Is the Democratic Party an anti-white hate group?

[White Trash]

Democrats have quite literally always portrayed the GOP as rich businessmen tricking a bunch of useful idiots into voting against their interests, be those idiots zealoty Northern Protestant puritans in the 1800s, farmers in the 1950s or poor White Southerners today.  After a while, in a liberal's mind (no offense, just contrasting how I believe liberals and conservatives view the world), the only logical explanation for why people would vote for this party you view as stupid, racist or greedy is that those voters are stupid, racist or greedy themselves.  Once it's been concluded a group is any of those things, what is the incentive to not let 'em have it??

To be fair, working class white Southerners have pretty solidly demonstrated this election season they don't actually know what's in theirs or anybody else's best interest by backing Trump, a rich businessman tricking a bunch of useful idiots into voting for him.

Sick burn dude! That's how you win elections, right?

[SUSAN CRUSHBONE]

somerimes the truth is more important than flattering people. especially considering tartarus sauce presumably isn't actually involved in any kind of public campaign

[Human]

No (sane)

[President Johnson]

Nope.

[Chancellor Tanterterg]

Yes (patriot racist)

FTFY

[Bojack Horseman]

Only if we went full-Coleman Young.

[Zioneer]

*insert self-hating white joke*

[tallguy23]

Of course not. They just do a better job of reaching out to groups who are outside the "mainstream" of America (minorities, non-Christians, LGBT, immigrants, etc.)

Keep in mind all of the above groups will essentially be the "mainstream" in 15-20 years.

[RINO Tom]

Of course not. They just do a better job of reaching out to groups who are outside the "mainstream" of America (minorities, non-Christians, LGBT, immigrants, etc.)

Keep in mind all of the above groups will essentially be the "mainstream" in 15-20 years.

Minorities are the only above group that have any hope of being "the mainstream" in 20 years, dude.

[Goldwater]

Of course not. They just do a better job of reaching out to groups who are outside the "mainstream" of America (minorities, non-Christians, LGBT, immigrants, etc.)

Keep in mind all of the above groups will essentially be the "mainstream" in 15-20 years.

Minorities are the only above group that have any hope of being "the mainstream" in 20 years, dude.

Depends on what you mean by "mainstream".  For example, LGBT acceptance is increasing rapidly, and I doubt in 20 years that being gay or bisexual will be very controversial at all.

[Antonio the Sixth]

Of course not. They just do a better job of reaching out to groups who are outside the "mainstream" of America (minorities, non-Christians, LGBT, immigrants, etc.)

Keep in mind all of the above groups will essentially be the "mainstream" in 15-20 years.

Minorities are the only above group that have any hope of being "the mainstream" in 20 years, dude.

Depends on what you mean by "mainstream".  For example, LGBT acceptance is increasing rapidly, and I doubt in 20 years that being gay or bisexual will be very controversial at all.

If anything, it's the opposite. Depressingly, anti-Black racism will almost certainly endure longer than prejudice against any of these other groups,

[SWE]

Democrats hate the working class, regardless of race.

[beaver2.0]

No.

[RINO Tom]

Of course not. They just do a better job of reaching out to groups who are outside the "mainstream" of America (minorities, non-Christians, LGBT, immigrants, etc.)

Keep in mind all of the above groups will essentially be the "mainstream" in 15-20 years.

Minorities are the only above group that have any hope of being "the mainstream" in 20 years, dude.

Depends on what you mean by "mainstream".  For example, LGBT acceptance is increasing rapidly, and I doubt in 20 years that being gay or bisexual will be very controversial at all.

Acceptance, sure; I thought he was speaking regarding statistical share of the population.