What time will Hillary Clinton concede?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
May 18, 2024, 01:08:56 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Election
  What time will Hillary Clinton concede?
« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2] 3
Author Topic: What time will Hillary Clinton concede?  (Read 4923 times)
GeorgiaModerate
Moderators
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,900


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #25 on: November 06, 2016, 05:18:34 PM »


Good one.

I'm expecting she will "concede" in 2024 after her terms are up.


If she is elected, she will only be serving one term if she survives through it.

Until people like you totally screw up the 2020 nominee and pick either Trump again or someone as worthless as him and she wins again. I have little faith in the party to pick someone who can win (Kaisich, Rubio, etc).

I don't see either of them as particulary strong candidate. Rubio was pretty much a huge dud, while Kasich... when Trump loses, all many Republican voters will remember come 2020 is "Kasich helped Hillary get elected by not backing the nominee."

Both Rubio and Kasich are probably damaged goods in 2020, but I believe that either of them would have defeated Clinton this year.  (Cruz, probably not.)  The point is that the GOP needs to nominate a candidate who doesn't immediately alienate large segments of the electorate.
Logged
Devout Centrist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,133
United States


Political Matrix
E: -99.99, S: -99.99

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #26 on: November 06, 2016, 05:19:09 PM »


Good one.

I'm expecting she will "concede" in 2024 after her terms are up.


If she is elected, she will only be serving one term if she survives through it.

Until people like you totally screw up the 2020 nominee and pick either Trump again or someone as worthless as him and she wins again. I have little faith in the party to pick someone who can win (Kaisich, Rubio, etc).

I don't see either of them as particulary strong candidate. Rubio was pretty much a huge dud, while Kasich... when Trump loses, all many Republican voters will remember come 2020 is "Kasich helped Hillary get elected by not backing the nominee."

Both would have done much better than Trump this year. Kasich would have almost certainly won, not sure about Rubio (but he probably would have won as well).

I supported Kasich, but I will never do so again. He was too moderate to win any states in the primary, who knows how he would have done in the general election. Nominating moderates hasn't gotten the party very far in past years (2008, 2012).
Ladies and Gentlemen, we can make a projection:

Hillary Clinton will win the 2020 Presidential Election.
Logged
°Leprechaun
tmcusa2
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,230
Uruguay


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #27 on: November 06, 2016, 05:21:02 PM »

Perhaps the GOP needs someone like Rubio to win Florida since it is a key swing state. First Rubio has to win the Senate seat so he can complain how much he hates being a Senator.
Logged
Incipimus iterum
1236
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,096
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #28 on: November 06, 2016, 05:22:46 PM »


Good one.

I'm expecting she will "concede" in 2024 after her terms are up.


If she is elected, she will only be serving one term if she survives through it.

Until people like you totally screw up the 2020 nominee and pick either Trump again or someone as worthless as him and she wins again. I have little faith in the party to pick someone who can win (Kaisich, Rubio, etc).

I don't see either of them as particulary strong candidate. Rubio was pretty much a huge dud, while Kasich... when Trump loses, all many Republican voters will remember come 2020 is "Kasich helped Hillary get elected by not backing the nominee."

Both would have done much better than Trump this year. Kasich would have almost certainly won, not sure about Rubio (but he probably would have won as well).

I supported Kasich, but I will never do so again. He was too moderate to win any states in the primary, who knows how he would have done in the general election. Nominating moderates hasn't gotten the party very far in past years (2008, 2012).
You realize the Republicans cannot rely on the white vote to win the general election anymore. They need to moderate there stance on immigration and stop trying to alienate them.
Logged
Senator Spark
Spark498
Atlas Politician
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,727
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.58, S: 0.00

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #29 on: November 06, 2016, 05:23:47 PM »


Good one.

I'm expecting she will "concede" in 2024 after her terms are up.


If she is elected, she will only be serving one term if she survives through it.

Until people like you totally screw up the 2020 nominee and pick either Trump again or someone as worthless as him and she wins again. I have little faith in the party to pick someone who can win (Kaisich, Rubio, etc).

I don't see either of them as particulary strong candidate. Rubio was pretty much a huge dud, while Kasich... when Trump loses, all many Republican voters will remember come 2020 is "Kasich helped Hillary get elected by not backing the nominee."

