|           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
August 15, 2020, 11:47:50 am
News:
If you are having trouble logging in due to invalid user name / pass:

Consider resetting your account password, as you may have forgotten it over time if using a password manager.

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
  NC-Upshot/Siena: Tie
« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2
Author Topic: NC-Upshot/Siena: Tie  (Read 3825 times)
heatcharger
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,430
Sweden


Political Matrix
E: -1.04, S: -0.24

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: November 07, 2016, 08:03:03 am »

http://mobile.nytimes.com/2016/11/08/upshot/trump-and-clinton-tied-in-final-upshot-poll-of-north-carolina.html?referer=https://t.co/b6K2oygAcz

Clinton 44%
Trump 44%
Logged
Buzz
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 425


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: November 07, 2016, 08:04:58 am »

this is going to be the closest state! Trump barley wins in the end.
Logged
BlueSwan
blueswan
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,793
Denmark


Political Matrix
E: -4.26, S: -7.30

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: November 07, 2016, 08:07:10 am »

Pretty bad. Wasn't their last one Clinton +7?
Logged
Erich Maria Remarque
LittleBigPlanet
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,646
Sweden


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: November 07, 2016, 08:07:45 am »
« Edited: November 07, 2016, 08:21:25 am by Little Big BREXIT »

Told you.


Someone who wants to complain about 538's "stupid" trend lines? Roll Eyes


Pretty bad. Wasn't their last one Clinton +7?

It was. Tightening Smiley

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.
Shy Trumpistas coming home

But not all of them  Smiley
Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.
Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.
Logged
Fusionmunster
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,483


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: November 07, 2016, 08:13:00 am »

This is more in line with reality.
Logged
HillOfANight
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,459
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: November 07, 2016, 08:19:32 am »

I thought it would be tight. The difference between this poll and others was the white margin, and now it's in line with other polls.
Logged
Erich Maria Remarque
LittleBigPlanet
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,646
Sweden


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: November 07, 2016, 08:29:13 am »
« Edited: November 07, 2016, 08:55:09 am by Little Big BREXIT »

Crosstabs from Sienna:

http://files.constantcontact.com/9c83fb30501/5aa2333d-0f5b-49b3-92d6-dfcc5a1c58f6.pdf
http://files.constantcontact.com/9c83fb30501/3603bf1b-a0f6-4234-ba77-34eeadff55d0.pdf


Republican retain control 47%
Democrats take control    45%
Logged
Erich Maria Remarque
LittleBigPlanet
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,646
Sweden


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: November 07, 2016, 09:14:34 am »

Educated white women ----> Trump Smiley






Logged
Arch
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,867
United States


P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: November 07, 2016, 09:34:27 am »


That graph just says White. It doesn't break down by education and gender together. Clinton is, in fact, winning the educated voters.
Logged
Erich Maria Remarque
LittleBigPlanet
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,646
Sweden


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: November 07, 2016, 09:45:05 am »
« Edited: November 07, 2016, 09:46:40 am by Little Big BREXIT »

It was not what I said.

Educated white women --coming home--> Trump

And they are probably are coming from Johnson.
Logged
Arch
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,867
United States


P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: November 07, 2016, 09:46:55 am »

It was not what I said.

Educated white women --coming home--> Trump

... Let me try this again.

Graph says White, which includes White men and White women. Not Educated White women, not Educated White men, not White women, not White men, but ALL White voters.

You CANNOT say that Educated White women are "coming home" to Trump based on that.
Logged
TheDeadFlagBlues
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,882
Mexico


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: November 07, 2016, 09:57:25 am »

As much as I approve of Nate Cohn's valiant attempts to try to build a model based on actual turnout data, rather than polls, this poll exemplifies why that is a flawed project. There's no reason to believe that the early vote shifted to Trump over the past two weeks...
Logged
Erich Maria Remarque
LittleBigPlanet
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,646
Sweden


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: November 07, 2016, 10:08:00 am »

It was not what I said.

Educated white women --coming home--> Trump

... Let me try this again.

Graph says White, which includes White men and White women. Not Educated White women, not Educated White men, not White women, not White men, but ALL White voters.

You CANNOT say that Educated White women are "coming home" to Trump based on that.

So compared to Sept

Trump share grew by
+6 white
+3 black (but blacks are just 22% of voters)
-1  men
+8 women
+2 no college
+8 college or more.

And you still think that could happen without educated women coming home? Yeah, teoretically it could be some weird flows that could explain it like Trump losing among no-col men, but gaining among non-col women and col-men Roll Eyes
Logged
MasterJedi
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,571
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: November 07, 2016, 10:17:18 am »

It was not what I said.

Educated white women --coming home--> Trump

... Let me try this again.

Graph says White, which includes White men and White women. Not Educated White women, not Educated White men, not White women, not White men, but ALL White voters.

You CANNOT say that Educated White women are "coming home" to Trump based on that.

