, and Connecticut.  But the relative margin between the states was not atypical.
In 1916, Wilson only carried a few counties in NH, but in particular he carried Hillsborough County which includes Manchester and Nashua.   This suggests that there was enough of a mill town element in NH to tip it slightly more Democrat than its neighbors.

The results for Maine are interesting.  Wilson carried some counties along the coast, and was reasonably close elsewhere.  But Hughes rolled up a 40% margin in Aroostook County.  The county had 8,300 votes, but produced a 3,400 vote plurality for Hughes.  Statewide Hughes won by 5,400 votes out of 136,000 cast.
Logged
bullmoose88
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,515


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: July 15, 2005, 04:38:03 PM »

Granted it was only by 56 votes, but still why was there such a strong Wilson following there?
New Hampshire was the 2nd most Democratic state in New England after Connecticut from the Civil War onward, with the Democrat candidate usually getting in the 45-50% range but never quite winning.   This was 15-20% ahead of Vermont.

From 1908-1920, NH was the most Democratic state in New England (and almost was in 1924 despite having native son Coolidge running for the Republicans).  Wilson was able to narrowly win in NH, while running close in Maine, Massachusetts, Rhode Island, and Connecticut.  But the relative margin between the states was not atypical.

In 1928, there was big swing to the Democrats in the southern New England states, likely due to the larger percentage of Catholics, and larger recent immigration.  From 1928, until 1968 New Hampshire was more Democratic than Maine or Vermont.

Funny how nowadays that if theres any GOP strength in New England, it first comes from New Hampshire, and then Connecticut (maybe). (Maine follows after that)
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.04 seconds with 11 queries.