National - Rasmussen: Trump +5 (4-way)

[Seriously?]

Rasmussen 9/20-21 (Change 9/13-14) Trump +5
Trump 44% (+2%)
Clinton 39% (-1%)
Johnson 8% (+1)
Stein 2% (--)
Other 3% (+1%)
Undecided 5% (-2%)

1,000 LV; September 20-21, 2016; MOE +/- 3%

Link: http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/elections/election_2016/white_house_watch_sep22

[Gass3268]

Rassy gonna Rass

[Horus]

Lol

[afleitch]

Rassy gonna Rass

Shame. They were getting a little better.

[Fusionmunster]

How is Rasmussen so consistently off base?

[Dr. Arch]

There goes the gear on the average again.

[Fmr President & Senator Polnut]

Oh, Rassy is back!!!

[Sir Mohamed]

And then… then you see it’s Rassy.

[dspNY]

I think Scotty Raz just wanted to mess with Nate Silver's models a bit. Junk poll

[bilaps]

After this primary season I would be very careful in discounting the polls because they are not in accordance with others.

[Fusionmunster]

After this primary season I would be very careful in discounting the polls because they are not in accordance with others.

We're discounting them because they did such a piss poor job in 2012.

[bilaps]

After this primary season I would be very careful in discounting the polls because they are not in accordance with others.

We're discounting them because they did such a piss poor job in 2012.

So if you personaly do some bad thing in your life, you will not try to improve on that the next time you do the same thing?

[JerryArkansas]

After this primary season I would be very careful in discounting the polls because they are not in accordance with others.

We're discounting them because they did such a piss poor job in 2012.

So if you personaly do some bad thing in your life, you will not try to improve on that the next time you do the same thing?

When you provide polls to a certain group of people, no you won't.

[Fusionmunster]

After this primary season I would be very careful in discounting the polls because they are not in accordance with others.

We're discounting them because they did such a piss poor job in 2012.

So if you personaly do some bad thing in your life, you will not try to improve on that the next time you do the same thing?

This is a pollster, not a person. Fact: NBC > Rasmussen weekly tracker.

Edit: And we cant tell if they've improved because their polls are behind paywalls.

[Fmr President & Senator Polnut]

After this primary season I would be very careful in discounting the polls because they are not in accordance with others.

We're discounting them because they did such a piss poor job in 2012.

So if you personaly do some bad thing in your life, you will not try to improve on that the next time you do the same thing?

Are you new to this? This is Rasmussen, they're awful until proven otherwise and we have cause.

[bilaps]

I'm just saying I would be careful with discounting any poll because you don't like results.

[JerryArkansas]

I'm just saying I would be careful with discounting any poll because you don't like results.

We've been calling them sh**t for the past 5 months. So don't worry about that.

[Fmr President & Senator Polnut]

I'm just saying I would be careful with discounting any poll because you don't like results.

We've been calling them sh**t for the past 5 months. So don't worry about that.

5 years, not months.

[RJEvans]

Anyone have access to the crosstabs?

[Fusionmunster]

Anyone have access to the crosstabs?

I dont think anyone in their right mind would be willing to pay for Rasmussen crosstabs.

[Starbucks Union Thug HokeyPuck]

Scotty Boy has HEELED to the Tangerine Tornado.  SAD!!!

[‼realJohnEwards‼]

I feel like polling companies are intentionally confusing us to make the debate more exciting

[Comrade Funk]

Clinton hacks finally got it right. Although kind of easy with this being a Rasmussen poll lol

Junk poll

[Seriously?]

I think Scotty Raz just wanted to mess with Nate Silver's models a bit. Junk poll

That meme would work if Rasmussen still owned and was involved with the company. But he isn't anymore.

[Xing]

This poll is junk, but clearly their NV poll was 100% trustworthy, like all NV polls are.