New Voter Map
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 27, 2024, 08:41:57 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections (Moderators: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee, Lumine)
  New Voter Map		 « previous next »
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7
Author Topic: New Voter Map  (Read 9657 times)
Peter
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,030


Political Matrix
E: -0.77, S: -7.48

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: June 21, 2005, 02:00:45 PM »
« edited: June 26, 2005, 03:32:42 PM by Pope PD »
Last updated: 25 June, 2005



Above is the distribution of voters who voted in the last election - the basis of the federal census, and thus redistricting. The federal census will be finalised at noon on Friday 1st July - Since True Dem has told me that he will be away, I suppose I will be doing the finalising.

For those of you who care, there are four more voters on the rolls who will not be included on the map:
Afleitch (WA)
AuH2O (SC)
Huck Finn (NY)
Ben (VA) - just registered
Clay (GA)

Anybody who wants to fill the gaps, feel free.
Logged
Gabu
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,386
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -4.32, S: -6.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: June 21, 2005, 02:17:45 PM »
Wow, New York is in the single digits of population?  That was quite the population exodus since last time.
Logged
ilikeverin
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,410
Timor-Leste


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: June 21, 2005, 02:27:27 PM »
Total population: 111 (by my count)
Ideal districts: 4 22s, 1 23
Logged
Colin
ColinW
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,684
Papua New Guinea


Political Matrix
E: 3.87, S: -6.09

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: June 21, 2005, 02:32:25 PM »

New York, PA, New Jersey anyone?
Logged
Peter
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,030


Political Matrix
E: -0.77, S: -7.48

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: June 21, 2005, 02:32:30 PM »
Quote from: Droll Ilikeverin on June 21, 2005, 02:27:27 PM
Total population: 111 (by my count)
Ideal districts: 4 22s, 1 23

Well, 111 is exactly how many people voted, so thats right.


Impossible under contiguity rules - the rest of New England would be too far from MD and VA to link up with them
Logged
Gabu
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,386
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -4.32, S: -6.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: June 21, 2005, 02:39:44 PM »
Quote from: Pope PD on June 21, 2005, 02:32:30 PM
Quote from: Droll Ilikeverin on June 21, 2005, 02:27:27 PM
Total population: 111 (by my count)
Ideal districts: 4 22s, 1 23

Well, 111 is exactly how many people voted, so thats right.


Impossible under contiguity rules - the rest of New England would be too far from MD and VA to link up with them

New York, Pennsylvania, and Vermont would be possible, though.
Logged
Alcon
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,866
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: June 21, 2005, 02:45:56 PM »
Isn't MissCatholic registered in South Dakota?
Logged
MasterJedi
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,653
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: June 21, 2005, 02:48:11 PM »
Quote from: Alcon on June 21, 2005, 02:45:56 PM
Isn't MissCatholic registered in South Dakota?

Yes and Yaks Hairbrush is in Minnesota but he didn't vote either.
Logged
Alcon
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,866
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: June 21, 2005, 02:48:58 PM »
Quote from: Senator MasterJedi on June 21, 2005, 02:48:11 PM
Quote from: Alcon on June 21, 2005, 02:45:56 PM
Isn't MissCatholic registered in South Dakota?

Yes and Yaks Hairbrush is in Minnesota but he didn't vote either.

Ohh, I thought this was the voter rolls in general. Nevermind then.
Logged
Peter
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,030


Political Matrix
E: -0.77, S: -7.48

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: June 21, 2005, 02:50:42 PM »
Miss Catholic has been deleted from the voter rolls as well.
Logged
ilikeverin
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,410
Timor-Leste


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: June 21, 2005, 02:55:19 PM »
As such, I'd like to put foward the following maps (note that all have a mere one Senator per district, and are thus not gerrymandered politically):



A sane one (Yes, I know, all the 'old fogies' from the forum are probably shocked); I think almost everyone would be fine with this one.



I call this one the 'Screw the South' map, because the Southeast could really use some major screwing right now.



I call this one the 'ILV and Friends!' map, because I tried to put as many people I consider friends (or at least, friendly aquaintances) in the green district as possible! Cheesy  (Note: as I have two Senate friends, and I did not want to put them in the same district so they'd have to run against each other, I had to put the Senate friend that is geographically closest to me in my district.  Also, if I forgot any forum friends, I'm sorry Sad I tried to get as many of you in my district as possible)

Although I am not Governor, I hope that at least one of these maps is put forward, though I'd prefer all three.
Logged
CheeseWhiz
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,538


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: June 21, 2005, 03:02:34 PM »
Quote from: Droll Ilikeverin on June 21, 2005, 02:55:19 PM
I call this one the 'ILV and Friends!' map, because I tried to put as many people I consider friends (or at least, friendly aquaintances) in the green district as possible! Cheesy 

