The Orlando murders

[LLR]

Gun control laws (sane, normal, etc.)

[LLR]

Gun control laws (sane, normal, etc.)

Even more than the killer himself?  That's neither sane nor normal.

Without a gun, he would've been weaponless. He would've been powerless. And all those people would be alive.

[LLR]

Gun control laws (sane, normal, etc.)

Even more than the killer himself?  That's neither sane nor normal.

Without a gun, he would've been weaponless. He would've been powerless. And all those people would be alive.

Wow, wow, wow.  This is pathetic.  The KILLER is most to blame for KLLLING.

A killer without a weapon is not a killer.

[LLR]

Gun control laws (sane, normal, etc.)

Even more than the killer himself?  That's neither sane nor normal.

Without a gun, he would've been weaponless. He would've been powerless. And all those people would be alive.

Wow, wow, wow.  This is pathetic.  The KILLER is most to blame for KLLLING.

A killer without a weapon is not a killer.

So if he killed someone with his hands... are his hands responsible more than himself? 

Seek help.

Except that he didn't. I agree that there are many factors at hand, and that it's not solely the guns' fault, but

A) I think they're most at fault
B) If we are to take anything away from this tragic event, it should be that ASSAULT WEAPONS MUST BE BANNED, BACKGROUND CHECKS MUST BE INSTITUTED, AND THE NSA SHOULD BE FORBIDDEN FROM MAKING CAMPAIGN DONATIONS.

[LLR]

The killer is obviously most responsible, but a healthy dose of fundamentalist Islamism certainly didn't help.

Ask the Tsarnaev brothers if you need a gun to kill a bunch of people. If other people there had been armed, he could have been stopped sooner. If "assault weapons" were banned, he would have used a pressure cooker.

And lest you forget, he passed a background check and a full FBI investigation.

Because bringing a gun to a nightclub (where, if your brain cant comprehend, people drink) is an amazing idea!!