NC-Upshot/Siena: Tie (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 26, 2024, 09:47:21 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
  NC-Upshot/Siena: Tie (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: NC-Upshot/Siena: Tie  (Read 6759 times)
TheDeadFlagBlues
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,990
Canada
« on: November 07, 2016, 09:57:25 AM »

As much as I approve of Nate Cohn's valiant attempts to try to build a model based on actual turnout data, rather than polls, this poll exemplifies why that is a flawed project. There's no reason to believe that the early vote shifted to Trump over the past two weeks...
Logged
TheDeadFlagBlues
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,990
Canada
« Reply #1 on: November 07, 2016, 01:24:03 PM »
« Edited: November 07, 2016, 01:26:05 PM by TheDeadFlagBlues »

Nate Cohn's model is a great idea but the wild changes that this poll has had on his early vote estimate suggests that the only way to implement this idea soundly is if the NYT gave him a budget that's ~10 times larger or so. I think this only works if he conducts polls every day or so with the specific intent of garnering a huge sample of early voters that's more stable. We really shouldn't be seeing fluctuations in the early vote that are this huge: these people already voted!

His revised model will probably be much closer to the final result but I'm left feeling like this will be by coincidence rather than the soundness of this whole project.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.02 seconds with 14 queries.