Your 2016 presidential ballot under STV

[Since I'm the mad scientist proclaimed by myself]

1: Clinton
2: McMullen
3: Johnson
4: Stein
5: Castle
6: Trump

[You don't see any blue avatars now]

1. Clinton
2. Johnson
3. McMuffin
4. Stein
5. Trump
6. Castle

[Lexii, harbinger of chaos and sexual anarchy]

1. Stein
2. Johnson
3. Clinton
4. Castle
5. McMullin
6. Trump

[rpryor03]

1. Johnson
2. McMuffin
3. Clinton
4. None of these Candidates

[RI]

1. Maturen
2. McMullin
3. Trump
4. Castle
5. Stein
6. Johnson
7. Clinton

[Representative simossad]

1. Clinton
2. Johnson
3. McMuffin
4. Stein
5. Trump
6. Castle

[Phony Moderate]

Imagining that a. voting is compulsory and b. votes only count if you give all candidates a preference (i.e. like Australia)...

1. Johnson
2. Stein
3. Clinton
4. Castle
5. McMullin
6. Trump

[DavidB.]

1. McMullin
2. Clinton
3. Johnson
4. Castle
5. Trump
6. Stein

[windjammer]

1) Clinton
2) None of the above

[RFayette 🇻🇦]

1. Castle
2. Trump
3. McMullin
4. Johnson
5. Clinton
6. Stein

[100% pro-life no matter what]

Strategically (trying to stop a Clinton presidency at all costs):
Trump
McMullin
Castle
Johnson
Stein
Clinton

Real order of preference:
McMullin
Castle
Trump
Johnson
Clinton
Stein

[DavidB.]

1. Castle
2. Trump
3. McMullin
4. Johnson
5. Clinton
6. Stein

Why Trump over McMullin?

[Torie]

1. Clinton
2. McMullin
3. Johnson
4. Castle (who's he?)
5. Trump
6. Stein

[OSR stands with Israel]

1.McMullin
2. Johnson
3. Clinton
4. Castle ( don't know he is but he can't get worse then the bottom 2)
5. Trump
6. Stein  


Though if i lived in a swing state( except Utah )

1. Clinton
2. McMullin
3. Johnson
4-6: same as above

[sparkey]

1. Johnson
2. McMullin (qualified write-in in CA)
3. De La Fuente (qualified write-in in CA)
4. Castle (qualified write-in in CA)
5. Stein
6. Trump
7. Clinton
8. La Riva

Official qualified write-ins aren't finalized in CA yet so I might stick in a few more above Trump and Clinton if the ones that turn up on that list aren't terrible.

[RFayette 🇻🇦]

1. Castle
2. Trump
3. McMullin
4. Johnson
5. Clinton
6. Stein

Why Trump over McMullin?

McMullin is a neo-con and one of the architects of Bush's foreign policy, and I'm definitely not a fan of that.  I will say that McMullin has better character than Trump, so perhaps I'd invert those two, but I am very confident with Castle as #1.

[Attorney General & PPT Dwarven Dragon]

1. Johnson
2. Clinton
3. McMullin
4. Rocky De La Fuente

[Clark Kent]

1. McMullin
2. Johnson

[HisGrace]

1. Johnson
2. Clinton
3. McMullin
4. Castle
5. Stein
6. Trump

[Orthogonian Society Treasurer]

1. Donald J. Trump
2. Darrell Castle
3. Gary Johnson
4. Jill Stein
5. Evan McMullin
6. Hillary Clinton

[Kingpoleon]

1. Johnson
2. McMullin
3. De La Fuente
4. Exhausted Ballot

[evergreenarbor]

Of the candidates who are on the ballot in Washington:

1. Clinton
2. La Riva (Socialism and Liberation)
3. Kennedy (Socialist Workers)
4. Johnson
5. Stein
(6. None of these candidates)
7. Castle
8. Trump

[This user has not been convicted of 34 felonies]

1. Clinton
2. Johnson
3. Stein
4. McMuffin

[VPH]

1. Clinton (Democratic)
2. Maturen (American Solidarity Party)
3. De La Fuente (Reform Party)

[mencken]

1. Johnson
2. McMullin (qualified write-in in CA)
3. De La Fuente (qualified write-in in CA)
4. Castle (qualified write-in in CA)
5. Stein
6. Trump
7. Clinton
8. La Riva

Official qualified write-ins aren't finalized in CA yet so I might stick in a few more above Trump and Clinton if the ones that turn up on that list aren't terrible.

I don't think Castle is actually qualified in California; he has far fewer electors than the 55 required.


1. Castle
2. Trump
3. Johnson
4. Stein
5. De La Fuente
6. McMullin
7. Any combination of syllables not involving "Obama" or "Clinton"
8. Clinton