Democratic KY / OR primary results thread (first polls close at 6pm ET)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 30, 2024, 12:43:08 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Election
  Democratic KY / OR primary results thread (first polls close at 6pm ET)
« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 6 7 8 9 10 [11] 12 13 14 15 16 ... 22
Author Topic: Democratic KY / OR primary results thread (first polls close at 6pm ET)  (Read 24488 times)
Boston Bread
New Canadaland
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,636
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -5.00, S: -5.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #250 on: May 17, 2016, 07:43:59 PM »

I noticed that Letcher county had more votes for Sanders than Obama in 2012 general election. lol
Logged
ElectionsGuy
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,102
United States


Political Matrix
E: 7.10, S: -7.65

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #251 on: May 17, 2016, 07:44:12 PM »

41% of remaining precincts are from Jefferson and Kenton. Good for Hillary.
Logged
Maxwell
mah519
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,459
Germany


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -6.96

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #252 on: May 17, 2016, 07:44:50 PM »

Am I wrong for thinking this is something of an upset for Clinton - I mean, Sanders won West Virginia by 15 points!
Logged
Fmr President & Senator Polnut
polnut
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,489
Australia


Political Matrix
E: -2.71, S: -5.22

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #253 on: May 17, 2016, 07:46:28 PM »

Am I wrong for thinking this is something of an upset for Clinton - I mean, Sanders won West Virginia by 15 points!

If you apply the Vox/Salon etc filter to it, winning a state you really should have won based on common sense is an upset, see the coverage of Sanders winning Indiana.
Logged
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,840
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #254 on: May 17, 2016, 07:46:33 PM »

Am I wrong for thinking this is something of an upset for Clinton - I mean, Sanders won West Virginia by 15 points!

Nah, it's about as expected. The entirety of WV was coal country. This time it's balanced out by places like Louisville, Lexington, and the Cincinnati suburbs. Both campaigns apparently thought it was a coin flip.
Logged
Frodo
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 24,581
United States


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #255 on: May 17, 2016, 07:48:20 PM »

The vote is tightening again -should we expect a recount?
Logged
ag
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,828


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #256 on: May 17, 2016, 07:48:31 PM »

Back to being very close, though, of course, Jefferson is still outstanding.
Logged
ElectionsGuy
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,102
United States


Political Matrix
E: 7.10, S: -7.65

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #257 on: May 17, 2016, 07:51:36 PM »

Am I wrong for thinking this is something of an upset for Clinton - I mean, Sanders won West Virginia by 15 points!

If you apply the Vox/Salon etc filter to it, winning a state you really should have won based on common sense is an upset, see the coverage of Sanders winning Indiana.

Do you seriously think Sanders should've won Indiana? It was over 10% black and has a decent urban population
Logged
ag
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,828


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #258 on: May 17, 2016, 07:51:53 PM »

The margin is 28 votes!
Logged
ag
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,828


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #259 on: May 17, 2016, 07:52:34 PM »

Sanders is ahead by 126, but almost all that is left is Jefferson.
Logged
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,840
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #260 on: May 17, 2016, 07:53:31 PM »

If the remaining Jefferson precincts are by a fluke Sanders friendly, this could be Missouri 2.0...
Logged
/
darthebearnc
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,367
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #261 on: May 17, 2016, 07:53:47 PM »

Does anyone have a list of which counties aren't 100% in yet?
Logged
yourelection
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 436


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #262 on: May 17, 2016, 07:54:20 PM »

As far as delegate numbers goes this will be a patt. It is all about the bragging rights for winning the state.
Logged
Ronnie
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,993
United States
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #263 on: May 17, 2016, 07:54:24 PM »

Sanders is the little engine that (almost) could, lol.
Logged
HAnnA MArin County
semocrat08
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,039
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #264 on: May 17, 2016, 07:54:31 PM »

Am I wrong for thinking this is something of an upset for Clinton - I mean, Sanders won West Virginia by 15 points!

If you apply the Vox/Salon etc filter to it, winning a state you really should have won based on common sense is an upset, see the coverage of Sanders winning Indiana.

Do you seriously think Sanders should've won Indiana? It was over 10% black and has a decent urban population

That speaks volumes to the validity behind this whole "revolution," that if the African American vote is in double digits, that Bernie shouldn't win the state. Sad!
Logged
ag
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,828


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #265 on: May 17, 2016, 07:55:34 PM »

Does anyone have a list of which counties aren't 100% in yet?

Besides Jefferson it is, it seems, mostly Henderson and Warren.
Logged
NOVA Green
Oregon Progressive
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,454
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #266 on: May 17, 2016, 07:55:48 PM »

As a Clinton supporter, it annoys/concerns me how much rural and Conservative Democrats have abandoned her in Appalachia. Why would they vote for a socialist anyway? They don't agree with his policies certainly.

I think the actual question should be, why have so many rural and small town Democrats feel that the Democratic Party has abandoned them?

I spent much of my life in small town and rural Oregon and recall vividly how many lifelong Democrats in Southern Oregon, including many union members in Coos and Douglas county, felt that the Democratic president (Clinton) was taking the side of radical environmentalists versus working people.

Needless to say, the Timber industry and local Republican politicians tried to present the argument as jobs versus the environment, rather than talk frankly about the actual economic situation and why the logging and mill jobs were disappearing.

I see many similarities between the decline of the Timber industry in the PacNW and what is happening currently within Coal Country.

