Marquette Law Wisconsin: Feingold +2
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 27, 2024, 07:55:14 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 Senatorial Election Polls
  Marquette Law Wisconsin: Feingold +2
« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2
Author Topic: Marquette Law Wisconsin: Feingold +2  (Read 1514 times)
Classic Conservative
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,628


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: October 12, 2016, 12:27:07 PM »

Feingold: 46%
Johnson: 44%
Anderson: 4%

https://mobile.twitter.com/MULawPoll/status/786256376905412608
Logged
Attorney General, Senator-Elect, & Former PPT Dwarven Dragon
Dwarven Dragon
Atlas Politician
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,719
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.42, S: -0.52

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: October 12, 2016, 12:27:55 PM »

Strong Lean D ----> Lean D

If Feingold loses, the R senate majority is Safe.
Logged
Gass3268
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,532
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: October 12, 2016, 12:30:16 PM »

If Clinton is up 7, this is still Safe D.
Logged
Attorney General, Senator-Elect, & Former PPT Dwarven Dragon
Dwarven Dragon
Atlas Politician
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,719
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.42, S: -0.52

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: October 12, 2016, 12:31:45 PM »


Classic Atlas. If you don't think Feingold's team looks at this poll and screams in fear, you're beyond delusional.
Logged
100% pro-life no matter what
ExtremeRepublican
Moderators
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,726


Political Matrix
E: 7.35, S: 5.57


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: October 12, 2016, 12:33:49 PM »

I was just waiting for one more poll to confirm it, but this race is a tossup!
Logged
Gass3268
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,532
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: October 12, 2016, 12:39:30 PM »


Classic Atlas. If you don't think Feingold's team looks at this poll and screams in fear, you're beyond delusional.

If Clinton is up 7, it will not matter, you can take that to the bank.
Logged
KingSweden
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,227
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: October 12, 2016, 12:42:05 PM »

A curious result. Behavior from national parties and PACs would suggest this race is not this close
Logged
Gass3268
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,532
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: October 12, 2016, 12:42:42 PM »

A curious result. Behavior from national parties and PACs would suggest this race is not this close

Exactly
Logged
Attorney General, Senator-Elect, & Former PPT Dwarven Dragon
Dwarven Dragon
Atlas Politician
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,719
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.42, S: -0.52

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: October 12, 2016, 12:45:51 PM »

I guess it's just different definitions of Safe D. My definition of Safe D is that there is a literally 0% chance of the race going R barring divine intervention, even if there's a sudden big shift in the electoral climate.
Logged
Figueira
84285
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,175


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: October 12, 2016, 12:46:56 PM »

A little concerning, but Feingold should win in the end.
Logged
Chancellor Tanterterg
Mr. X
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,341
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: October 12, 2016, 12:51:55 PM »

A little concerning, but Feingold should win in the end.
Logged
Gass3268
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,532
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: October 12, 2016, 12:55:36 PM »
« Edited: October 12, 2016, 01:02:01 PM by Assemblyman Gass3268 »

I guess it's just different definitions of Safe D. My definition of Safe D is that there is a literally 0% chance of the race going R barring divine intervention, even if there's a sudden big shift in the electoral climate.

Ok, then let's call it Likely D. There are just not enough vote splitters in Wisconsin.

Also if you look at the early vote right now, there have been big % increases in Dane and Milwaukee county compared to this time in 2012. You are not seeing the same numbers in the Republican counties.
Logged
Xing
xingkerui
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,307
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.52, S: -3.91

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: October 12, 2016, 01:03:28 PM »

Marquette has had better results for Johnson recently, so this isn't a huge swing in his favor. Unless this suddenly starts looking like a good year for Republicans again, and they start spending on this race, I'm not buying it being this close.
Logged
Skye
yeah_93
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,581
Venezuela


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: October 12, 2016, 01:19:07 PM »

The hell happened here?
Logged
Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.
Nathan
Moderators
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 34,427


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: October 12, 2016, 01:32:21 PM »

A curious result. Behavior from national parties and PACs would suggest this race is not this close

Exactly

And yet you dont apply the same logic to the FL race. Anyway, this is a Lean D race, but nothing would be more satisfying than seeing Atlas Democrats react to a Ron Johnson win, lol.

I, at least, am perfectly willing to say the same about Florida.
Logged
windjammer
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,515
France


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: October 12, 2016, 01:35:21 PM »

A curious result. Behavior from national parties and PACs would suggest this race is not this close

Exactly

And yet you dont apply the same logic to the FL race. Anyway, this is a Lean D race, but nothing would be more satisfying than seeing Atlas Democrats react to a Ron Johnson win, lol.