I see Nebraska’s in the green one Cheesy
Logged
JohnFKennedy
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,448


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: June 21, 2005, 03:02:51 PM »
Why not swap Colorado, Wyoming and Montana for Texas? That would be more aesthetically pleasing to say the least
Logged
Emsworth
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,054


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: June 21, 2005, 03:04:59 PM »
Quote from: Droll Ilikeverin on June 21, 2005, 02:55:19 PM


A sane one (Yes, I know, all the 'old fogies' from the forum are probably shocked); I think almost everyone would be fine with this one.
This one is good, but if MHS2002 gets elected, it will have two Senators. Perhaps Vermont could become part of the the orange district, and Connecticut could join the blue district. Also, if this were done, the blue district would become contiguous.

My other suggestion on this map would be to make Texas a part of the green district, and Montana, Wyoming, and Colorado a part of the red district.
Logged
MasterJedi
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,653
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: June 21, 2005, 03:06:47 PM »
King said he won't run for re-election so if MHS gets elected no troubles.
Logged
ilikeverin
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,410
Timor-Leste


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: June 21, 2005, 03:08:38 PM »
Quote from: John F. Kennedy on June 21, 2005, 03:02:51 PM
Why not swap Colorado, Wyoming and Montana for Texas? That would be more aesthetically pleasing to say the least

No, I rather like the Midwest being whole ...umm...

I dunno, to me it'd look rather odd to see Texas sticking out randomly.
Logged
TheWildCard
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,529
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: June 21, 2005, 03:11:09 PM »
Quote from: Droll Ilikeverin on June 21, 2005, 02:55:19 PM
As such, I'd like to put foward the following maps (note that all have a mere one Senator per district, and are thus not gerrymandered politically):




Decent my suggestions would be:

Give Ohio to the Green District, TX, OK, and MO to the Yellow District and MT, WY and WY should go into the Red District
Logged
Joe Republic
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 40,082
Ukraine


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: June 21, 2005, 03:12:18 PM »
What's the maximum variance of population between the districts again?
Logged
Emsworth
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,054


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: June 21, 2005, 03:13:49 PM »
Quote from: Joe Republic on June 21, 2005, 03:12:18 PM
What's the maximum variance of population between the districts again?
Three more than the minimum possible variance, I believe.
Logged
Peter
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,030


Political Matrix
E: -0.77, S: -7.48

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #19 on: June 21, 2005, 03:20:47 PM »
« Edited: June 25, 2005, 05:35:14 PM by Pope PD »


Blue East - 21
Grey - 24
Green - 22
Red - 21
Blue West - 23

This map is mostly about keeping as close to what we presently have as is reasonable.
Logged
Frodo
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 24,577
United States


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #20 on: June 21, 2005, 03:23:27 PM »
Quote from: Pope PD on June 21, 2005, 03:20:47 PM


Blue East - 21
Grey - 24
Green - 23
Red - 21
Blue West - 22

This map is mostly about keeping as close to what we presently have as is reasonable.

This I can live with -it is at least saner than any of the ones ILV is proposing. 
Logged
ilikeverin
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,410
Timor-Leste


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #21 on: June 21, 2005, 03:25:07 PM »
Quote from: Frodo on June 21, 2005, 03:23:27 PM
Quote from: Pope PD on June 21, 2005, 03:20:47 PM


Blue East - 21
Grey - 24
Green - 23
Red - 21
Blue West - 22

This map is mostly about keeping as close to what we presently have as is reasonable.

This I can live with -it is at least saner than any of the ones ILV is proposing.

*sigh* Not this again...
Logged
MasterJedi
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,653
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #22 on: June 21, 2005, 03:26:10 PM »
Quote from: Frodo on June 21, 2005, 03:23:27 PM
Quote from: Pope PD on June 21, 2005, 03:20:47 PM


Blue East - 21
Grey - 24
Green - 23
Red - 21
Blue West - 22

This map is mostly about keeping as close to what we presently have as is reasonable.

This I can live with -it is at least saner than any of the ones ILV is proposing. 

I'd go for this!
Logged
7,052,770
Harry
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 35,423
Ukraine


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #23 on: June 21, 2005, 03:26:31 PM »
Quote from: Pope PD on June 21, 2005, 03:20:47 PM


Blue East - 21
Grey - 24
Green - 23
Red - 21
Blue West - 22

This map is mostly about keeping as close to what we presently have as is reasonable.
I can definitely go with this one.
Logged
Joe Republic
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 40,082
Ukraine


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #24 on: June 21, 2005, 03:30:21 PM »
Here's my proposal:



Populations:
NY et al: 21
PA et al: 21
FL et al: 23
MN et al: 22
CA et al: 22
Logged
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.066 seconds with 11 queries.