Both would have done much better than Trump this year. Kasich would have almost certainly won, not sure about Rubio (but he probably would have won as well).

I supported Kasich, but I will never do so again. He was too moderate to win any states in the primary, who knows how he would have done in the general election. Nominating moderates hasn't gotten the party very far in past years (2008, 2012).
You realize the Republicans cannot rely on the white vote to win the general election anymore. They need to Moderate there stance on Immigration and stop trying to alienate them.

I understand that. However, demographics are changing and the GOP should forfeit states like Arizona, Nevada, and Colorado in exchange for the Midwest.
Logged
°Leprechaun
tmcusa2
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,230
Uruguay


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #30 on: November 06, 2016, 05:24:08 PM »


Good one.

I'm expecting she will "concede" in 2024 after her terms are up.


If she is elected, she will only be serving one term if she survives through it.

Until people like you totally screw up the 2020 nominee and pick either Trump again or someone as worthless as him and she wins again. I have little faith in the party to pick someone who can win (Kaisich, Rubio, etc).

I don't see either of them as particulary strong candidate. Rubio was pretty much a huge dud, while Kasich... when Trump loses, all many Republican voters will remember come 2020 is "Kasich helped Hillary get elected by not backing the nominee."

Both would have done much better than Trump this year. Kasich would have almost certainly won, not sure about Rubio (but he probably would have won as well).

I supported Kasich, but I will never do so again. He was too moderate to win any states in the primary, who knows how he would have done in the general election. Nominating moderates hasn't gotten the party very far in past years (2008, 2012).
You could say the same thing about the Dems in 2000 & 2004.
Logged
GeorgiaModerate
Moderators
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,900


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #31 on: November 06, 2016, 05:25:41 PM »


Good one.

I'm expecting she will "concede" in 2024 after her terms are up.


If she is elected, she will only be serving one term if she survives through it.

Until people like you totally screw up the 2020 nominee and pick either Trump again or someone as worthless as him and she wins again. I have little faith in the party to pick someone who can win (Kaisich, Rubio, etc).

I don't see either of them as particulary strong candidate. Rubio was pretty much a huge dud, while Kasich... when Trump loses, all many Republican voters will remember come 2020 is "Kasich helped Hillary get elected by not backing the nominee."

Both would have done much better than Trump this year. Kasich would have almost certainly won, not sure about Rubio (but he probably would have won as well).

I supported Kasich, but I will never do so again. He was too moderate to win any states in the primary, who knows how he would have done in the general election. Nominating moderates hasn't gotten the party very far in past years (2008, 2012).
You realize the Republicans cannot rely on the white vote to win the general election anymore. They need to Moderate there stance on Immigration and stop trying to alienate them.

I understand that. However, demographics are changing and the GOP should forfeit states like Arizona, Nevada, and Colorado in exchange for the Midwest.

With the ongoing population shifts in this country, that's a losing trade in the long term.
Logged
Senator Spark
Spark498
Atlas Politician
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,727
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.58, S: 0.00

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #32 on: November 06, 2016, 05:26:34 PM »


Good one.

I'm expecting she will "concede" in 2024 after her terms are up.


If she is elected, she will only be serving one term if she survives through it.

Until people like you totally screw up the 2020 nominee and pick either Trump again or someone as worthless as him and she wins again. I have little faith in the party to pick someone who can win (Kaisich, Rubio, etc).

I don't see either of them as particulary strong candidate. Rubio was pretty much a huge dud, while Kasich... when Trump loses, all many Republican voters will remember come 2020 is "Kasich helped Hillary get elected by not backing the nominee."

Both would have done much better than Trump this year. Kasich would have almost certainly won, not sure about Rubio (but he probably would have won as well).

I supported Kasich, but I will never do so again. He was too moderate to win any states in the primary, who knows how he would have done in the general election. Nominating moderates hasn't gotten the party very far in past years (2008, 2012).
You realize the Republicans cannot rely on the white vote to win the general election anymore. They need to Moderate there stance on Immigration and stop trying to alienate them.

I understand that. However, demographics are changing and the GOP should forfeit states like Arizona, Nevada, and Colorado in exchange for the Midwest.