I, at least, am perfectly willing to say the same about Florida.

Is it really needed to say things like that "I can't wait for seeing supporters of X when their candidate will lose"?

Logged
Gass3268
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,532
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: October 12, 2016, 01:37:09 PM »

A curious result. Behavior from national parties and PACs would suggest this race is not this close

Exactly

And yet you dont apply the same logic to the FL race. Anyway, this is a Lean D race, but nothing would be more satisfying than seeing Atlas Democrats react to a Ron Johnson win, lol.

I have yet to say anything about Florida regarding this to the best of my knowledge. All I know is that Clinton attacked Rubio hard yesterday in her event in Miami for defending Trump.
Logged
Vosem
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,637
United States


Political Matrix
E: 8.13, S: -6.09

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: October 12, 2016, 01:39:09 PM »

A curious result. Behavior from national parties and PACs would suggest this race is not this close

Exactly

And yet you dont apply the same logic to the FL race. Anyway, this is a Lean D race, but nothing would be more satisfying than seeing Atlas Democrats react to a Ron Johnson win, lol.

I have yet to say anything about Florida regarding this to the best of my knowledge. All I know is that Clinton attacked Rubio hard yesterday in her event in Miami for defending Trump.

I mean, at the Hillary rally I went to here in Ohio she spent a chunk of the speech talking up Ted Strickland. Doesn't mean he's not doomed.
Logged
Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.
Nathan
Moderators
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 34,427


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: October 12, 2016, 01:42:35 PM »

A curious result. Behavior from national parties and PACs would suggest this race is not this close

Exactly

And yet you dont apply the same logic to the FL race. Anyway, this is a Lean D race, but nothing would be more satisfying than seeing Atlas Democrats react to a Ron Johnson win, lol.

I, at least, am perfectly willing to say the same about Florida.

Is it really needed to say things like that "I can't wait for seeing supporters of X when their candidate will lose"?



I meant that I'm willing to apply the same logic ('party behavior suggests this race isn't this close') to the Florida race, not that I want to see Rubio supporters' tears. Sorry.
Logged
JMT
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,115


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #19 on: October 12, 2016, 01:45:36 PM »

Polls have shown this race is tightening (for reasons I can't even think of, to be honest). I still expect Feingold to win, but damn this was not a race I expected to have to worry about in the slightest. That is scary. I wonder if the DSCC will go back into this race to pull Feingold across the finish line?
Logged
windjammer
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,515
France


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #20 on: October 12, 2016, 01:51:07 PM »

A curious result. Behavior from national parties and PACs would suggest this race is not this close

Exactly

And yet you dont apply the same logic to the FL race. Anyway, this is a Lean D race, but nothing would be more satisfying than seeing Atlas Democrats react to a Ron Johnson win, lol.

I, at least, am perfectly willing to say the same about Florida.

Is it really needed to say things like that "I can't wait for seeing supporters of X when their candidate will lose"?



I meant that I'm willing to apply the same logic ('party behavior suggests this race isn't this close') to the Florida race, not that I want to see Rubio supporters' tears. Sorry.
My apologies for having misunderstood you.
Logged
Attorney General, Senator-Elect, & Former PPT Dwarven Dragon
Dwarven Dragon
Atlas Politician
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,719
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.42, S: -0.52

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #21 on: October 12, 2016, 04:26:14 PM »

The reason why I don't consider party actions reason enough to have this Likely D is this is the state's gold standard poll. If they say the race is close, it's close. Also we have another poll showing Johnson ahead. No one has found Murphy to be ahead.
Logged
Young Conservative
youngconservative
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,029
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #22 on: October 12, 2016, 06:17:50 PM »

A curious result. Behavior from national parties and PACs would suggest this race is not this close

Exactly
That happened before all these polls came out. I suspect more money to be poured in soon.
Logged
Young Conservative
youngconservative
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,029
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #23 on: October 12, 2016, 06:18:59 PM »

Polls have shown this race is tightening (for reasons I can't even think of, to be honest). I still expect Feingold to win, but damn this was not a race I expected to have to worry about in the slightest. That is scary. I wonder if the DSCC will go back into this race to pull Feingold across the finish line?
Feingold has baggage and scandals. Johnson doesn't have any scandals other than quirkiness. Johnson also runs a great campaign with powerful ads.
Logged
morgieb
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,637
Australia


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -8.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #24 on: October 12, 2016, 06:20:03 PM »

Bizarre turn of events. It's not like Hillary's dragging Feingold down either. Anyone know WTF is going on?
Logged
Pages: [1] 2  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.073 seconds with 12 queries.