Did anyone else get really nostalgic during the Obama/Clinton hug?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 29, 2024, 10:32:31 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Forum Community
  Forum Community (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, YE, KoopaDaQuick 🇵🇸)
  Did anyone else get really nostalgic during the Obama/Clinton hug?		 « previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Did anyone else get really nostalgic during the Obama/Clinton hug?  (Read 368 times)
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,840
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: July 31, 2016, 03:31:44 AM »
Not to get all BRTD here, but as someone who started paying attention to politics in 2007 and having been a Hillary supporter for nearly a decade, it was pretty amazing to see things come full circle like that.
Logged
Kingpoleon
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,144
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: July 31, 2016, 03:50:07 AM »
Are you okay?
Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,179
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: July 31, 2016, 04:00:32 AM »
No. 2008 was an incredibly easy choice and the right candidate won, that's all. Unfortunately the same can't be said of 2016.
Logged
Goldwater
Republitarian
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,071
United States


Political Matrix
E: 1.55, S: -4.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: July 31, 2016, 09:38:17 AM »
Seriously, what's with you people?
Logged
Sprouts Farmers Market ✘
Sprouts
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,762
Italy


Political Matrix
E: -4.90, S: 1.74

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: July 31, 2016, 09:42:35 AM »
Quote from: I did not see L.A. on July 31, 2016, 04:00:32 AM
No. 2008 was an incredibly easy choice and the right candidate won, that's all. Unfortunately the same can't be said of 2016.
Logged
This account no longer in use.
cxs018
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,282


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: July 31, 2016, 01:30:51 PM »
Quote from: Goldwater on July 31, 2016, 09:38:17 AM
Seriously, what's with you people?
Logged
Mr. Reactionary
blackraisin
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,804
United States


Political Matrix
E: 5.45, S: -3.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: July 31, 2016, 04:54:32 PM »
Logged
Californiadreaming
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 678
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: July 31, 2016, 04:55:35 PM »
Quote from: Sprouts Farmers Market ✘ on July 31, 2016, 09:42:35 AM
Quote from: I did not see L.A. on July 31, 2016, 04:00:32 AM
No. 2008 was an incredibly easy choice and the right candidate won, that's all. Unfortunately the same can't be said of 2016.
This, pretty much.
Logged
Californiadreaming
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 678
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: July 31, 2016, 04:57:30 PM »
Quote from: IceSpear on July 31, 2016, 03:31:44 AM
Not to get all BRTD here, but as someone who started paying attention to politics in 2007 and having been a Hillary supporter for nearly a decade, it was pretty amazing to see things come full circle like that.
Was 20 (or 28, if one includes Bush Sr.'s years as Reagan's VP) years of continuous Bush-Clinton rule not enough for you back in 2008?

No offense, but this is certainly a completely serious question. After all, I vehemently supported Obama in 2008 in large part (but not only) for this reason. Indeed, American politics certainly shouldn't be dynastic--especially at the highest level(s)! Sad
Logged
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,840
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: July 31, 2016, 07:49:59 PM »
Good lord guys, calm down. It's not like I wrote a poem.

Quote from: Californiadreaming on July 31, 2016, 04:57:30 PM
Quote from: IceSpear on July 31, 2016, 03:31:44 AM
Not to get all BRTD here, but as someone who started paying attention to politics in 2007 and having been a Hillary supporter for nearly a decade, it was pretty amazing to see things come full circle like that.
Was 20 (or 28, if one includes Bush Sr.'s years as Reagan's VP) years of continuous Bush-Clinton rule not enough for you back in 2008?

No offense, but this is certainly a completely serious question. After all, I vehemently supported Obama in 2008 in large part (but not only) for this reason. Indeed, American politics certainly shouldn't be dynastic--especially at the highest level(s)! Sad

The Clintons are not a dynasty. Unless Chelsea runs for office.
Logged
RaphaelDLG
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,687
United States


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: August 01, 2016, 11:37:20 PM »
« Edited: August 02, 2016, 12:12:32 AM by RaphaelDLG »
Quote from: IceSpear on July 31, 2016, 07:49:59 PM

The Clintons are not a dynasty. Unless Chelsea runs for office.

Don't even f***ing say that, man.  At the very least say "knock on wood," or something.
Logged
HagridOfTheDeep
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,742
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -4.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: August 02, 2016, 12:17:02 AM »
To the OP: Immeasurably yes. Purple heart
Logged
Lexii, harbinger of chaos and sexual anarchy
Alex
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,148
Argentina


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: August 02, 2016, 03:42:17 AM »
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.054 seconds with 12 queries.