OH-Bloomberg: Trump +5/+5 (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 27, 2024, 07:17:05 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
  OH-Bloomberg: Trump +5/+5 (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: OH-Bloomberg: Trump +5/+5  (Read 5003 times)
JerryArkansas
jerryarkansas
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,535
United States


« on: September 14, 2016, 05:59:24 AM »
Ok, love the 43R to 36D breakdown in party id numbers in the poll.  Really makes it seem valid.
Logged
JerryArkansas
jerryarkansas
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,535
United States


« Reply #1 on: September 14, 2016, 06:03:33 AM »
Quote from: LittleBigOctopus on September 14, 2016, 06:01:53 AM
Quote from: JerryArkansas on September 14, 2016, 05:59:24 AM
Ok, love the 43R to 36D breakdown in party id numbers in the poll.  Really makes it seem valid.
This junk is needed to be unskewed!
No unskewing, just a critique on the poll.
Logged
JerryArkansas
jerryarkansas
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,535
United States


« Reply #2 on: September 14, 2016, 06:29:44 AM »
Quote from: LittleBigOctopus on September 14, 2016, 06:26:20 AM
Quote from: JerryArkansas on September 14, 2016, 06:03:33 AM
Quote from: LittleBigOctopus on September 14, 2016, 06:01:53 AM
Quote from: JerryArkansas on September 14, 2016, 05:59:24 AM
Ok, love the 43R to 36D breakdown in party id numbers in the poll.  Really makes it seem valid.
This junk is needed to be unskewed!
No unskewing, just a critique on the poll.
It is. You are Shy Unskewer Smiley

You didn't criticise methodology (controlled by pollster), you criticized the results ("controlled" by voters).
When people switch between candidate, they likely switch their selfreported party identification as well. It is not strange at all. It'd be strange, if they didn't.

But yeah, the natural noise in this poll is probably Trump-friendly.
I was critiquing what method they are using for the LV screen.  But again keep posting the sh**t that you spew all each and every day.  It really makes you look great.
Logged
JerryArkansas
jerryarkansas
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,535
United States


« Reply #3 on: September 14, 2016, 06:37:12 AM »
Quote from: LittleBigOctopus on September 14, 2016, 06:33:58 AM
Quote from: JerryArkansas on September 14, 2016, 06:29:44 AM
Quote from: LittleBigOctopus on September 14, 2016, 06:26:20 AM
Quote from: JerryArkansas on September 14, 2016, 06:03:33 AM
Quote from: LittleBigOctopus on September 14, 2016, 06:01:53 AM
Quote from: JerryArkansas on September 14, 2016, 05:59:24 AM
Ok, love the 43R to 36D breakdown in party id numbers in the poll.  Really makes it seem valid.
This junk is needed to be unskewed!
No unskewing, just a critique on the poll.
It is. You are Shy Unskewer Smiley

You didn't criticise methodology (controlled by pollster), you criticized the results ("controlled" by voters).
When people switch between candidate, they likely switch their selfreported party identification as well. It is not strange at all. It'd be strange, if they didn't.

But yeah, the natural noise in this poll is probably Trump-friendly.
I was critiquing what method they are using for the LV screen.  But again keep posting the sh**t that you spew all each and every day.  It really makes you look great.
What's wrong with their method? Results, I guess? Smiley
When you have a party id that is more or less as republican as 2004,  your going to have problems.
Logged
JerryArkansas
jerryarkansas
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,535
United States


« Reply #4 on: September 14, 2016, 06:40:09 AM »
Quote from: LittleBigOctopus on September 14, 2016, 06:39:00 AM
OK, I give up. Selzer is junk. Red hacks here are experts.
Only hack I see is you. 
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.03 seconds with 13 queries.