With the ongoing population shifts in this country, that's a losing trade in the long term.

Or maybe by making inroads in the Northeast.
Logged
ProudModerate2
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 20,512
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #33 on: November 06, 2016, 05:27:38 PM »

Logged
Incipimus iterum
1236
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,096
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #34 on: November 06, 2016, 05:29:36 PM »


Good one.

I'm expecting she will "concede" in 2024 after her terms are up.


If she is elected, she will only be serving one term if she survives through it.

Until people like you totally screw up the 2020 nominee and pick either Trump again or someone as worthless as him and she wins again. I have little faith in the party to pick someone who can win (Kaisich, Rubio, etc).

I don't see either of them as particulary strong candidate. Rubio was pretty much a huge dud, while Kasich... when Trump loses, all many Republican voters will remember come 2020 is "Kasich helped Hillary get elected by not backing the nominee."

Both would have done much better than Trump this year. Kasich would have almost certainly won, not sure about Rubio (but he probably would have won as well).

I supported Kasich, but I will never do so again. He was too moderate to win any states in the primary, who knows how he would have done in the general election. Nominating moderates hasn't gotten the party very far in past years (2008, 2012).
You realize the Republicans cannot rely on the white vote to win the general election anymore. They need to Moderate there stance on Immigration and stop trying to alienate them.

I understand that. However, demographics are changing and the GOP should forfeit states like Arizona, Nevada, and Colorado in exchange for the Midwest.

With the ongoing population shifts in this country, that's a losing trade in the long term.

Or maybe by making inroads in the Northeast.
Thats not gonna happen how long has it been since a republican won in Pennsylvania, Vermont, New Jersey, and Connecticut, 1988.
Logged
Senator Spark
Spark498
Atlas Politician
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,727
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.58, S: 0.00

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #35 on: November 06, 2016, 05:30:10 PM »


Good one.

I'm expecting she will "concede" in 2024 after her terms are up.


If she is elected, she will only be serving one term if she survives through it.

Until people like you totally screw up the 2020 nominee and pick either Trump again or someone as worthless as him and she wins again. I have little faith in the party to pick someone who can win (Kaisich, Rubio, etc).

I don't see either of them as particulary strong candidate. Rubio was pretty much a huge dud, while Kasich... when Trump loses, all many Republican voters will remember come 2020 is "Kasich helped Hillary get elected by not backing the nominee."

Both would have done much better than Trump this year. Kasich would have almost certainly won, not sure about Rubio (but he probably would have won as well).

I supported Kasich, but I will never do so again. He was too moderate to win any states in the primary, who knows how he would have done in the general election. Nominating moderates hasn't gotten the party very far in past years (2008, 2012).
You realize the Republicans cannot rely on the white vote to win the general election anymore. They need to Moderate there stance on Immigration and stop trying to alienate them.

I understand that. However, demographics are changing and the GOP should forfeit states like Arizona, Nevada, and Colorado in exchange for the Midwest.

With the ongoing population shifts in this country, that's a losing trade in the long term.

Or maybe by making inroads in the Northeast.
Thats not gonna happen how long has it been since a republican won in Pennsylvania, Vermont, Connecticut, 1988.

In the future it can happen again.
Logged
QE
Rookie
**
Posts: 64
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #36 on: November 06, 2016, 05:31:43 PM »

Logged
Incipimus iterum
1236
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,096
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #37 on: November 06, 2016, 05:32:08 PM »


Good one.

I'm expecting she will "concede" in 2024 after her terms are up.


If she is elected, she will only be serving one term if she survives through it.

Until people like you totally screw up the 2020 nominee and pick either Trump again or someone as worthless as him and she wins again. I have little faith in the party to pick someone who can win (Kaisich, Rubio, etc).

I don't see either of them as particulary strong candidate. Rubio was pretty much a huge dud, while Kasich... when Trump loses, all many Republican voters will remember come 2020 is "Kasich helped Hillary get elected by not backing the nominee."

Both would have done much better than Trump this year. Kasich would have almost certainly won, not sure about Rubio (but he probably would have won as well).

I supported Kasich, but I will never do so again. He was too moderate to win any states in the primary, who knows how he would have done in the general election. Nominating moderates hasn't gotten the party very far in past years (2008, 2012).
You realize the Republicans cannot rely on the white vote to win the general election anymore. They need to Moderate there stance on Immigration and stop trying to alienate them.

