538: Here's how the election would look if only one gender voted
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 01, 2024, 11:29:07 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Election
  538: Here's how the election would look if only one gender voted
« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2]
Author Topic: 538: Here's how the election would look if only one gender voted  (Read 3655 times)
angus
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,424
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #25 on: October 11, 2016, 08:45:45 PM »

"Whom" is mostly going the way of "thee" and "thou".

exactly, as is good governance, and for the same reasons.
Logged
Sprouts Farmers Market ✘
Sprouts
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,794
Italy


Political Matrix
E: -4.90, S: 1.74

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #26 on: October 11, 2016, 09:13:41 PM »


He's absolutely wrong, most of those states are pathetic in every statistic, and vile culturally.

Alabama and Wyoming are 2 of the top 5 or 6 states in the country, but yeah the rest are pretty dire
Logged
OSR stands with Israel
Computer89
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 45,317


Political Matrix
E: 3.42, S: 2.61

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #27 on: October 11, 2016, 09:31:37 PM »

The red states in the first map are literally the best states in America.

worst as they are not that business friendly and too rural
Logged
Young Conservative
youngconservative
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,031
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #28 on: October 11, 2016, 09:34:16 PM »


He's absolutely wrong, most of those states are pathetic in every statistic, and vile culturally.
I think you're statements quantify as bigotry.
Logged
Mr. Morden
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,066
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #29 on: October 11, 2016, 10:10:35 PM »

Similarly, a YouGov poll last week found that there is a gap between who married men think their wives will vote for, and how married women plan to vote:



Shy Hillary voters? Discuss.

How is that a shy Clinton effect?  A "Shy X" effect is when people are reluctant to tell pollsters their true voting intentions.  Here they are telling the pollsters their voting intentions.  They're just not telling their husbands.


Presumably some people are answering polls in front of their family members, so there will be some women who don't tell pollsters their true intentions because they don't want their husbands to hear.

However, the opposite effect might still exist, and in some cases it could simply be couples not talking about politics with each other.

So you're saying that the fact that there's a gap between what married women say their voting intentions are and what their husbands think suggests that the gap is even bigger, because there might be additional women who are lying to pollsters, who actually support Clinton?

I don't think there's any way to tell if that's the sense in which there's lying going on.  For all we know, the husbands are the ones telling pollsters the truth about their wives' voting intentions, and the discrepancy occurs because some Trump-supporting women don't want to tell pollsters that they support Trump.  So this could just as easily indicate a "Shy Trump" effect as a "Shy Clinton" effect.  How can we possibly know which way these effects are running from the data at hand?
Logged
Figueira
84285
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,173


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #30 on: October 11, 2016, 10:33:19 PM »

For the record, I love Kentucky, Louisiana, and Utah.

Similarly, a YouGov poll last week found that there is a gap between who married men think their wives will vote for, and how married women plan to vote:



Shy Hillary voters? Discuss.

How is that a shy Clinton effect?  A "Shy X" effect is when people are reluctant to tell pollsters their true voting intentions.  Here they are telling the pollsters their voting intentions.  They're just not telling their husbands.


Presumably some people are answering polls in front of their family members, so there will be some women who don't tell pollsters their true intentions because they don't want their husbands to hear.

However, the opposite effect might still exist, and in some cases it could simply be couples not talking about politics with each other.

So you're saying that the fact that there's a gap between what married women say their voting intentions are and what their husbands think suggests that the gap is even bigger, because there might be additional women who are lying to pollsters, who actually support Clinton?

I don't think there's any way to tell if that's the sense in which there's lying going on.  For all we know, the husbands are the ones telling pollsters the truth about their wives' voting intentions, and the discrepancy occurs because some Trump-supporting women don't want to tell pollsters that they support Trump.  So this could just as easily indicate a "Shy Trump" effect as a "Shy Clinton" effect.  How can we possibly know which way these effects are running from the data at hand?


Like I said, it also depends on whether it's a case of women being afraid of openly disagreeing with their domineering sexist husbands, or simply men assuming that their wives agree with them even though they don't.

Either way, we clearly don't have enough information to know.
Logged
Kalimantan
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 841
Indonesia


Political Matrix
E: -3.10, S: -1.74

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #31 on: October 12, 2016, 05:11:23 AM »

The first map is plausibly the actual map, or close to it, which suggests the level of Trump's collapse amongst women may drown out the gap in the male vote
Logged
Likely Voter
Moderators
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,344


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #32 on: October 12, 2016, 02:58:35 PM »

Via Guardian
Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.
Logged
Kingpoleon
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,144
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #33 on: October 12, 2016, 04:03:09 PM »

Similarly, a YouGov poll last week found that there is a gap between who married men think their wives will vote for, and how married women plan to vote:



Shy Hillary voters? Discuss.
Women and men had gaps there. Oops.
Logged
Blackacre
Spenstar3D
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,172
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.35, S: -7.22

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #34 on: October 12, 2016, 04:12:44 PM »

The Atlas-red states in the second map are literally the best states in America.

Fix'd for you Wink
Logged
Hydera
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,545


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #35 on: October 12, 2016, 04:41:21 PM »

The red states in the first map are literally the best states in America.

I can see you were typing that without a straight face.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.044 seconds with 13 queries.