Grade the job Chris Wallace did as moderator.

[Bismarck]

Excellent job. Nice to have a moderator who doesn't show which candidate he supports for once. Asked tough questions to both, stayed calm, kept things on track.

[Fusionmunster]

He did great, not perfect but much better than the last 3.

[emailking]

A. He did a great job.

[Young Conservative]

A ++ Best moderator by far

[Hammy]

Best out of all the moderators.

[Fitzgerald]

To my astonishment, easily the best of the season. Mind you, I would have appreciated it if he had asserted a bit more grip over his two charges, but he at least kept the audience under control. For the first time in my life, I'll give him an A.

[Virginiá]

Superb job. I was a bit wary going into it, but I think he was a fine moderator.

[Fuzzy Bear]

Best out of all the moderators.

Yes, and by a lot.

I would certainly love to do away for good with the "Town Hall" formats, btw.

[john cage bubblegum]

Best moderator of the debate season.  There were was a couple times where I thought he let Trump run him over, but overall he did a good job keeping the audience in line and keeping order to the debate format.  And he asked equally tough questions to the candidates.

A-

[ApatheticAustrian]

wild theory:

if a real mod like wallace asked about specifics it was impossible for trump to win since he only knows talking points.

[dspNY]

He did surprisingly well. By challenging Clinton, he actually made her look better

[Nyvin]

Really good actually,  I was impressed.  A

I would certainly love to do away for good with the "Town Hall" formats, btw.

OMG Yes!   Those were some of the dumbest questions I've ever heard!!

[‼realJohnEwards‼]

He did surprisingly well. By challenging Clinton, he actually made her look better

I agree. By actually digging more into each candidate (though still not quite as much as I would have liked), he made clear which one could actually lay claim to substance on policy, and which one was a fake orange clown.

[Santander]

He was professional and did what he needed to do. A.

[PresidentSamTilden]

Pretty good overall, kept it more focused and civil than others. But the end questions were like 1960's era republican questions that I don't care much about. Would have greatly preferred questions on Climate Change, wealth inequality, something more relevant to young voters and the future.

Grade: B

[Holmes]

He was quite good. My ranking is

Raddatz > Wallace > Cooper > Holt > Quijano

[MIKESOWELL]

He was superb. His dad Mike would have been proud of him.

[100% pro-life no matter what]

A+

He did everything you want a moderator to do- ask tough questions of both sides, keep it structured, but flexible, allow the candidates to debate, and not fact-check either candidate.

[Cruzcrew]

Chris Wallace is very underrated honestly and was the most objective moderator I saw.

[Catholics vs. Convicts]

Best moderator of the debate season.  There were was a couple times where I thought he let Trump run him over, but overall he did a good job keeping the audience in line and keeping order to the debate format.  And he asked equally tough questions to the candidates.

A-

[Koharu]

B+  To get an A, I would have liked him to actually have stopped all their bickering over each other, but by the end he was tired and I don't blame him. Love that he chewed out the audience multiple times and was polite while smacking Trump for interrupting.

[Dumbo]

A.
CNN should buy him to replace Wolf Blitzer.

[PresidentTRUMP]

A - best moderator of the three debates easily, finally we got some real discussion on the issues! Thank You!

[Blackacre]

He was quite good. My ranking is

Raddatz > Wallace > Cooper > Holt > Quijano

[Monolith]

Fox has been fairly neutral this election considering their hesitation to support Trump. You can see some of that in the way Wallace moderated.