What a Sanders win would've looked like (D Primary)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 29, 2024, 09:02:38 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  U.S. Presidential Election Results (Moderator: Dereich)
  What a Sanders win would've looked like (D Primary)
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: What a Sanders win would've looked like (D Primary)  (Read 828 times)
ElectionsGuy
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,102
United States


Political Matrix
E: 7.10, S: -7.65

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: July 07, 2016, 07:58:22 PM »



Ohio, Arizona and Pennsylvania are the closest states. Clinton has a good Super Tuesday just as she did in real life but she has a horrible time trying to win states in the Midwest. I think after Pennsylvania most would call Sanders the front runner (sorry IceSpear) and then he goes on to win California and every state in between except New Jersey.
Logged
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,840
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: July 07, 2016, 09:10:28 PM »

Is this just uniform swing?

I think if we assume he still gets buried in the South, he probably needs to win NY to be able to have a chance at coming back. Even a narrow Hillary win there probably wouldn't have been enough to dig him out of the hole.
Logged
VPH
vivaportugalhabs
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,700
United States


Political Matrix
E: -4.13, S: -0.17

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: July 08, 2016, 10:29:14 AM »
« Edited: July 08, 2016, 10:31:01 AM by VPH »

I'd roll with the assumption that if Sanders was going to win, he would have put some investment into the South. He would not have won there, but for simple momentum reasons he couldn't avoid the South like he did irl. Maybe if he could hit 35% in AR and GA, 25% in AL and MS, 30% in LA and SC, and 40% in VA he would have not had the crushing blow to momentum. Also he would have gotten some more delegates.
Logged
Boston Bread
New Canadaland
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,636
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -5.00, S: -5.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: July 08, 2016, 10:50:21 AM »

I'd roll with the assumption that if Sanders was going to win, he would have put some investment into the South. He would not have won there, but for simple momentum reasons he couldn't avoid the South like he did irl. Maybe if he could hit 35% in AR and GA, 25% in AL and MS, 30% in LA and SC, and 40% in VA he would have not had the crushing blow to momentum. Also he would have gotten some more delegates.
Momentum didn't really matter. Sanders could have won by 1. tying with non-whites, or 2. getting to 60% of the white vote.
Option 1 would produce a much different map than the result. Option 2 would see Sanders's winning margins intensify across the North.

If Sanders did get 60% of whites, the map would have looked like this:
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.029 seconds with 11 queries.