I understand that. However, demographics are changing and the GOP should forfeit states like Arizona, Nevada, and Colorado in exchange for the Midwest.

With the ongoing population shifts in this country, that's a losing trade in the long term.

Or maybe by making inroads in the Northeast.
Thats not gonna happen how long has it been since a republican won in Pennsylvania, Vermont, Connecticut, 1988.

In the future it can happen again.
Yeah when the Republicans become more Liberal on social issues, which is not gonna happen.
Logged
Green Line
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,595
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #38 on: November 06, 2016, 05:32:19 PM »

10:20 pm eastern time November 3, 2020 as it is announced that she has lost the election to President-elect FLAWLESS, BEAUTIFUL MARCO!
Logged
Yank2133
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,387


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #39 on: November 06, 2016, 05:32:33 PM »

Logged
Pragmatic Conservative
1184AZ
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,735


Political Matrix
E: 3.00, S: -0.41

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #40 on: November 06, 2016, 05:32:45 PM »

11:30PM on November 3rd 2020, after the networks call NH for Marco Rubio, placing him above 270 EV.  
Logged
Foucaulf
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,050
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #41 on: November 06, 2016, 05:33:49 PM »

I tried to tell you what was going on.  I really tried.  This looks like a landslide, folks.
Logged
PresidentSamTilden
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 507


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #42 on: November 06, 2016, 05:39:38 PM »

11:30PM on November 3rd 2020, after the networks call NH for Marco Rubio, placing him above 270 EV.  

A climate denier isn't gonna win in 2020...maybe if he changes his position
Logged
‼realJohnEwards‼
MatteKudasai
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,867
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -4.87

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #43 on: November 06, 2016, 05:40:59 PM »

January 18th, 2025, when she gives her farewell address.
Logged
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,840
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #44 on: November 06, 2016, 05:41:39 PM »

11:30PM on November 3rd 2020, after the networks call NH for Marco Rubio, placing him above 270 EV.  

A climate denier isn't gonna win in 2020...maybe if he changes his position

Americans don't vote based on issues.
Logged
Devout Centrist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,133
United States


Political Matrix
E: -99.99, S: -99.99

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #45 on: November 06, 2016, 05:43:11 PM »

10:20 pm eastern time November 3, 2020 as it is announced that she has lost the election to President-elect FLAWLESS, BEAUTIFUL MARCO!
Nothing's in the bag, just remember that.
Logged
PresidentSamTilden
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 507


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #46 on: November 06, 2016, 05:44:52 PM »

Americans don't vote based on issues.

Lol, there is truth to that. Every once in a while we do though (1860, 1932). I think the problem will be serious enough by then that denialism will be disqualifying. We'll see
Logged
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,840
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #47 on: November 06, 2016, 05:47:58 PM »

Americans don't vote based on issues.

Lol, there is truth to that. Every once in a while we do though (1860, 1932). I think the problem will be serious enough by then that denialism will be disqualifying. We'll see

I'm pretty sure Reince Priebus and Donald Trump could personally slaughter the family of every Republican in the country, and 90%+ of them would continue to dutifully vote straight ticket R in every election afterward. "The Demoncrats are worse! They probably would've killed me too!"
Logged
Ljube
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,067
Political Matrix
E: 2.71, S: -6.09

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #48 on: November 06, 2016, 05:48:09 PM »


Both Rubio and Kasich are probably damaged goods in 2020, but I believe that either of them would have defeated Clinton this year.  (Cruz, probably not.)  The point is that the GOP needs to nominate a candidate who doesn't immediately alienate large segments of the electorate.

And who might that be? Any suggestions?
Logged
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,840
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #49 on: November 06, 2016, 05:49:03 PM »


Both Rubio and Kasich are probably damaged goods in 2020, but I believe that either of them would have defeated Clinton this year.  (Cruz, probably not.)  The point is that the GOP needs to nominate a candidate who doesn't immediately alienate large segments of the electorate.

And who might that be? Any suggestions?

Kasich or Sandoval would've thumped Hillary.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2] 3  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.072 seconds with 12 queries.