And quite frankly, these are parts of the country where the Unions came in after several generations of blood, sweat, and tears and " Ain't Done Nothing If You Ain't Been Called A Red" doesn't actually hold water with the history of the IWW, ILWU, UMWA, etc...

Socialist is a word that the company bosses and operators have been throwing around for a 100 years in many parts of the country to describe anyone that is a Union Man. Smiley
Logged
ElectionsGuy
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,102
United States


Political Matrix
E: 7.10, S: -7.65

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #267 on: May 17, 2016, 07:55:55 PM »

52% of the remaining precincts are Jefferson County. Almost certain Clinton win.
Logged
Fmr President & Senator Polnut
polnut
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,489
Australia


Political Matrix
E: -2.71, S: -5.22

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #268 on: May 17, 2016, 07:57:51 PM »

Am I wrong for thinking this is something of an upset for Clinton - I mean, Sanders won West Virginia by 15 points!

If you apply the Vox/Salon etc filter to it, winning a state you really should have won based on common sense is an upset, see the coverage of Sanders winning Indiana.

Do you seriously think Sanders should've won Indiana? It was over 10% black and has a decent urban population

Yes. I thought Clinton had momentum, and could have just eeeked out a win, but being an open primary in a still very white state, he had the upper hand.
Logged
catographer
Megameow
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,498
United States
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #269 on: May 17, 2016, 07:58:27 PM »

As a Clinton supporter, it annoys/concerns me how much rural and Conservative Democrats have abandoned her in Appalachia. Why would they vote for a socialist anyway? They don't agree with his policies certainly.

I think the actual question should be, why have so many rural and small town Democrats feel that the Democratic Party has abandoned them?

I spent much of my life in small town and rural Oregon and recall vividly how many lifelong Democrats in Southern Oregon, including many union members in Coos and Douglas county, felt that the Democratic president (Clinton) was taking the side of radical environmentalists versus working people.

Needless to say, the Timber industry and local Republican politicians tried to present the argument as jobs versus the environment, rather than talk frankly about the actual economic situation and why the logging and mill jobs were disappearing.

I see many similarities between the decline of the Timber industry in the PacNW and what is happening currently within Coal Country.

And quite frankly, these are parts of the country where the Unions came in after several generations of blood, sweat, and tears and " Ain't Done Nothing If You Ain't Been Called A Red" doesn't actually hold water with the history of the IWW, ILWU, UMWA, etc...

Socialist is a word that the company bosses and operators have been throwing around for a 100 years in many parts of the country to describe anyone that is a Union Man. Smiley

Especially with Clinton and Trump as the symbols of what their parties stand for, the Democratic party and the Republican party are increasing the upscale and downscale parties respectively. Democrats are the party of the cosmopolitans, the professional class, the white collar voters. Republicans are the party of the blue collar, non-college educated, poor rural America.
Logged
ag
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,828


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #270 on: May 17, 2016, 07:59:29 PM »

As a Clinton supporter, it annoys/concerns me how much rural and Conservative Democrats have abandoned her in Appalachia. Why would they vote for a socialist anyway? They don't agree with his policies certainly.

I think the actual question should be, why have so many rural and small town Democrats feel that the Democratic Party has abandoned them?

I spent much of my life in small town and rural Oregon and recall vividly how many lifelong Democrats in Southern Oregon, including many union members in Coos and Douglas county, felt that the Democratic president (Clinton) was taking the side of radical environmentalists versus working people.

Needless to say, the Timber industry and local Republican politicians tried to present the argument as jobs versus the environment, rather than talk frankly about the actual economic situation and why the logging and mill jobs were disappearing.

I see many similarities between the decline of the Timber industry in the PacNW and what is happening currently within Coal Country.

And quite frankly, these are parts of the country where the Unions came in after several generations of blood, sweat, and tears and " Ain't Done Nothing If You Ain't Been Called A Red" doesn't actually hold water with the history of the IWW, ILWU, UMWA, etc...

Socialist is a word that the company bosses and operators have been throwing around for a 100 years in many parts of the country to describe anyone that is a Union Man. Smiley

Especially with Clinton and Trump as the symbols of what their parties stand for, the Democratic party and the Republican party are increasing the upscale and downscale parties respectively. Democrats are the party of the cosmopolitans, the professional class, the white collar voters. Republicans are the party of the blue collar, non-college educated, poor rural America.

I think, it can be formulated more clearly. Democratic Party is, increasingly, the party of diversity. Republican Party is the party of homogeneity.
Logged
ag
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,828


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #271 on: May 17, 2016, 08:05:20 PM »

Sanders is over 1,000 votes ahead. Still waiting for Jefferson.
Logged
Crumpets
Thinking Crumpets Crumpet
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,730
United States


Political Matrix
E: -4.06, S: -6.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #272 on: May 17, 2016, 08:06:17 PM »

Sanders is over 1,000 votes ahead. Still waiting for Jefferson.

Where are you looking? NYT has him up 216 votes.
Logged
Crumpets
Thinking Crumpets Crumpet
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,730
United States


Political Matrix
E: -4.06, S: -6.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #273 on: May 17, 2016, 08:06:44 PM »

Sanders is over 1,000 votes ahead. Still waiting for Jefferson.

Where are you looking? NYT has him up 216 votes.

Ah. Just changed.
Logged
sportydude
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 589


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #274 on: May 17, 2016, 08:07:03 PM »

Where have all those new Bernie votes been coming from?
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 6 7 8 9 10 [11] 12 13 14 15 16 ... 22  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.051 seconds with 13 queries.