I guess we can put to rest that Sweden and other countries like it have the best education system in the world!
Logged
dspNY
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,574
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: November 07, 2016, 10:34:55 am »

This makes sense in an election where the Democrat wins nationally by 3-5 points
Logged
Gustaf
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,654


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: -0.70

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: November 07, 2016, 10:38:21 am »

It was not what I said.

Educated white women --coming home--> Trump

... Let me try this again.

Graph says White, which includes White men and White women. Not Educated White women, not Educated White men, not White women, not White men, but ALL White voters.

You CANNOT say that Educated White women are "coming home" to Trump based on that.

I guess we can put to rest that Sweden and other countries like it have the best education system in the world!

I can confirm that the Swedish education system is really awful, especially in math and statistics and especially over the last decade or so.
Logged
Cashew
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,156
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: November 07, 2016, 10:56:29 am »
« Edited: November 07, 2016, 12:41:41 pm by Cashew »

this is going to be the closest state! Trump barley wins in the end.
No. GOTV will put her over the top.
Logged
Erich Maria Remarque
LittleBigPlanet
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,646
Sweden


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: November 07, 2016, 11:32:22 am »

I can confirm that the Swedish education system is really awful, especially in math and statistics and especially over the last decade or so.

But we are best at genus science!!!!111

But not just educational system has worsened, dear Gustaf. So did police (no-go-zones), health and elderly care. Thank political correct left Smiley

And what about our liberal court of law? New trend among rapist: they claim they did it while sleeping... and a lot of them were freed by Swedish liberal court. Thank political correct left Smiley

especially over the last decade or so.
I wounder if it has something to do that Sweden switched from labour migration to asyl migration from Arabic and African countries. Especially over the last decade or so Roll Eyes

http://www.migrationsverket.se/download/18.2d998ffc151ac3871599d0d/1462790765011/Beviljade%2Buppeh%C3%A5llstillst%C3%A5nd%2B1980-2015.pdf

No?
Logged
Xing
xingkerui
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,515
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.63, S: -6.13

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: November 07, 2016, 12:21:25 pm »

This is definitely more believable than Clinton +7. I think she wins by 1-3% here.
Logged
Ozymandias
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 470


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #19 on: November 07, 2016, 12:25:58 pm »
« Edited: November 07, 2016, 12:36:36 pm by Ozymandias »

"Mrs. Clinton leads among voters who have already cast their ballot by a nine-point margin, 49 percent to 40 percent. But Mr. Trump leads among those yet to vote by 17 points, 52 percent to 35 percent."

This implies that about 65% of their sample has already voted early.
Logged
Erich Maria Remarque
LittleBigPlanet
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,646
Sweden


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #20 on: November 07, 2016, 12:40:01 pm »

"Mrs. Clinton leads among voters who have already cast their ballot by a nine-point margin, 49 percent to 40 percent. But Mr. Trump leads among those yet to vote by 17 points, 52 percent to 35 percent."

This implies that about 65% of their sample has already voted early.

63% according to crosstabs Tongue
Logged
Speed of Sound
LiberalPA
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,177
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #21 on: November 07, 2016, 01:15:59 pm »

They've updated the model:

Clinton +1.1 is the call.

http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2016/upshot/north-carolina-early-vote-tracker.html
Logged
Erich Maria Remarque
LittleBigPlanet
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,646
Sweden


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #22 on: November 07, 2016, 01:19:49 pm »
« Edited: November 07, 2016, 01:22:13 pm by Erich Maria Remarque »


Now it is look much better. Is it base on two polls, or just latest one?

EDIT: OK, it based on all 3, but the latest poll is sort of basis.
Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Logged
TheDeadFlagBlues
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,882
Mexico


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #23 on: November 07, 2016, 01:24:03 pm »
« Edited: November 07, 2016, 01:26:05 pm by TheDeadFlagBlues »

Nate Cohn's model is a great idea but the wild changes that this poll has had on his early vote estimate suggests that the only way to implement this idea soundly is if the NYT gave him a budget that's ~10 times larger or so. I think this only works if he conducts polls every day or so with the specific intent of garnering a huge sample of early voters that's more stable. We really shouldn't be seeing fluctuations in the early vote that are this huge: these people already voted!

His revised model will probably be much closer to the final result but I'm left feeling like this will be by coincidence rather than the soundness of this whole project.
Logged
Ozymandias
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 470


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #24 on: November 07, 2016, 01:33:20 pm »

"Mrs. Clinton leads among voters who have already cast their ballot by a nine-point margin, 49 percent to 40 percent. But Mr. Trump leads among those yet to vote by 17 points, 52 percent to 35 percent."

This implies that about 65% of their sample has already voted early.

63% according to crosstabs Tongue

I couldn't find the actual poll-- can you post the link to the crosstabs? Thanks.
Logged
Pages: [1] 2  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.11 seconds with 14 queries.