CBS/YouGov: Clinton +3 (FL), Trump +3 (TX) (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 29, 2024, 05:27:45 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
  CBS/YouGov: Clinton +3 (FL), Trump +3 (TX) (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: CBS/YouGov: Clinton +3 (FL), Trump +3 (TX)  (Read 5385 times)
NOVA Green
Oregon Progressive
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,454
United States


« on: October 23, 2016, 04:29:51 PM »

The polling is pretty clear in both of these states.

I think Trump hangs on in Texas but the margin should be embarrassing.

I'll agree with this...

I'm still really curious what the final distribution of the vote is in Texas, if it ends up only going Republican by 3-5% in November.

Assuming that much of the swings are happening among Latino, that live in large numbers in most parts of Texas, excepting EastTex and parts of the plain areas of NorthTex that county swing map should be relatively even in most parts of the state, excepting perhaps SouthTex along the Rio Grande counties and El Paso that are already overwhelmingly Democratic.

I would expect to see major swings in Harris County and other places with a large population of Middle and Upper-Middle Class Republican leaning Latino voters (Bexar County?)

The other unknown is college educated Anglo voters that is the next most likely cause for the dramatic shift in Texas between 2012 results and the 2016 recent Texas polling. This vote will likely be  heavily concentrated in suburban counties/areas around Houston, DFW, SA/Austin, and maybe some miscellaneous college towns scattered around the state.

Question #2 Likelihood of Voting
96% of Latinos, 95% of Blacks, and only 93% of Anglos say that have already voted or definitely will vote.

Q #4: Intended voting method
Again Latinos lead the pack in terms of early voting with 69% of Latinos, 66% of Blacks, and only 62% of Anglos saying they will vote early.

Q #6: Motivation to Vote
Latinos again lead with 85% very/somewhat motivated to vote versus only 82% of Anglos.

We could go further through the list by ethnicity, but it does seem clear that there is strong motivation and enthusiasm to vote among Texas Latinos, and it does not bode well for Mr Trump in Tejas, or as he is more frequently referred to in Spanish El Payaso, and that's the nicer term.
Logged
NOVA Green
Oregon Progressive
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,454
United States


« Reply #1 on: October 24, 2016, 05:24:24 PM »

Clinton +3% in FL may be accurate, but there is ZERO CHANCE she is within 3% in TX.
North and central TX will vote the same as in 2012.
The state Romney carried by 1.26 mil. votes and 15.8%.

Obama lost Texas by only 950k votes in 2008 and only won Harris County by 20k votes.

Even if Harris only goes +10 C in 2016 and turnout is only 1.2 Mill voters, Clinton would net +200k votes alone from this one county.

Needless to say if turnout is higher in Harris and it ends up more like a +15 % C, you already have over 30% of Romney's margins wiped out in one single county, without even going in the suburban counties of Houston, DFW, SA, and Austin.

I don't know how you define NorthTex and Central TX, but I am 100% positive that Clinton will significantly out-perform Obama '08 margins in the Metro SA and Austin areas "Central Texas".
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.025 seconds with 13 queries.